Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... no.432/2013 c/w crl.p. no.2313/2016 decided on0311.2016: sri. 114 katta subrananya naidu and another vs. state of karnataka. xv) (2003) 3 scc57 commissioner of income tax vs. hindustan bulk carriers. xvi) (2002) 5 scc738 shashikant singh vs. tarkeshwar singh and another. xvii) (2013) 7 scc653 lily thomas vs. union of india and others. ..... same is the mandate under section 17(1) of the pml act. hence, he has prayed for allowing the writ petitions. he has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions: i) (2008)14 scc186 aslam mohammad merchant vs competent authority & others. ii) (1976)3 scc757 income tax officer vs lakhmani mewal das. iii) (2008)2 scc302 raman ..... sheet has been filed on 25.05.2013 for the offence 87 punishable under section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of pc act alleging that he had amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income. it is also contended that house has been constructed and the predicate offence was not a schedule offence under the pml .....
Tag this Judgment!