Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 2009 Page 6 of about 254 results (0.340 seconds)

Mar 05 2009 (SC)

V.K. Ashokan Vs. Asstt. Excise Commnr. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-2009

Reported in : 2009(164)LC1(SC); JT2009(5)SC104; 2009(4)SCALE225; 2009(3)LC1329(SC)

..... calculated and the terms of the contract provides therefor only for penalty by way of liquidated damages, having regard to the provisions contained in section 74 of the indian contract act a reasonable sum only could be recovered which need not in all situations even be the sum specified in the contract. {see maula bux v. union of ..... stated so explicitly. it was so done prior to the substitution of the present rule. the very fact that the state in exercise of its rule making power amended the rule in terms whereof the original clause (b) was deleted is a clear pointer to show that a conscious step was taken not to take recourse ..... . during the pendency of the said writ petitions, tahsildar (revenue recovery) issued an order in form 11 attaching the immovable properties of the appellants whereupon applications for amendment of the writ petition were filed, inter alia, questioning the proceedings initiated subsequent to the filing of the writ petition.16. a learned single judge of the high .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2009 (SC)

Ptc India Ltd. Vs. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Thr. Its ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Reported in : 2009(2)LHSC1037; 2009AIRSCW2946; 2009LC(SC)489; JT2009(3)SC564; 2009(3)SCALE845; (2009)5SCC466; 2009(3)LC1543(SC)

..... tdsat is a creature of a statute. its jurisdiction is also conferred by a statute. the purpose of creation of tdsat has expressly been stated by parliament in the amending act of 2000. tdsat, thus, failed to take into consideration the amplitude of its jurisdiction and thus misdirected itself in law. xx xx xx 33. the regulatory bodies ..... no valid reason exists why `shareholder' as used in section 18(5) should mean a person other than the one denoted by the same expression in the indian companies act, 1913. in wala wynaad indian gold mining co. in re (1882) 21 ch d 849 chitty, j., observed:i use now myself the term which is common in the courts, ..... the conclusion in the said decision was to the effect that the high court sitting as an appellate court under section 27 of the electricity regulatory commission act, 1998 (in short `1998 act') has no jurisdiction to go into the validity of the regulations. it was ultimately held that there is weighty authority for the proposition that a tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2009 (SC)

izharul Haq Abdul Hamid Shaikh and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-06-2009

Reported in : 2009(57)BLJR1209; (2009)2GLR1502; JT2009(3)SC385; 2009(3)SCALE791; (2009)5SCC283; 2009(3)LC1133(SC)

..... singh v. state of punjab : 1994crilj3139 , in which the constitutional validity of the terrorist affected areas (special courts) act, 1984, the terrorist and disruptive activities (prevention) act, 1987, and the terrorists and disruptive activities procedure (up amendment) act, 1976, had been challenged. after examining the provisions of the aforesaid enactments in detail, on the question of bail ..... 2005 in respect of offences alleged to have been committed under sections 121, 121a, 122, 123. 120b, 34 ipc, section 25(1), ab, aa of the arms act, section 9-b of the explosive substances act read with sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of tada.3. the appellant no. 1, izharul haq abdul hamid ..... to the first information report dated 8th may, 1994, in which, along with the other offences under the indian penal code, arms act and the explosive substances act, offences under sections 3, 4 and 5 of the tada act were also included. mr. sushil kumar submitted that it would also be evident from the affidavit filed on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2009 (FN)

Bartlett Vs. Strickland

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-09-2009

..... court and delivered an opinion, in which the chief justice and justice alito join. this case requires us to interpret 2 of the voting rights act of 1965, 79 stat. 437, as amended, 42 u. s. c. 1973 (2000 ed.). the question is whether the statute can be invoked to require state officials to draw ..... as it then read, no more than elaborates upon the fifteenth amendment and was intended to have an effect no different from that of the fifteenth amendment itself. in 1982, after the mobile ruling, congress amended 2, giving the statute its current form. the original act had employed an intent requirement, prohibiting only those practices imposed or ..... applied to deny or abridge the right to vote. 79 stat. 437. the amended version of 2 requires consideration of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2009 (SC)

U.T. Chandigarh Administration and anr. Vs. Amarjeet Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC1607; 2009(2)AWC2073(SC); II(2009)CPJ1(SC); JT2009(4)SC135; 2009(3)SCALE892; (2009)4SCC660; 2009(3)LC1077(SC):2009AIRSCW2522:2009(1)LHSC1399

..... per cent of the amount due which may be imposed and recovered in the manner laid down in section 8 of the capital of punjab (development and regulation) act, 1952, as amended by act no. 17 of 1973.14. execution of lease deed.--(1) after payment of 25 per cent premium the lessee shall execute a lease deed in form b, ..... it to say that the rate of default interest mentioned in rule 12(3a) as on the date of auction, would alone apply. if rule 12(3a) was not amended increasing the rate of default interest from 12% p.a. to 24% per annum as on the date of auction, then the rate of interest stipulated in rule 12(3a ..... before the lease deed is executed.4. the respondents filed a complaint before the consumer disputes redressal commission, union territory, chandigarh (for short `ut commission') under the consumer protection act, 1986 (`act' for short) in the year 1999. in the said complaint they alleged that in addition to the initial payment of rs. 511250/- towards the lease premium, they had paid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2009 (SC)

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

..... the high court should have entertained the writ petition. the impugned order is set aside accordingly and the appeal is allowed.19. the appellant may be permitted to amend the prayer portion of the writ petition.20. we, however, make it clear that we have not gone into the merit of the matter and all the contentions ..... 8516.79.20electronic mosquito repellents,gadgets and insect repellents,devices and parts and accessoriesthereof._______________________________________________________4. according to the appellant, in this case section 6(1)(a) of the act would be applicable, the relevant portion whereof reads as under:6. levy of tax on sale or purchase of goods.-(1) every dealer whose total turnover for a ..... . it filed a writ petition, inter alia, contending:k. if sro no. 82/2006 seeks to amend and enhance the rate of tax on pesticides and insecticides from 4% to 12.5%, it is ultra-vires the provisions of kvat act and void and illegal. this is so, because by virtue of 6(1)(d), the entry and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2009 (SC)

Ajoy Kumar Ghose Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-18-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC2282; 2009CriLJ2824; JT2009(4)SC245; 2009(4)SCALE267; 2009(3)LC1357(SC)

..... k. paul. however, the court directed filing of complaint against the appellant who was also a member of the governing council, since he happened to be the acting director of the indian school of mines, dhanbad, at the relevant time. the high court, however, included in the array of accused, shri vikram prasad, assistant inspector general of ..... (r) and alleged therein that on 31.03.1989, no head of the department was the member of the general council and without observing the procedure of amendment to the rules as laid down under section 23, mischievous efforts had been made by the chairman, director and the registrar for getting new sets of rules ..... registered under the societies registration act. he further alleged that services of one shri a.k. singh, estate-cum-security officer were availed of for liaison work and thus the amendment was without the resolution of the general council and without the approval of the government of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (SC)

G.S. Iqbal Vs. K.M. Khadar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Reported in : AIR2009SC2116; JT2009(5)SC266; 2009(4)SCALE626; (2009)11SCC398; 2009(3)LC1390(SC):2009AIRSCW2702

..... tniuml even after his election, he has even otherwise incurred disqualification under the tenth schedule.26. tenth schedule was added in the constitution by the constitution (52nd amendment) act, 1985 whereby the provisions as to disqualification on the ground of defection have been made part of the constitution itself.27. paragraph 2 of the tenth schedule, ..... candidate. having considered the matter thoughtfully, we find no justifiable reason to take a view different from that of designated election judge.15. tamil nadu indian union muslim league (tniuml) was not registered political party in tamil nadu in so far as the 14th lok sabha election is concerned within the meaning of ..... not a valid member of dmk party on the date of filing of nomination papers as he continued to be member of tamil nadu indian union muslim league which is state unit of indian union muslim league. learned counsel would submit that the returned candidate was member of two political parties at the time of filing the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (SC)

Binani Zinc Limited Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Reported in : 2009AIRSCW2458; 2009LC(SC)1; JT2009(5)SC162; 2009(3)SCALE849; (2009)11SCC244; 2009(3)LC1474(SC)

..... ) the electricity generation, transmission, distribution and supply are conducted on commercial principles;(g) national power plans formulated by the central government;sections 51 and 52 read as under:section 51 - amendment of act 54 of 1948 -with effect from such date as the central government may, by notification, in the official gazette appoint, sub-section (2) of section 43a of the electricity ..... into force, must be understood.33. we must also notice that the electricity (supply) act, 1998 was not repealed by the erc act, 1998. it was only under section 185 of the electricity act of 2003 that the provisions of the indian electricity act 1910, electricity (supply act 1948 and the erc act 1998 were repealed. but at the same time anything done or any action taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 19 2009 (SC)

Veena Corp. Through Rajan Babulal Mehta Vs. Ashok Arjanbhai Jolia and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-19-2009

Reported in : JT2009(5)SC357; 2009(4)SCALE636; (2009)12SCC344:2009AIRSCW3695

..... 14th june, 2007, could not be complied with, the division bench by its order dated 13th march, 2008, impugned herein, directed the s.r.a. to act and ensure that the amended plan is fully implemented and the entire area measuring 225 sq. ft. was constructed and delivered to the respondent nos. 1 and 2 herein within a period of ..... the flour mill of respondent nos. 1 and 2, the petitioner can object to raising the construction as per the amended plan upon contending that the same was contrary to the building rules and was not, therefore, capable of being acted upon.15. the fact situation in this case is quite simple. upon adjudication by the sra it has been ..... was competent to do so, there could be no further objection on the part of the petitioner to act in terms of the amended plan and to provide the respondent nos. 1 and 2 with the alternate accommodation as provided for under the amended plan.20. we, therefore, see no merit in the special leave petition, which is accordingly dismissed. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //