Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: improvement boards act 1976 Sorted by: old Page 6 of about 107,414 results (0.155 seconds)

Mar 23 2016 (HC)

Prakash Chand P. Jain Vs. B.S. Veerabhadraiah

Court : Karnataka

..... karnataka housing board act 1962 (karnataka act no.10 of 1963), the improvements board constituted under the karnataka improvements boards act, 1976 (karnataka act 11 of 1976), department of mines and geology the forest department, karnataka industrial areas development board established under the karnataka industrial areas development board act, 1966 (karnataka act 18 of 1966), the karnataka small scale industries development corporation, the karnataka state industrial investment development corporation, karnataka state electronics development corporation, registered as a company under the companies act, 1956 (central act 1 of 1956), the ..... the karnataka housing board act, 1962 (karnataka act no.10 of 1963), the improvements board constituted under the karnataka improvements boards act, 1976 (karnataka act 11 of 1976), department of mines and geology, the forest department, karnataka industrial areas development board act, 1966 (karnataka act 18 of 1966), the karnataka small scale industries development corporation, the karnataka state industrial investment development corporation, karnataka state electronics development corporation, registered as a company under the companies act, 1956 (central act 1 of 1956), the karnataka agricultural produce market committee constituted under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2017 (HC)

R Lakshman @ Lakshmana Reddy Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... the meanwhile, the davanagere improvement board sought to acquire land to the extent of 28 acres and 14 guntas from the disputed land for the purpose of devraj urs layout and accordingly, acquisition proceedings were initiated under the provisions of the karnataka improvement boards act, 1976, and subsequently, inspite of the final notification issued by the board, the land acquisition officer ..... the schedule property continues to be an agricultural land and if the same is required to be used for any other purpose, order of conversion is required to be obtained as contemplated under section 95 of the act and if 12 permanent structures are put up by the respondent nos.4 to 7 without obtaining any permission from the deputy commissioner, the usage and construction thereon are illegal and unauthorized and the deputy commissioner is ..... counsel for the petitioner, reiterating the grounds urged in the writ petition, contended that under the provisions of section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act, 1964, the deputy commissioner is the authority to take action against respondent nos.4 to 7 who are putting up unauthorized construction in the schedule ..... is not the competent authority to take action against the respondents 4 to 7 to stop unauthorized construction of the private landed property of the petitioner under section 95 of the karnataka land revenue act and only competent civil court shall decide the right, title and interest in respect of the immovable property of the parties.17. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 26 2018 (HC)

Sri Srinath Mangalore Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... he further submitted that the complaint without there being any offence committed by the petitioners under the special act like karnataka slum areas (improvement & clearance) act, bangalore development authority act, the bangalore water supply and sewerage board act and other allied ten acts as notified, the bmtf police have absolutely no jurisdiction to register the case as against the accused-petitioners and therefore the same is liable ..... act, 1976 b) the bangalore development authority act, 1976 c) the karnataka municipalities act, 1964 d) the bangalore water supply and sewerage board act, 1964 e) the karnataka slum areas (improvement and clearance) act ..... act, 1976, the karnataka municipalities act, 1964 and karnataka slum areas (improvement and clearance) act ..... the karnataka municipal corporations and certain other laws (amendment) act, 1984 amended the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976, karnataka municipalities act, bangalore development authority act, karnataka slum clearance act prohibiting unauthorized occupation of lands belonging to the corporations, the bangalore development authority, the municipal council and the unauthorized occupations were made punishable with imprisonment for ..... is constituted under g.o.no.udd247mnu95dated 19.03.1996 headed by deputy inspector general of police at government level to enforce the provisions of the following acts to safeguard the properties of respective local bodies and boards: a) the karnataka municipal corporation act, 1976. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2021 (HC)

M/s Ssjv Projects Private Limited Vs. M/s Allahabad Bank

Court : Karnataka

..... act, 1956 the karnataka housing board constituted under the karnataka housing board act, 1962 (karnataka act 10 of 1963), the industrial areas development board constituted under the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act, 18 of 1966), the karnataka slum clearance board established under the karnataka slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1973, (karnataka act 33 of 1974) the bangalore development authority constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (karnataka act 12 of 1976 ..... ), a nagarabhivruddhi pradhikara constituted under the karnataka nagarabhivruddhi pradhikaragala adhiniyama, 1987 (karnataka act ..... or both; (vii) any corporation, not being a company as defined in section 3 of the companies act, 1956 (central act 1 of 1956) established or constituted by the state government or the central government or both; (viii) the coffee board constituted under the coffee act, 1942 (central act 7 of 1942), as security for any loan or other facility given by such society, bank, company, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2021 (HC)

Sri U M Ramesh Rao Vs. Union Bank Of India

Court : Karnataka

..... act, 1956 the karnataka housing board constituted under the karnataka housing board act, 1962 (karnataka act 10 of 1963), the industrial areas development board constituted under the karnataka industrial areas development act, 1966 (karnataka act, 18 of 1966), the karnataka slum clearance board established under the karnataka slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1973, (karnataka act 33 of 1974) the bangalore development authority constituted under the bangalore development authority act, 1976 (karnataka act 12 of 1976 ..... ), a nagarabhivruddhi pradhikara constituted under the karnataka nagarabhivruddhi pradhikaragala adhiniyama, 1987 (karnataka act ..... or both; (vii) any corporation, not being a company as defined in section 3 of the companies act, 1956 (central act 1 of 1956) established or constituted by the state government or the central government or both; (viii) the coffee board constituted under the coffee act, 1942 (central act 7 of 1942), as security for any loan or other facility given by such society, bank, company, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 2021 (HC)

Bagalkot Town Development Authority Vs. Mallikarjun C. Charnatimath

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... which are now well settled; we are inclined to grant a limited indulgence in the matter as under and for the following reasons: a) appellant is constituted as a statutory authority under the provisions of the karnataka improvements board act, 1976; it has statutory power to acquire and dispose of :6. ..... not notified to the learned single judge, either; this is a grave & culpable lapse on the part of the writ petitioner, if not the other side; this mla ought to have recused from the board meeting when it s agenda was the grant of land to his brother; the apex court has time & again observed that the participation of relatives in the decision making process taints the decision and renders ..... and learned government advocate do not dispute the entitlement of the writ petitioner to the allotment of an industrial site of reasonable size and passing of the subject resolutions; in fact, the appellant had passed a resolution in the board meeting dated 16.06.2007 for allotting a commercial site admeasuring 7 acres & 39 guntas in sy.nos.134/2a & 2b in his favour at the rate for which allotments were made in favour of anjuman and kalidasa educational institutions ..... : the allotment is not regulated by law can not be disputed; admittedly we have the 2004 rules promulgated under the 1976 act; the apex court in a catena of decisions has ruled that the property held by the state & its instrumentalities is always in public trust and therefore allotment of the same by sale, lease or otherwise has to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 2022 (SC)

The State Of Karnataka Vs. B.r Muralidhar

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... this act was enacted by the maharashtra state legislature to consolidate the bombay housing board act, 1948, in the bombay and hyderabad areas of the state, the madhya pradesh housing board act, 1950, the bombay building repairs and reconstruction board act, 1969 and the maharashtra slum improvement board act, 1973 ..... in that, show cause notice (preliminary notification) is ordinarily issued when the competent authority is satisfied that for the purpose of executing any work of improvement in relation to any slum area or any building in such area or for the purpose of re developing any slum clearance area , or for the purpose of rehabilitating slum dwellers, it is necessary to acquire any land and it has been so decided ..... further, in response to the argument canvassed across the bar by the learned counsel for the writ petitioners for the first time before this court in reference to the purport of section 17 of the 1973 act, it is urged by the state that the same ought not to be countenanced without there being any pleading in that regard 19 supra at footnote no.12 20 (2013) 7 scc522(7 judge bench) 15 before the high ..... this court upheld the validity of the 1976 act also in 17 (1986) 2 scc516(2 judge bench) 18 for short, the 1976 act 14 reference to article 31c of the constitution as it existed at the relevant time (validated by the decision in his holiness kesavananda bharati sripadagalvaru19), as can be discerned from the discussion in paragraphs 13 to 15 of the reported .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2023 (HC)

