Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2002(3)KarLJ433
..... the petitioner by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent herein has filed the revision petition before the 3rd respondent under section 136(3) of the karnataka land revenue act. the deputy commissioner has allowed the revision by his order dated 15-11-2000 cancelling the mutation sanctioned by the 2nd respondent in favour of the petitioner. ..... petitioner. therefore, taking into consideration all these facts and circumstances of the case, the order passed by the deputy commissioner is contrary to the relevant provisions of the act and the same is not sustainable in the eyes of law. hence, he prayed that the impugned, order may be set aside.5. per contra, the learned ..... mutation sanctioned in favour of the petitioner by the 2nd respondent which is contrary to the relevant provisions of the act. it is pertinent to note here itself as per section 128 of the karnataka land revenue act the petitioner shall report either orally or in writing the acquisition of her right in respect of the land .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 2004(4)KarLJ180
..... was issued to file objections; that objections were filed by the landowners, and after considering the same, the final notification under section 28(4) of the act has been issued.8. smt. shobha patil, learned additional government advocate for the 4th respondent-director of industries and commerce and smt. s. sujatha, learned ..... the material on record and the arguments held that the acquisition is for information technology park, which is an industrial infrastructural facility as defined under the act and the acquisition is for a public purpose. the learned single judge repelled the argument that the real purpose is not notified in the preliminary ..... 2001 (annexure-a to the writ petition) issued by the 1st respondent under section 3(1) of the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act 18 of 1966) (for short, 'the act'). by the said notification, the 1st respondent declared the area wherein the appellant-petitioner's land was situated as 'industrial area'. simultaneously .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : (1974)IILLJ396Kant
..... viz., 'other additional remuneration, if any, paid at intervals not exceeding two months'.6. the term 'wages' has been defined thus in section 2(27) of the act:'wages' means all remuneration paid or payable in cash to an employee, if the terms of the contract of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled and includes any payment ..... by the employer was not in pursuance of the terms of employment, express or implied, and consequently the said payment cannot be termed as ''wages' under the act,5. sri ranganna, learned counsel for the appellant conceded before us that the incentive payments nude by the company in the instant case is in no way different ..... hereinafter called 'the company') and declaring that the incentive payments made by the company to its employees under the incentive scheme are not 'wages' as defined under the act and that esi contributions are not to be levied on such payments.2. esi scheme was applied to the different units of the company in different years. the company .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1985Kant228; ILR1985KAR1277; 1985(2)KarLJ115
..... interest charged by banks. 10. it seems to us, that learned counsel may not be correct in his submission. sec. 21a introduced by the banking laws (amendment) act, 1983, (act no. i of 1984) reads as follows:'21 a. rates of interest charged by banking companies not to be subject to scrutiny by courts. - notwithstanding anything contained ..... to prescribe or regulate the interest rate structure on advances or other financial accommodation to be made by commercial banks. s. 46(4) of the banking regulation act confers power on the reserve bank to impose penalty for contravention of its order, rule or direction. the interest charged by banks on transactions should therefore be in ..... in violation of the direction of the direction of the reserve bank, the court could give relief to the aggrieved party notwithstanding s. 21a of the banking regulation act. the interest charge beyond the rate prescribed by the reserve bank would be illegal and void. we cannot, therefore, allow the claim of the bank on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : 1997(57)ECC188; 1994LC492(Karnataka); 1992(58)ELT66(Kar)
..... -1986 and 14-10-1987. during this period he was served with the notice, regarding certain proceedings to confiscate gold and levy penalty under the provisions of the customs act and gold control act. the petitioner did not send any reply; his counsel wrote a letter to the collector stating that the petitioner was in prison and the proceedings may be postponed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1994KAR304; 1994(2)KarLJ357
