Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Year: 1939 Page 5 of about 47 results (0.536 seconds)

Oct 10 1939 (PC)

Probodh Kumar Das Vs. the Dantmara Tea Co. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-10-1939

Reported in : (1940)42BOMLR199

..... not maintainable and dismissed it.7. it was conceded by the appellants at their lordships' bar that, apart from section 53a which was added by amendment in 1929 to the transfer of property act, 1882, they had no case. but they contended that, notwithstanding that they had not chosen to sue for specific performance of the contract of october ..... clear that the appellants were well advised in conceding that if they could not invoke section 53a they were out of court.9. in their lordships' opinion the amendment of the law effected by the enactment of section 53a conferred no right of action on a transferee in possession under an unregistered contract of sale. their lordships agree ..... of 1933), which was passed inter alia to regulate the export of tea from india. by section 3 of that act an indian tea licensing committee was set up and under other provisions of the act it was entrusted with the task of determining the total quantity of tea, termed the ' export quota,' which the owner of each tea .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 1939 (PC)

Paladugu Veera Ramachandra Rao Vs. Paladugu Parasuramayya and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-03-1939

Reported in : AIR1940Mad127; (1940)1MLJ235

..... no escape from it when the language of section 48 of the code of civil procedure is read in the light of the provisions of article 182 of the indian limitation act. the words used in the first column of that article make it clear that the legislature did not intend to interfere in any way with the limit of time ..... the legislature advisedly omitted that provision for extension from 13. 48; and that the omission was not accidental. in our opinion the effect of the omission is that an amendment of a decree does not give a new date for starting a period of limitation, if the application for execution is beyond the period of twelve years allowed by section ..... time-barred.7. the question under consideration has been the subject of decisions by the bombay, allahabad, lahore and patna high courts and they have all agreed that an amendment of a decree to bring it in accordance with the judgment does not have the effect of starting a fresh period of limitation. (see narsingrao konher inamdar v. bando .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 1939 (FN)

Ziffrin, Inc. Vs. Reeves

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Nov-13-1939

..... has declared otherwise. interstate commerce includes both importation of property within a state and exportation therefrom. prior to the wilson and webb-kenyon acts, and the twenty-first amendment, the powers of the states over intoxicants in both of these movements were limited by the page 308 u. s. 138 commerce, ..... an unauthorized carrier are not invalid under the commerce clause, or under the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment, nor inconsistent with the federal motor carrier act of 1935, as applied to a contract carrier in an established business of transporting such liquors, produced in kentucky, to consignees ..... the case was heard below on plaintiff's application for a preliminary injunction, and defendants' motions to dissolve a temporary restraining order and to dismiss the amended bill of complaint. mr. justice mcreynolds delivered the opinion of the court. since march, 1933, appellant, an indiana corporation, has continuously received whiskey from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1939 (PC)

Srimath Deivasikamani Ponnambala Desikar Vs. the Board of Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-1939

Reported in : (1941)2MLJ175

..... hearing unless there are special reasons for expediting it, but the court for proper reasons shown will expedite the hearing and as the statement that schemes settled or amended by the court are ineffective is not supported by reasons and is contrary to my experience of many years, i am not prepared to accept it. a ..... temple servants have complained that they are kept waiting longer than in other institutions. in the neighbouring estate of sivaganga, which is administered by a member of the indian civil service and where there are larger resources, servants are not paid regularly. when the petitioner took over charge of the temples the salaries were nine months in ..... supervision. the control is shared by the board of supervision and the court. the act contemplates superintendence and control by the board. the first reason therefore is held to be proved. what is argued, however, is that a suit might be filed for the amendment of the scheme. but, as has been pointed out, the said remedy is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1939 (PC)

Smt. Deivasikamani Ponnambala Desikar Vs. Board of Commissioners for H ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-1939

Reported in : AIR1941Mad878

..... hearing unless there are special reasons for expediting it, but the court for proper reasons shown will expedite the hearing and as the statement that schemes settled or amended by the court are ineffective is not supported by reasons and is contrary to my experience of many years. i am not prepared to accept it. a ..... temple servants have complained that they are kept waiting longer than in other institutions. in the neighbouring estate of sivaganga, which is administered by a member of the indian civil service and where there are larger resources, servants are not paid regularly. when the petitioner took over charge of the temples the salaries were nine months in ..... supervision. the control is shared by the board of supervision and the court. the act contemplates superintendence and control by the board. the first reason therefore is held to be proved. what is argued, however, is that a suit might be filed for the amendment of the scheme. but, as has been pointed out, the said remedy is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1939 (PC)

Dayaldas Kushiram Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-15-1939

Reported in : (1940)42BOMLR414

..... april 1, 1939, when the amending, act came into operation, it was provided that there should be the following classes of income-tax authorities for the ..... transferred to the commissioner (central). in order to determine the questions which arise one has to look at section 5, read with section 64, of the indian income-tax act. 4. now, under section 5 as it existed prior to ..... sub-section (1), of the indian income-tax act. if that point is decided in favour of the assessee, the further question, which arises in respect of the two earlier years, has no great relevance; that question being whether, in any case, those earlier assessments which had started before the amending act of 1939 came into operation can be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1939 (PC)

Municipal Commissioners Vs. Gangamani Chaudhurani W/O Akshoy Kumar Bas ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Dec-18-1939

Reported in : AIR1940Cal153

..... the naming of the chairman as the defendant. this was therefore a case where a misdescription was corrected and not a case where a new party was impleaded by the amendment. such was the view taken by jack j., and it is a view supported by the decisions in gopiram behariram v. e.i. ry. & o. & r. ry. (1926 ..... . but the plaint speaks for itself and it is quite impossible for us to have recourse to extrinsic evidence. a personal decree was sought against the agent, east indian railway, and there is no suggestion in the plaint that it was sought to bind the railway company by any decree that the plaintiff might obtain1 against the defendant. ..... against the chairman of the commissioners instead of against the commissioners themselves. the mistake appears to have been discovered subsequently and the plaint was amended on 5th june 1934, so as to implead the municipal commissioners themselves as required by the new act. the point now taken before us on behalf of the appellant is that the suit in its .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //