Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Court: us supreme court Year: 2009 Page 6 of about 201 results (2.523 seconds)

Mar 23 2009 (SC)

Urmila Roy and ors. Vs. Bengal Peerless Housing Development Company Lt ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC2086; JT2009(4)SC484; (2009)5MLJ129(SC); 2009(4)SCALE250; (2009)5SCC242; 2009(4)LC1978(SC):2009AIRSCW2659:2009(2)LHSC1302

..... after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984 shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification:provided further that no such declaration shall be ..... particular land covered by a notification under section 4, sub-section (1),-(i) published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment and validation) ordinance, 1967 but before the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act,1984 shall be made after the expiry of three years from the date of the publication of the notification; or(ii) published ..... houses to the people falling in the low income group and to others. again the housing board was unable to meet the challenge. the housing board act was amended to bring in the concept of joint venture in order to tap the resources of the private sector. thus a joint venture came into being as disclosed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2009 (SC)

Vimal Chand Ghevarchand JaIn and ors. Vs. Ramakant Eknath Jajoo

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-23-2009

Reported in : 2009(3)AWC3137(SC); 2009(3)BomCR730; JT2009(6)SC570; 2009(5)SCALE59; (2009)5SCC713:2009AIRSCW3624:2009(4)LHSC2646; 2009(2)CTC861

..... the courts below committed a serious error insofar as they failed to adhere to the best evidence rule as contained in sections 91 and 92 of the indian evidence act.(ii) first appellate court as also the high court furthermore committed a serious error insofar as they failed to take into consideration that subsequent plea raised by ..... by the learned trial court. {[see kamakshi builders v. ambedkar educational society and ors. : air2007sc2191 }.16. the first appellate court, however, having regard to the amendment carried out in the written statement setting up a totally inconsistent plea from the one taken before the learned trial court by the respondent posed a question as to ..... purpose, critical analysis of the prevarication of the stand taken by the respondent from stage to stage also became relevant. it is true that when a pleading is amended, it, subject to just exceptions, takes effect from the date when original one is filed. it is also true that the appellate court, in exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 25 2009 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. Eli Lilly and Company (India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-25-2009

Reported in : 2009BusLR418(SC); (2009)223CTR(SC)20; [2009]312ITR225(SC); JT2009(5)SC78; 2009(4)SCALE384; [2009]178TAXMAN505(SC); 2009(4)LC1742(SC); 2009AIRSCW3104

..... the foreign employer (who is directly paying to the foreign account of the expatriate employee outside india), particularly in view of the amendment to section 9(1)(ii), the obligation of the indian employer has to be interpreted coextensively and in respect to the entire salary income of the expatriate employee so long as the salary ..... penalty proceedings under section 271c.17. on the legal issue, learned counsel contended that the department was not right in its submission that after the amendment of section 9(1)(ii) made to the act after the decision in the case of cit v. s.g. pgnatale reported in : [1980]124itr391(guj) , retention/continuation dues can be ..... in manufacturing and selling pharmaceutical products during the financial years 1992-93 to 1999-00. in the course of survey under section 133a of the income-tax act, 1961 ('1961 act' for short), the ao noticed that the foreign company had seconded four expatriates to the joint venture in india; that, the tax-deductor-assessee was a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2009 (SC)

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Hongo India (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2009

Reported in : (2009)5SCC791

..... we are concerned with "reference application" made to the high court under section 35h (1) of the act before amendment of central excise act by act 49/2005 (w.e.f. 28.12.2005) by which several provisions of the act were omitted including section 35h. however, in view of the reference made it is but proper to consider ..... that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period." "29. savings.- (1) nothing in this act shall affect section 25 of the indian contract act, 1872 (9 of 1872). (2) where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different ..... an application challenging the award on 19.4.1999 under section 30 read with section 16 of the arbitration act, 1940. subsequently, the application was amended by inserting the words "arbitration and conciliation act, 1996" in place of "arbitration act, 1940". the application was dismissed by the learned single judge on 26.10.1999 on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2009 (SC)

Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise Vs. Hongo India (P) Ltd. an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2009

Reported in : (2009)223CTR(SC)225; 2009(236)ELT417(SC); [2009]315ITR449(SC); JT2009(7)SC83; 2009(4)SCALE374; [2009]21STT90; 2009(3)LC1555(SC); (2009)24VST298(SC); 2009(5)SCC791;

..... , we are concerned with 'reference application' made to the high court under section 35h(1) of the act before amendment of central excise act by act 49/2005 (w.e.f. 28.12.2005) by which several provisions of the act were omitted including section 35h. however, in view of the reference made it is but proper to consider ..... that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application within such period.29. savings.- (1) nothing in this act shall affect section 25 of the indian contract act, 1872 (9 of 1872).(2) where any special or local law prescribes for any suit, appeal or application a period of limitation different ..... an application challenging the award on 19.4.1999 under section 30 read with section 16 of the arbitration act, 1940. subsequently, the application was amended by inserting the words 'arbitration and conciliation act, 1996' in place of 'arbitration act, 1940'. the application was dismissed by the learned single judge on 26.10.1999 on the ground that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 27 2009 (SC)

