Court : Karnataka
..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of a ..... said rule. rule 8-m requires that system of working in quarries in sheet rock shall be - 220 - performed by formation of benches as per the metalliferous mines regulations, 1961. rule 8-n provides for separate stacking of non-saleable minerals. rule 8-o requires the holders of lease or licence to employ the qualified persons as mentioned in the ..... larger bench are as follows:1. whether royalty determined under sections 9/15(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax?.2. can the state legislature while levying a tax on land under list ii entry 49 of the seventh schedule of the constitution adopt a measure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of a ..... said rule. rule 8-m requires that system of working in quarries in sheet rock shall be - 220 - performed by formation of benches as per the metalliferous mines regulations, 1961. rule 8-n provides for separate stacking of non-saleable minerals. rule 8-o requires the holders of lease or licence to employ the qualified persons as mentioned in the ..... larger bench are as follows:1. whether royalty determined under sections 9/15(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax?.2. can the state legislature while levying a tax on land under list ii entry 49 of the seventh schedule of the constitution adopt a measure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of a ..... said rule. rule 8-m requires that system of working in quarries in sheet rock shall be - 220 - performed by formation of benches as per the metalliferous mines regulations, 1961. rule 8-n provides for separate stacking of non-saleable minerals. rule 8-o requires the holders of lease or licence to employ the qualified persons as mentioned in the ..... larger bench are as follows:1. whether royalty determined under sections 9/15(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax?.2. can the state legislature while levying a tax on land under list ii entry 49 of the seventh schedule of the constitution adopt a measure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of a ..... said rule. rule 8-m requires that system of working in quarries in sheet rock shall be - 220 - performed by formation of benches as per the metalliferous mines regulations, 1961. rule 8-n provides for separate stacking of non-saleable minerals. rule 8-o requires the holders of lease or licence to employ the qualified persons as mentioned in the ..... larger bench are as follows:1. whether royalty determined under sections 9/15(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax?.2. can the state legislature while levying a tax on land under list ii entry 49 of the seventh schedule of the constitution adopt a measure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... view to ensure the public safety and other allied matters. the apex court observed that no law can be declared to be unreasonable because there is a reduction in the income of the citizen on account of regulation of business. in paragraph 7 and 10, the apex court held thus: 7. thus right or power of the owner of a ..... said rule. rule 8-m requires that system of working in quarries in sheet rock shall be - 220 - performed by formation of benches as per the metalliferous mines regulations, 1961. rule 8-n provides for separate stacking of non-saleable minerals. rule 8-o requires the holders of lease or licence to employ the qualified persons as mentioned in the ..... larger bench are as follows:1. whether royalty determined under sections 9/15(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957, as amended) is in the nature of tax?.2. can the state legislature while levying a tax on land under list ii entry 49 of the seventh schedule of the constitution adopt a measure of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
..... much, relatively speaking, that the lawyers were willing to forgo their livelihoods rather than return to work. by sacrificing income that they actually desired, and thus inflicting hardship on themselves as well as on the city, the lawyers demonstrated ..... antitrust laws under our decision in eastern railroad presidents conference v. noerr motor freight, inc., 365 u. s. 127 (1961); and that it was a form of political action protected by the first amendment under our decision in naacp v. claiborne ..... randall, 357 u. s. 513 (1958), for example, we invalidated a state program under which taxpayers applying for a certain tax exemption bore the burden of proving that they did not advocate the overthrow of the united states government. we held that the ..... the lawyers' compensation. the questions presented are whether the lawyers' concerted conduct violated 5 of the federal trade commission act and if so, whether it was nevertheless protected by the first amendment to the constitution. [ footnote 1 ] i .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... cut down the generality of the meaning of the preceding provision. supreme court, in commissioner of income tax vs. eli lilly company (india) private ltd. (2009) 15 scc1 in the context of section 201(1) and section 201(1a) of the income tax act, 1961 also held that such words mean that the provisions of both the sub- sections are to be ..... considered independently without affecting the rights mentioned in either of the sub-sections.41. chapter-iv of the drugs act in which section 26a is placed contains section 16 regarding ..... 454 petitions impugn the 344 notifications dated 10th march, 2016 of the government of india, all in exercise of power under section 26a of the drugs and cosmetics act, 1940 (drugs act) in respect of 344 fixed dose combination (fdc) drugs and seek to prohibit the respondents union w.p.(c) no.2212/2016 & 453 other connected .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it is further contended that, the complainants and their associates have committed serious economic offences and violated the provisions of companies act, pmla, sebi act, rbi act and income tax act and given their clout and influence the matter needed court monitored multi disciplinary investigation. the issues in respect of the same along ..... of corporate affairs, has taken into consideration all the materials including information collected by the sfio, the enforcement directorate, banks, income tax department, statutory auditors, cbi, commissioner of service tax, regional provident fund commissioner and having analysed the said documents, has come to an irrefutable conclusion that the motive behind ..... in the writ petition no.3635/2020, thereby he has given up all his professional ethics as contemplated under the provisions of the advocates act, 1961. being an advocate and party-in-person, accused no.2 has misused the process of the court and harassed the complainants and others repeatedly .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... compensation to a person who has suffered loss or damage to his property or grievous hurt or to the legal heirs of any person who was no more alive. the income tax act, 1961 [section 10(bc)].permits deduction of an amount received crm-790-ma-2010 final - 34 - or receivable from the central or state government or a local authority by an individual ..... act 2. indian electricity act 3. indian medical degrees act 4. official secrets act 5. reserve bank of india act 6. payment of wages act 7. agricultural produce (grading and marking) act 8. insurance act 9. coffee act 10. industrial disputes act 11. damodar valley corporation act 12. dentists act 13. dock workers (regulation of employment) act 14. electricity (supply) act 15. employees state insurance act 16. factories act 17. industrial finance corporation act 18. banking regulatio act .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... anr. [(2000) 3 scc 224], the short question which was to be decided by this court was whether having regard to the provisions contained in maternity benefit act, 1961, women engaged on casual basis or on muster roll basis on daily wages and not only those in regular employment were eligible for maternity leave. the court ..... had also received written applications from almost 340 women employees requesting the management to permit them to work in night shift so that they can earn additional income and/or can come for work at their convenient timings. the petitioners, by communication dated 1st august 2012 addressed to the director of industrial safety and ..... europe" and that "very weighty reasons would have to be advanced before a difference of treatment on the ground of sex could be regarded as compatible with the convention" (loc. cit., p. 38, para. 78)." (emphasis supplied) (see also schuler-zgraggen v. swizerland, [1993] echr 29; and petrovic v. austria, [1998] echr 21) stereotype .....
Tag this Judgment!