..... karnataka essential commodities licensing order, 1986 is challenged. two grievances are voiced. the first grievance is that the said licensing order issued under the essential commodities act does not empower the authorities to seize and remove the entire stock of essential commodity if the grievance is made against a part of such stock which according ..... the seizing authority, he has ample remedy of approaching the collector or deputy commissioner, as the case may be, under section 6-a of the essential commodities act seeking appropriate orders. as laid down in sub-section (2) of section 6-a thereof, in appropriate cases the collector, in connection with the commodity which ..... before the competent authority. consequently, it cannot be said that there is absence of any provision for -safeguarding the interest of the stock holders under the act. the second grievance also, therefore, fails as it has no substance.5. since there is no substance in the grievances sought to be made out, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : II(1998)ACC163; [1996(73)FLR1473]; ILR1996KAR1829; (1997)IILLJ1170Kant
..... by the commissioner for workmen's compensation ('the commissioner' for short) granting compensation of rs. 18,469/- to the respondent under the workmen's compensation act ('the act' for short). 2. the appellant has challenged the impugned award of the commissioner on three grounds; namely, the commissioner had erred in holding that : ..... : ii ................' the 'partial disablement' resulting from an employment injury contemplated under section 4(1)(c) is definition by section 2(1)(g) of the act, thus : ''partial disablement means where the disablement is of a temporary nature, such disablement as reduces the earning capacity of 2i a workman in any employment ..... respect of non-schedule injury caused to a workman. section 4(1)(c)(ii) runs thus : '4. amount of compensation : (1) subject to the provisions this act, the amount of compensation shall be as follows, namely : (a) .............. (b) .............. (c) where permanent partial disablement results from the injury (i) ............ (ii .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1999KAR1064; 2000(3)KarLJ157
..... rural sector.......indisputably commercial banks and rrbs carry on similar banking business and participate in the development of rural economy as partners in the rural development acting as instrumentalities of the state in accordance with the directive principles of the constitution. establishment of rrbs is to fill in the vacuum in the economic ..... of india. the government would pass appropriate orders determining the remuneration of all the employees of the regional rural banks in terms of the provisions of rrb act. it is contended by respondents 1 and 2 that in the above circumstances, the filing of the writ petition is premature and is not maintainable and ..... that of the commercial banks and rrbs carry on similar banking business and participate in the development of rural economy as partners in the rural development acting as instrumentalities of the state in accordance with the directive principles of the constitution and it would be unjust and unreasonable to deny the rrb employees .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2000KAR4385; 2001(3)KarLJ292
..... observation made by the hon'ble supreme court, report made by the mahesh hegde committee, section 14 of the karnataka education (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984, the collective responsibility for arriving at proper conclusion.15. the file further indicate that as a matter of fact respondent 6 was made chairman. ..... on such scrutiny. but, the members of the committee, have failed to do the same and thereby, they are jointly and severally responsible for the acts of the selection scrutiny committee'.while concluding, the upalokayukta has recommended to initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondent 6 and also directed to debar respondents from taking ..... expected'.the upalokayukta has also observed as under.-'in terms of the provision under section 14 of the karnataka educational institutions (prohibition of capitation fee) act, 1984, the selection scrutiny committee was required to scrutinise all the documents required to be produced by the candidates and was required to take a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR2001Kant510; 2002(3)KarLJ430
..... always open to the petitioners to raise such of those questions as are open to the petitioners before the very arbitrator and in accordance with the provisions of the act and cannot be made a ground for judicial review of the order appointing an arbitrator and for issue of a writ of certiorari under article 226 of the constitution ..... parties are left with no remedy to redress their grievance. it has been pointed out in the said decision that under the provisions of sections 13 and 16 of the act, the question as to the qualifications, impartiality and jurisdiction of the arbitrator who has been appointed under the impugned order, can be raised before the very arbitrator and ..... , j.1. in this writ petition, the petitioner, a partnership firm who had been arrayed as a respondent in an application filed under section 11 of the arbitration act by the respondent in this writ petition and which application had been ordered by the learned single judge of this court as per order dated 14-7-2000 in c .....
Tag this Judgment!