Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: income tax act 1961 section 155 other amendments Court: jharkhand Page 12 of about 128 results (0.090 seconds)

Spicy Beverages Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2003(4)JCR442(Jhr)]

..... and other equipments for manufacture and whole sale supply;(v) details for procurement of necessary fund; and(vi) the following documents : (a) income tax clearance certificate;(b) sales tax clearance certificate from the place where it is gestered as a dealer;(c) character certificate from the concerned district magistrate certifying the permanent place of ..... disposed of on 20th august, 2003, wherein the court upheld the jurisdiction of board of revenue to grant privilege under section 22-d of the bihar excise act. 1915.15. there is no dispute that the stringent condition of submission of documents, information, etc. are mandatory. the only question arises whether the petitioner ..... the form 18 and submitted before the authorities in supported of its address.the provision of submission of sales tax clearance certificate cannot be made applicable for a company not registered under the sales tax act. in this background, a similar provision was struck down by a division bench of this court by its .....

Ms Express Infratech Pvt Limited Through One of Its Directors Sri Pank ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of this writ petition; (e) looking to the revised returns filed by this petitioner under central sales tax act, it reveals that the inter-state purchase of capital goods have been made; and also (f) looking to the returns of income/balance-sheet/ audit report filed by this petitioner, there is a reference of purchase of capital goods ..... once capital goods are purchased for mining purposes and there is a provision of amendment in the certificate of registration under section 25(4) of the jharkhand valued added tax act, 2005 to be read with rules 7 and 12 of the central sales (registration & turnover) rules, 1957, we hereby, direct the respondents to carry out that ..... -1 to the memo of this writ petition whereas, amendment application has been preferred in the year, 2013 and therefore, the certificate of registration under central sales tax act cannot be amended with retrospective effect. 4 6. counsel for the state has relied upon the decision reported in 97 stc102(pat.). on the basis of the .....

Mithilesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... high court, which was also dismissed.10. similarly, investigation was conducted in respect of the role being played by the income tax authority and cbdt. the cbi did find acts and omission on the part of shri a.c.chaudhary, the then commissioner of income tax, ranchi and, thereby, he was charge sheeted and has also been convicted in r.c. no. 20(a)/1996 .....

Mahabir Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... of honorarium/special remuneration through cheques 5 amounting to rs.92,995/- and after receiving the aforesaid amount, the petitioner has paid 30 per cent of the aforesaid amount towards income tax. the submission of the petitioner has not been controverted by the respondents in the counter affidavit and therefore, the averment of the petitioner goes un-challenged on the ground of ..... between the two states becomes meaningful. if, therefore, the state of bihar has, in its possession, any material against a government servant who, by virtue of section 74 of the act, is now in the service of the state of jharkhand and if the state of bihar thinks that such material warrants initiation of an action against such a person, it .....

Banapidi Bunkar Sahyog Samitte Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

..... investigation, new delhi 11. the central bureau of investigation 12. the chairman-cum-managing direcor, icici lombard, mumbai 13. the director (investigation), income tax department, ranchi 14. the additional director (investigation), income tax department, ranchi 15. the director, enforcement directorate, new delhi 16. the additional director, enforcement directorate, new delhi 17. manzoor ahmed ansari 18. ..... issued a notification dated 10.03.2015 bearing memo no. 1374 in exercise of power conferred by section-6 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 and conveyed the pleasure of the governor of jharkhand to accord consent to the extension of powers and jurisdiction of the members of delhi ..... has issued notification dated 19.07.2017 in exercise of its power conferred by section 5(1) and 6 of the delhi special police establishment act, 1946 and extended the -3- power and jurisdiction of the members of the delhi special police establishment to the whole state of jharkhand for .....

Surya Sonal Singh Vs. Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Jharkhand

..... of rupees one crore was advanced to surya sonal singh, present petitioner. learned senior counsel has also referred to the information obtained from the income tax department under the right to information act to substantiate his contention that balance sheet was indeed filed. it has been stated that only on assumption and presumption, petitioner has been implicated ..... has been levelled that the loan amount of rupees one crore was not reflected in the income tax returns of surya sonal singh. it has further been alleged that the statement of ankita singh was recorded under section 50 of the act wherein she had confirmed of giving loan to her brother of rupees one crore in two ..... installments of rs.50 lacs each. investigation also revealed that the said loan was never reflected in income tax returns of ankita singh. in view of the statement of .....

Narendra Mohan Singh Vs. Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Jharkhand

..... and an amount of rupees one crore was advanced to surya sonal singh. learned senior counsel has also referred to the information obtained from the income tax department under the right to information act to substantiate his contention that balance sheet was indeed filed. it has been stated that only on assumption and presumption, petitioner has been implicated ..... has been levelled that the loan amount of rupees one crore was not reflected in the income tax returns of surya sonal singh. it has further been alleged that the statement of ankita singh was recorded under section 50 of the act wherein she had confirmed of giving loan to her brother of rupees one crore in two ..... installments of rs.50 lacs each. investigation also revealed that the said loan was never reflected in income tax returns of ankita singh. in view of the statement of ankita .....

Mahesh Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court : Jharkhand

..... but, there are several cases in which the complainant and the victim are different personality like income tax officer may a complainant or labour commissioner office may a complainant or sometimes food inspector under the provisions of food 5 adulteration act may be the complainant, but, they are not the victim and, therefore, if these type ..... code of criminal procedure, before this court because these types of complainants have no statutory right to prefer an appeal under proviso to section 372, because, income tax officer or factory inspector or food inspector or labour commissioner officer are not the victims, therefore, no statutory right to prefer an appeal is given to ..... to both the aforesaid provisions i.e. sections 372 and 378(4), when the complainant is not the victim like in the case, an officer of the income-tax department, or the labour department or the food adulteration department, etc, though they have preferred the complaint case, but, the victims are somebody else, in those .....

Santosh Shah Alias Santosh Chowdhury Vs. Union of India Through the Ce ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of corruption act in connection with r.c. ac1 2017 a0003(rc3a)/2017 d), pending in the court of special judge, cbi, ranchi.3. the allegation in the first information report is that one tapas kumar dutta, principal commissioner of income tax, ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other income tax officers and other ..... persons and, thereafter, transferred the income tax files of several assesses from kolkata to ranchi and hazaribagh. as a part of the said conspiracy, ..... main accused tapas kumar dutta, while he was setting aside the original assessment orders. thus, case of this petitioner cannot be equated with the income tax officers and thus is absolutely different.10. though charge sheet has already been submitted in this case, but seeing the involvement of this petitioner and .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kamkap (India) Jamshedpur

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi i.a. no. 7018 of 2013 in tax appeal no. 4 of 2006 commissioner of income tax, jamshedpur appellant versus kamkap (india), jamshedpur respondent coram: hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta for the appellant : mr. deepak roshan, advocate for the respondent : ms. amrita sinha, advocate 07/dated: 18 th september, 2013 per d.n. patel, a.c.j.:1. having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, it appears that there is delay of a day in preferring this tax appeal. looking to the reasons stated in this interlocutory application, the delay is, hereby, condoned. 2. accordingly, i.a. no. 7018 of 2013 stands allowed and disposed of. t.a. no. 4 of 2006 registry is directed to enlist t.a. no. 4 of 2006 on the board of admission on 21st october, 2013. (d.n. patel, a.c.j.) (amitav k. gupta, j.) ajay/chandan