Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the subject of the charge. this inference flows from the general arrangement of the provisions in the income tax act, where under each head of income the charging provision is accompanied by a set of provisions for computing the income subject to that charge. the character of the computation provisions in each case bears a relationship to ..... respondent (by shri. t.suryanarayana, senior advocate for ms. tanmayee rajkumar, advocate) this strp is filed under sec.65(1) of the karnataka value added tax act, 2003, against the judgment dated2911.2021 passed in sta no.40/2021 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing the appeal and setting ..... 034. represented by mr. anil gupta -manager accounts respondent (by shri. p.b.harish, advocate) this strp is filed under section651) of karnataka value added tax act, 2003 against the common judgment dated1401.2022 passed in sta nos.262/2017, 264/2017 and2662017 on the file of the karnataka appellate tribunal at bengaluru, allowing .....
Tag this Judgment!