Bank of India and anr. Vs. K. Mohandas and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-27-2009

Reported in : JT2009(5)SC247; (2009)IIILLJ609SC; (2009)5MLJ807(SC); 2009(4)SCALE596; (2009)5SCC313; 2009(3)SLJ493(SC)

..... . no. 4/8/4/2000-irgovernment of indiaministry of financedepartment of economic affairs(banking division)new delhi, the 5th sept, 2000tothe personnel advisor, indian bank's association,mumbai.sub: amendment to regulation 29 of the pension regulations.sir,i am directed to refer to this division's letter no. 11/1/99 ir dated 29th august ..... has to be understood to mean with necessary changes in points of details. section 23 of the contract act has no application to the present fact situation.40. it was submitted on behalf of the banks that amendment to regulation 28 has neither been challenged nor the said regulation has been declared ultra vires and, therefore ..... application once submitted.(viii) an employee whose application for voluntary retirement is accepted and relieved from the bank shall be eligible for:(i) gratuity as per gratuity act/service gratuity as the case may be;(ii) own contribution of provident fund and bank contribution towards provident fund, in case of those who have opted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (SC)

Association of Resident of Mhow (Rom) and anr. Vs. the Delimitation Co ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC3278; 2009(3)AWC2274(SC); JT2009(5)SC69; 2009(5)SCALE261; (2009)5SCC404; 2009(4)LC1785(SC); 2009AIRSCW3424; 2009(5)LHSC2998

..... constituency is not unlimited but is structured by the provisions of the act and more particularly by sections 8 and 9 of the act apart from the constitution (eighty-fourth amendment) act, 2001 and constitution (eighty-seventh amendment) act, 2003 which have, inter alia, amended articles 81, 82, 170, 330 and 332 of the constitution ..... of india. the effect of these amendments to the constitution inter alia is that ..... constituency from indore parliamentary constituency and included the same into dhar parliamentary constituency without complying with the mandatory requirements of section 9 of the act. the submission was that there was no proposal by the commission for shifting mhow assembly constituency from indore parliamentary constituency to dhar parliamentary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2009 (SC)

Sanjay Dutt Vs. State of Maharashtra Tr. Cbi, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-31-2009

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1608; 2009(111)BomLR2116; 2009CriLJ2785; (2009)3GLR1833(SC); JT2009(4)SC614; 2009(4)SCALE369; (2009)5SCC787; 2009(4)LC2036(SC)

..... not think that this is a fit case where conviction and sentence could be suspended so that the bar under section 8(3) of the representation of people act, 1951 will not operate against the petitioner. law prohibits any person who has been convicted of any offence and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than two years ..... petitioner is now desirous of contesting election to the house of people from lucknow parliament constituency and in view of section 8(3) of the representation of people act, 1951, he has incurred disqualification from contesting the election for becoming a member of either house of parliament. therefore, it is prayed that the conviction and sentence ..... accused in special case no. 1/93 (bombay blast case) before the special judge, tada (mumbai), was charged under various sections of terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act (tada) such as section 3(3), section 5 and section 6 and also for the offence under section 3 and section 7 read with sections 25(1a) and 25 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2009 (SC)

Satish Kumar Batra and ors. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-01-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC2180; 2009(57)BLJR1488; 2009CriLJ2447; JT2009(5)SC403; RLW2009(4)SC3376; 2009(5)SCALE280; (2009)12SCC491; 2009(4)LC1629(SC)

..... . section 498a appears in chapter xx-a ipc.7. substantive section 498a ipc and presumptive section 113b of the indian evidence act, 1872 (in short 'the evidence act') have been inserted in the respective statutes by the criminal law (second amendment) act, 1983 and by the dowry prohibition (amendment) act, 1986, respectively.8. section 498a ipc and section 113b of the evidence act include in their amplitude past events of cruelty ..... the explanation to section 498a under which 'cruelty' by itself amounts to an offence.12. the object for which section 498a ipc was introduced is amply reflected in the statement of objects and reasons while enacting the criminal law (second amendment) act 46 of 1983. as clearly stated therein the increase in the number of dowry deaths is a matter of serious concern .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 2009 (FN)

14 Penn Plaza Llc Vs. Pyett

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-01-2009

..... of the court of appeals. i respondents are members of the service employees international union, local 32bj (union). under the national labor relations act (nlra), 49 stat. 449, as amended, the union is the exclusive bargaining representative of employees within the building-services industry in new york city, which includes building cleaners, porters, and ..... a provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate claims arising under the age discrimination in employment act of 1967 (adea), 81 stat. 602, as amended, 29 u. s. c. 621 et seq ., is enforceable. the united states court of appeals for the second circuit held that ..... the statutes construed by the court in the foregoing cases and in wilko v. swan , 346 u. s. 427 (1953), have not since been amended in any relevant respect. but the court has in a number of cases replaced our predecessors statutory analysis with judicial reasoning espousing a policy favoring arbitration and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //