Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: indian boilers amendment act 2007 section 10 amendment of section 9 Court: kerala Year: 1961 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.430 seconds)

Dec 07 1961 (HC)

Peirce Leslie and Co. Ltd., Kozhikode Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Kozhiko ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-07-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker220; (1962)IILLJ169Ker

..... save with the express permission in writing of the conciliation officer, board or tribunal as the case may be.' 20. section 33, as it now stands, was incorporated by the amendment act 36 of 1956 and is as follows :'33. conditions of service etc. to remain unchanged under certain circumstances during pendency of proceedings : -- (1) during the pendency of any ..... 3 decisions which have a bearing on this matter namely, a decision of the bombay high court in air 1960 bom 390; the decision of the gujarat high court in indian extractions private ltd. v. a. v. vyas, air 1961 gujarat 22; and of the rajasthan high court in 1959-2 lab lj 810.53. no doubt, the ..... t. officer, air 1961 sc 372, where their lordships had to consider the scope of section 34 of the indian income-tax act. no doubt, the expression 'unless' occurs in the proviso to section 34(1) of the income-tax act. having regard to the general scheme of that section, their lordships held that to confer jurisdiction under the said section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 1961 (HC)

T. Bapputty Vs. Government of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-06-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker69; [1961]12STC722(Ker)

..... the course of inter-state trade or commerce, within the meaning of article 286(2) prior to it amendment by the constitution (sixth amendment) act, 1956, even if the buyer bought the goods solely for transporting them outside the state and did transport them. indian standard wagon co's case, 1958-9 stc 553 : (air 1960 cal 25) is urged to ..... be doubtful, in view of what been held by a division bench of the same high court in indian standard wagon ..... co. ltd, v. commercial tax officer, 1960-11 stc 47 : (air 1960 cal 424). we feel the correct legal position to be between the two arguments. it is clear that parliament had not enacted in the central sales tax act something different to what courts had earlier .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 1961 (HC)

Macki Fernandez Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-01-1961

Reported in : (1961)IILLJ486Ker

..... evidence produced by the defence and the accused shall not be entitled to an adjournment on this ground. 68. section 19 gives power to the commissioner to amend the articles of charge. power is also given to adjourn the inquiry from time to time. 69. section 20 enjoins the commissioner, after the close of ..... in exercise of any specific statutory powers or administrative rules. 109. after making the above observations, his lordship considers the position of the members of the indian civil service and ultimately holds: but the guarantee being one of an enquiry directed under one of two alternative powers, the exercise of authority under one of ..... the government is invested with authority to direct an enquiry in one of two alternative modes and by directing an enquiry under the, public servants (inquiries) act, which act, it is submitted, contains more stringent provisions when against another public servant similarly circumstanced an enquiry under rule 55 may be directed. article 14 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 1961 (HC)

Chacko Mathew Vs. Ayyappan Kutty

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-19-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker164

..... on the tarwad and not, as is expressly stated, as against others. this principle must, in my, opinion, equally apply to section 33 of the madras marumakkathayam act as amended, as also to similar provisions in the analogous statutes adverted to above.'34. raghavan j. in omanakulty pillai v. krishnan nair, 1961 ker lt 626 considering the ..... agreements may be classed together as invalid.'9. the relation between hie terms void' and 'viodable' is succinctly expressed by pollock and mulla in their commentary on indian contract act, 8th edn., pages 383 and 135 thus:'whenever one party to a contract hag the option of annulling it, the contrast is voidable; and when he makes ..... suit by him to have the instrument set aside or cancelled would then be time-barred under either article 44 or article 91 of the indian limitation act ....... section 3 of the indian limitation act refers only to the remedy of the plaintiff and not to his rights, and even though the remedy may be barred, the right may .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 1961 (HC)

P. Kunhiraman Vs. V.R. Krishna Iyer

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-28-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker190

..... the original sub-sections (4) and (5) of section 23 became unnecessary and as such those two sub-sections were deleted by section 2 of the amendment act of 1961. therefore after the amendments so effected, there will be a right of appeal to a party against orders passed of her under section 22 or under section 23 of the ..... 22 referred to earlier.43. but it is to be noted that by a recent amendment of the act in september, 1961 namely. the representation of the people (amendment) act, 196.1 -- act 40/1961, section 24 his been newly incorporated by section 3 of the amendment act giving a right of appeal against orders passed under both seotions 22 and 23. clause ..... 184 that battle can be fought 'either beforehand in the registration court or after the election upon a scrutiny.'12. many decisions other than those mentioned above, english and indian, were cited before us. none of them is of any great assistance in deciding the question before us.13. one of them jujhar singh v. bhairon lall, 7 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1961 (HC)