Joseph Raj Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... allotment of site is done not in a private negotiation but in accordance with the extant allotment rules promulgated under the erstwhile city of bangalore improvement act, 1945 which has since been repealed by the bangalore development authority act, 1976, making the bda a legal successor of city improvement trust board. ..... (ii) the above being the position, the decree of the court has to be recognized and acted upon by the statutory authorities like the bda, regardless of its being a party thereto or not, consistent with the doctrine of feeding the grant by estoppel enacted in section 43 of the transfer of property act, 1882 especially when no amount was due from the side of allottee towards the sital value - 5 - wp no.8204 of 2019 nor any formal compliance was expected of him ..... parliament) with the power to decide the manner in which records, acts and judicial proceedings are to be proved, on the advice of james madison jr ..... the congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof. ..... (1) full faith and credit shall be given throughout the territory of india to public acts, records and judicial proceedings of the union and of every state. ..... , section 118 of the constitution of australia employs a full faith and credit clause, which has the following text: full faith and credit shall be given, throughout the commonwealth, to the laws, the public acts and records, and the judicial proceedings of every state. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2002 (SC)

Munithimmaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1574; JT2002(3)SC254; 2002(3)SCALE194; (2002)4SCC326; [2002]2SCR825; (2002)2UPLBEC1558

..... 31.1.1980 the government of karnataka published a notification under section 19(1) of the bangalore development authority act, 1976 [hereinafter referred to as `the act'] making known about the sanction of an improvement scheme for the formation of layout called 'west of chord road, iv stage', and the publication of preliminary notification on 25.7.1974 and the declaration then made under section 19 of the act that the lands specified in the said notification, noticed supra, are needed for a public purpose ..... certain conditions, which, among other things, included compliance with the formalities prescribed by and obligations to the city improvement trust board or need to secure the approval for the layout and building plans from the said board and obtaining of necessary licences, etc. ..... above decisions, this court, after adverting to an earlier decision reported in the land acquisition officer, city improvement trust board, bangalore vs h. ..... for the appellant on the decisions reported in the special land acquisition officer, city improvement trust board, mysore vs p. ..... filed objections, among other things, stating that already a proposal dated 12.8.1974 for formation of a private layout under section 25 of the city improvement trust board act was submitted by him and the same was pending with the cit board. ..... of the bangalore development authority also informed on 19.8.1982 that the land comprised in survey no.81/6, noticed above, was not really required by the cit board for its schemes. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2003 (HC)

Chandramma and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2002KAR5182; 2003(2)KarLJ490

..... it is also seen that earlier to 1976, the city improvement trust board act was in existence, and in the year 1976 the bda act came into force. ..... doddamani, submitted that the government had already sanctioned the scheme prepared by the bda for forming gnanabharathi layout on 29-6-1988 itself and thereafter a specific sanction has been granted under section 18(3) of the act on 3-10-1996 and the bda has considered the objections filed by the petitioners and since there was no modification of the scheme already sanctioned by the government, final notification has been passed by the government in ..... this court, by common order dated 7-10-1996 held that objections have not been properly considered by the bda and that final notifications passed on different dates in respect of the petitioners under section 19(1) of the act insofar as they relate to the petitioners' lands, were liable to be quashed and accordingly notifications insofar as they relate to the petitioners' lands were quashed, leaving liberty to the bda to issue fresh notification if they are so ..... of the case are whether fresh sanction was necessary and whether the authorities have considered the objections independently and whether the entire proceedings are liable to be quashed as the provisions of the bda act, 1976 are unconstitutional in the absence of assent by the president as required under article 31(3) of the constitution of india.12. ..... land acquisition officer, city improvement trust board, bangalore v. h. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //