Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1992Cal250,(1992)1CALLT335(HC),[1993]76CompCas292(Cal)
ORDERAltamas Kabir, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 8th October, 1985, passed by a learned single Judge of this Court on an application filed on behalf of the defendant No. 5 in Suit No. 296 of 1980, dismissing the said application, upon holding that the point sought to be raised by the defendant No. 5 could well be taken in his written statement and the trial Court could decide the point, if urged, at the hearing of the suit.2. Certain interesting points of law have been raised in this appeal, which has been preferred by the defendant No. 5 in the suit, which makes it necessary for us to set out the material facts leading to the filing of the above-mentioned application in the suit.3. The defendant No. 1 in the suit, National Rubber ., is an existing company within the meaning of the Companies Act, 1956. The defendant No. 5 claims to be the Managing Director of the defendant No. 1 company.4. The defendant No. ! owned two factories and/or undertakings,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1998Cal218
ORDERSamaresh Banerjea, J.1. This is an application under An. 227 of the Constitution challenging the order No. 63 dated April 28, 1997 passed by the learned Judge, Second Court, City Civil Court, Calcutta, in Commercial Execution Case No. 24 of 1989 issuing prohibitory order upon garnishee.2. The opposite party No. 1 obtained a decree for money in Commercial Suit No. 8 of 1984 on 19th of Sept. 1985 against Inchek Tyres Limited and National Rubber Manufacturers Limited and thereafter in that execution case the present petitioner Tyre Corporation of Indi a Limited was added as (sic) present Corporation after nationalisation of the aforesaid Inchek Tyre and National Rubber Manufacturers Limited is the successor of the aforesaid two companies, in the aforesaid Execution case, being Commercial Case No. 8 of 1984, the present petitioner made an application on 15th of March, 1995 for suspension of the Execution case, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner company had been declared sic...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3453/2002 JINDAL STAINLESS LTD.& ANR. Appellants VS. STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. Respondents WITH C.A. No.6383-6421/1997, C.A. No.6422-6435/1997, C.A. No.6436/1997, C.A. No.6437-6440/1997 , C.A. No.3381-3400/1998, C.A. No.4651/1998, C.A. No.918/1999, C.A. No.2769/2000, C.A. No.4471/2000, C.A. No.3314/2001, C.A. No.3454/2002, C.A. No.3455/2002, C.A. No.3456-3459/2002, C.A. No.3460/2002, C.A. No.3461/2002, C.A. No.3462-3463/2002, C.A. No.3464/2002, C.A. No.3465/2002, C.A. No.3466/2002, C.A. No.3467/2002, C.A. No.3468/2002, C.A. No.3469/2002, C.A. No.3470/2002, C.A. No.3471/2002, C.A. No.4008/2002, C.A. No.5385/2002, C.A. No.5740/2002, C.A. No.5858/2002, W.P.(C) No.512/2003, W.P.(C) No.574/2003, C.A. No.2608/2003, C.A. No.2633/2003, C.A. No.2637/2003, C.A. No.2638/2003, C.A. No.3720-3722/2003, C.A. No.6331/2003, C.A. No.8241/2003, C.A. No.8242/2003, C.A. No.8243/2003, C.A. No.8244/2003, C.A. No.8245/2003, C.A. No.8246/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1
1. I propose to divide my judgment into eight parts. Part I will deal with Introduction; Part II with interpretation of Golakhnath case; Part III with the interpretation of the original Article 368, as it existed prior to its amendment; Part IV with the validity of the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act; Part V with the validity of Section 2 of the Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act; Part VI with the validity of Section 3 of the Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act; Part VII with Constitution (Twenty- ninth Amendment) Act; and Part VIII with conclusions.PART I-Introduction2. All the six writ petitions involve common questions as to the validity of the Twenty- fourth, Twenty-fifth and Twenty-ninth Amendments of the Constitution. I may give a few facts in Writ petition No. 135 of 1970 to show how the question arises in this petition. Writ Petition No. 135 of 1970 was filed by the petitioner on March 21, 1970 under Article 32 of the Constitution for enforcement of his ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :30. h May, 2019 Date of decision :8. h July, 2019 + CS (OS) 410/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, 1MG TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. versus Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. .....Defendants Ishani Chandra and Ms. Shubhie Wahi, Advocates for D-1 (M:8130910708) Mr. Sudarshan Rajan and Mr. Ramesh Rawat, D-2. (M:9990865829) WITH Advocates for + CS (OS) 453/2018 AMWAY INDIA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ...Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sohan Singh Rana, Mrs. Bindra Rana, Ms. Priya Adlakha, Ms. Tulip De & Mr. Ashish Sharma, Ms. Ruhee Advocates. (M:9818202368) Passi, versus ADINATH ENTERPRISES & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Siddharth Batra, Ms. Garima CS (OS) 410/2018, 453/2018, 480/2018, 531/2018, 550/2018,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.906 OF2016VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA ...PETITIONER (S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA ...RESPONDENT (S) WITH T.P.(C) No.1958-1967/2016, W.P.(C) No.1011/2016, SLP(C) No.36757/2016, W.P.(C) No.40/2017, W.P.(C) No.47/2017, W.P.(C) No.41/2017, W.P.(C) No.260/2017, T.P.(C) No.607/2017, T.P.(C) No.588/2017, T.P.(C) No.626/2017, T.P.(C) No.585/2017, T.P.(C) No.582/2017, T.P.(C) No.638/2017, W.P.(C) No.568/2018, W.P.(C) No.1018/2019, W.P.(C) No.683/2020, T.C.(C) No.9/2017, W.P.(C) No.908/2016, W.P.(C) No.913/2016, W.P.(C) No.916/2016, W.P.(C) No.1026/2016, W.P.(C) No.943/2016, W.P.(Crl.) No.162/2016, W.P.(C) No.951/2016, W.P.(C) No.929/2016, W.P.(C) No.930/2016, W.P.(C) No.944/2016, T.P.(C) No.1982-1996/2016, W.P.(C) No.952/2016, W.P.(C) No.953/2016, W.P.(C) No.958/2016, W.P.(C) No.957/2016, SLP(C) No.35356/2016, T.P.(C) No.2030- 2038/2016, W.P.(C) No.978/2016, W.P.(C) No.1025/2016, SLP(C) No.3580...
Tag this Judgment!