The Asiatic Government Security Fire and General Assurance Co. Ltd., M ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-15-1961

Reported in : AIR1965Ker214

..... was to take marine insurance policies out of section 135 and provide for them in the new section 135a.6. the bill that became the transfer of property (amendment) act, 1944 was l. a. bill no. 9 of 1944. the statement of objects and reasons appended to that bill, gazette of india, part v dated the 19thfebruary 1944 dealt with ..... yarn (p) ltd. v. indian national steamship co. ltd., air 1964 cal 362, also a case under sub-section (3) of section 135a. in between these two decisions, mukherjee j. took a contrary view in ..... law would not give theinsurer a right to sue in a court of law in his ownname.'15. to the same effect is the decision of mitter j. in indian trade and general insurance co. ltd. v. union of india, air 1957 cal 190, a case under sub-section (3) of section 135a; and of mitra j. in textiles and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1961 (HC)

Standard Motor Union (Private) Ltd., Ettumanoor and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-16-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker298

..... for the petitioners and the learned advocate general on behalf of the state, i will advert to the salient features of the travancore tolls recovery act --act iv of 1088 as amended by act iii/1098, because an alternative contention has been raised by the state that the notification, which is under attack, can in any event, be ..... within their jurisdiction. (d) all vehicles and machinery belonging to the t. c. government excluding those of the state transport department. (e) all vehicles belonging to the indian or international red cross. (f) all vehicles, belonging to the defence department of the government of india. (g) all vehicles belonging to all foreign embassies of the ..... consider the question as to whether there has been an excessive delegation of legislative authority under section 11 (1) of the madras commercial crops markets act -- act 20 of 1933 as amended by act 33 of 1955. under the said section, power was given to the market committee to levy a cess by way of sales tax on any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1961 (HC)

C.T. George Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-25-1961

Reported in : [1961]12STC807(Ker)

..... question which arises in this case is whether section 18-a is applicable to the facts of this case. the assessment relates to the year ending 31st march, 1951. the amending act vi of 1951, introducing section 18-a was passed subsequent to 31st march, 1951. it is an established principle of construction that unless a provision in a statute is made ..... income-tax can question the validity of the assessment either in whole or in part. the provisions in the madras general sales tax act are analogous to these provisions in the indian income-tax act. two cases under the income-tax act may now be considered. raleigh investment co. ltd. v. governor-general in council [1947] 15 i.t.r. 332. in that case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 1961 (HC)

The Bank of Meenachil Ltd. Vs. Chacko Chacko Kalayakkathil and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-11-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker333; [1962]32CompCas953(Ker)

..... wound up, shall also apply to a banking company in respect of which a petition for the winding up has been presented before the commencement of the banking companies (amendment) act, 1953.' it is said that sub-section (1) applies to this case, the application being an application by a banking company which is being wound up and ..... which they alleged that certain sums were due from the directors named in the report and prayed that proceedings may be started against them under section 235 of the indian companies act 1913. the present application was brought on 22-5-1958, and, obviously with an eye on limitation, professes to be in continuation of report no. 10 ..... for limitation for banking companies that are being wound up. this section runs as follows:'45-o. (1) notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the indian limitation act,1908 or in any other taw for the time being in force, in computing the period of limitation prescribed for a suit or application by a banking company .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1961 (HC)

Krishna Menon Vs. Narayana Ayyar and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-30-1961

Reported in : AIR1962Ker21

..... to be actionable, can only give rise to damages against that defendant. even then to support such a claim, different averments would be necessary, and permission to amend the plaint cannot now be given because the claim has now become barred.in any case, there is no sufficient evidence to show ext. a having been proved ..... failure to comply with such a collateral agreement would justify the appellant being given damages. he has also argued that the appellant should be given an opportunity to amend the plaint and sue on the collateral security contained in the letter by the 2nd defendant. the position 'taken up by the respondent's learned advocate is ..... the excise rules of the state to be void. we feel that section 24 of the cochin contract act being similar to section 23 of the indian contract act, there was no necessityto expressly provide that contracts in contravention of the abkari act would be void. agreements calculated to defeat the object of any enactment would be void, and therefore .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //