Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: improvement boards act 1976 Court: chennai Page 7 of about 6,728 results (0.081 seconds)

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... it says that where the registrar is satisfied that for the purpose of altering the area of operation of a registered society or for the purpose of improving the services rendered by it or for any other purpose specified in the rules, an amendment to the byelaws is necessary, after consulting the board of the financing bank in the manner prescribed, to which the society is affiliated, call upon the society to show cause why the amendment should not be made. ..... view of the high court that the right to form a society is only a statutory right would no longer hold waters, in view of article 19(1)(c) as it stands today, yet, the view of the high court on the regulatory nature of the act that on being members, they cease to have any individual interest other than that of the societies' interest, merits acceptance in the context of the protection available in section 14-a of the andhra pradesh co-operative societies ..... m.l.nagaraj) as follows: " when an identical question came up before this court for consideration in k.shantharaj case this court held that from the language of section 30 [which is similar to section 32(4) of the act] and section 30-a of the karnataka cooperative societies act, 1959, it would be clear that the administrator, subject to control of registrar exercise all or any of the functions of the society, and the special officer, subject to control of the state government and the registrar exercise and .....

T.K. Shanmugam Secretary C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee V ...

Court : Chennai

..... , the government had categorised 19 tanks as tanks that do not have any problem in taking the rehabilitation and restoration work and tanks that are relatively large and essentially required to be restored for improving and sustaining the sub-soil water levels and ensuring pollution free environments. 7. ..... by the hon'ble apex court, vide order dated 30.10.2015, has held that even the tanks which do not fall within the purview of the tamil nadu protection of tanks and eviction of encroachment act, 2007, also require protection from encroachment and any encroachment made in such tanks or water bodies have to be removed by following the provisions of the ..... the government directed the collector to evict the encroachments in the kolathur tank and demarcate and hand over the land to the tamil nadu housing board except the portion of the tank to be retained as tank for storage of water for recharging ground water in that area. 15. ..... 51-a(g) of our constitution contains a constitutional mandate to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life. ..... dated 04.8.1988, the government has requested the tamil nadu housing board to draw up suitable plans in consultation with mmda and metrowater to provide sufficient storage capacity in a portion of the kolathur tank to store adequate water which will act as an acquifier for recharging ground water in the area. ..... with a view to avoid floods and improving facility in the city, the government issued g.o. (ms) .....

The General Manager, Union of India, Chennai and Others Vs. The Regist ...

Court : Chennai

..... water. the said letter is extracted hereunder: "the above named employee who was placed on sick list at rh/goc from 31.03.2011 has been examined by medical board held at rh/goc on 22.09.2011 and found him unift for aye three category, fit in cey one and below not involving jobs with heavy machinery, heights, ..... per column no.8 of the railway board's letter, in respect of duties and responsibilities and training of those absorbed in the new category, the staff so absorbed/promoted against the newly created posts would be under obligation to shoulder existing duties of the supervisors (permanent way), as well as the additional/new duties as entrusted to them by the railway administration, keeping in view the changing needs/methods of track maintenance/technological improvements/ mechanized track maintenance and ..... they have also submitted that in terms of the provisions contained in the persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995, the substantive pay and the grade pay of the substantive post of gangmate held by the 2nd respondent was not reduced and therefore, his status as a regular gangmate ..... was appointed as gangman, in the scale of pay of rs.196-232, under section engineer, permanent way, tiruthuraipoondi, with effect from 07.01. ..... petition are that the 2nd respondent, mr.m.rajendran, was appointed as gangman, in scale of pay of rs.196-232, under section engineer, permanent way, tiruthuraipoondi, with effect from 07.01.1976. .....

Ms. A. Arulmozhi Vs. the Govt. of India and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2005)3MLJ497

..... around the following questions :(1) whether the film 'new', which is in question, is produced in accordance with the guidelines issued under section 5b of the cinematograph act, 1952 ;(2) whether the censor certificate, issued by the second respondent/central board of film certification, is in consonance with the provisions of the act and(3) whether this court could issue mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to revoke the censor certificate, issued to this film for public exhibition ?14. ..... on going through the entire records, we are amazed to notice the details of several shocking events, which could be given in brief as under, in chronological order :(i) the regional officer, central board of film certification, chennai, received various complaints from several women associations, requesting to take action against the tamil films, since the words used in lyrics are quite bad in taste and commonly misused ..... the censor board should step in firmly and insist that the film being released has a message meant to improve the values of life and should see that the film contains only such scenes which do not affect the values ..... (6) the censor board has failed to follow the principle that it should step in firmly and insist that the film being released as a message is meant to improve the values of life and should see that the law against obscenity protects the society, particularly the young, from harmful consequences of the anti-social and commercial activities of the peddlers of .....

K.V. Nagarajan Vs. the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer,

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2007(208)ELT165(Mad); 2007[5]STR325

..... case, it is not in dispute that the agreement expressly provides for manufacturing of rcc poles out of the raw materials agreed to be supplied by the board and any excess material, including gunny bags, after the completion of the work should be returned to the board; that the income tax payable on the contract amount bill would be deducted from and out of the payment to be made to the petitioner in accordance ..... from and out of the payment to be made to the petitioner in accordance with the provisions of the income tax act, 1961 as tax deducted at sources (tds); the payment of the sales tax, if any made applicable by the government of tamil nadu for the pole manufacturing works shall be borne by the board and the contractor is entitled to make claim if any on production of the notice issued by the government of tamil ..... whereas, section 2(u) of the tngst act, is an inclusive definition, which defines 'works contract' as any agreement for carrying out the building, construction, manufacture, processing, fabrication, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair or commissioning, of any movable or immovable property, for ..... out for cash, deferred payment or other valuable consideration, the building, construction, manufacture, processing, fabrication, erection, installation, fitting out, improvement, modification, repair or commissioning, of any movable or immovable property.8. ..... if he does not improve in spite of written warnings his contract will be terminated .....

R. Indu Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Rep. by Its R ...

Court : Chennai

..... respondent - university the letter dated 25.10.2012 received from the medical council of india does not contemplates any amendment to any of the regulations of the mci, which is to be notified under section 33 of the indian medical council act, but it only conveys the consent of the mci for the proposed enhancement in the minimum standards by the 1st respondent university, and therefore, the consent of the central government in the matter is absolutely not necessary. 20. ..... the 1st respondent - university in its counter affidavit categorically stated that the standing academic board is the highest academic body of the 1st respondent - university, and it is conferred with the following powers under section 29(3) of the tamil nadu dr.m.g.r.medical university act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the act):- (i) to make regulations and amend or repeal the same (ii) to advise the governing council on the promotion of research of the university; and (iii) to suggest measures for revisions ..... . the respondent-university would state that they have adopted this method with a view to improve the standard of medical education, has resolved to fix 50% mark to be secured in each component. ..... the governing council felt that the steps taken by the university in improving the academic standards are in the long term interest of the student community and health system ..... it has got every right to bring in regulations over and above the minimum stipulated by the mci to improve the academic standards. .....

Ammini Karnan Vs. Intellectual Property Appellate Board

Court : Chennai

..... negi, vice chairman and hon'ble s.usha, technical member, in the matter of original appeal no.21 of 2005, who were duly appointed as judicial member an technical member under the act as per the qualifications specified and following the convention in various enactments for eligibility criteria and even the technical member was having not less than ten years in the advocate profession with ..... far as the bills are concerned, the word "nirapara" is written separately in all the bills with the same handwriting and therefore, they are not genuine; (d) as regards sec.11(a) of the act (old), the opponent did not dispute the use of the trademark by the applicant since 1990; (e) as far as the question of deception and confusion is concerned, both the parties are using ..... commenced only in 1991, whereas they have claimed using of the trademark from march 1990; (d) that the appellate board has not considered sec.129 of the act, whereby the evidence before the registrar shall be by way of affidavit, in lieu of formal examination of witnesses; (e) that the appellate board was consisting of the vice-chairman, who was not a judicial member and a technical member. ..... in fact, as stated supra, there is an attempt on the part of the writ petition to improve her case of prior use relying on with subsequent events and documents and even in the writ petition there is a plea that the 3rd respondent is not ..... which claimed a prior use only from 1990, she goes on improving the case for such prior use. ..... improved .....

Muthureddy Thottam Residence Vs. Saravana Foundation Ltd

Court : Chennai

..... nadu slum clearance board and therefore, it was held that the plaintiffs in that suit were not occupiers attracting the definition of 'occupier' and they were not entitled to the protection of the tamil nadu slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1971.11. ..... not the case of the revision petitioner that after having obtained permission from the corporation or from the tamil nadu slum clearance board, they have occupied the suit property and as a matter of fact, it is held in the judgment rendered in c.s.no.911 of 1984 that the plaintiff in that suit failed to prove that their occupation of the suit property was as per the provisions of tamil nadu slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1971. ..... in the reported case, the petitioners before the supreme court were the owners of the land which were acquired under the land acquisition act and they challenged the validity of the notification under section 4(1) and the exercise of the power given under section 17(b) read with ..... were found evicted on 24.3.1984 by due process of law and the learned single judge also held that they are not occupiers of the suit as per the provisions of tamil nadu slum areas (improvement and clearance) act, 1971. ..... section 56 of the said act, the authorised authority shall, on the application of the owner or occupier of any premises or the owner of a private street, arrange for the applicant's house-sewer or other sewer in the private street to empty into a sewer of the board subject to certain conditions. .....

G. Sivanandam Vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

..... the highly competent counsel mr.a.nagarajan appearing for the fourth respondent submits that the tamil nadu housing board had handed over a portion of acquired lands to the fourth respondent by way of gift deed dated 08.11.2010 to an extent of 47 grounds and 604 sq.ft. ..... the fourth respondent further submits that the gifted land is being improved as a park in a short period for the use of public. ..... the hon'ble supreme court, on finding that no declaration could be issued as on the date of the order as the period stipulated under section 6 of the act having elapsed, allowed the special leave petition and quashed the acquisition in respect of that petitioner alone. ..... the corporation has also spent a sum of rs.3,04,684/- for the improvement of this land for the use of public. ..... the fourth respondent further submits that the land gifted by tnhb at survey no.331/2pt, 332 pt, 334 pt, mogappair village are under the possession of corporation of chennai and protected with compound wall and it is being improved as a park for the use of public. ..... a few landowners preferred writ petitions challenging the acquisition and the hon'ble division bench of this court quashed the declaration under section 6(1) of the act on 08.01.1988 in respect of those writ petitioners inter-alia holding that rule 3(b) of the tamil nadu land acquisition rules having not been complied with and the second provision of section 6(1) of the act having not been complied while issuing the declaration under section 6 of the .....

T.K. Shanmugam Secretary, C.P.I. (M) North Chennai District Committee, ...

Court : Chennai

..... lay out or building plan, if the land is located either in part or in whole, in a water body and directing the government to contemplate issuing of an order under the tamil nadu town and country planning act making it mandatory to enclose a certificate of the revenue authority along with building plan application, certifying that no part of the land is located in a water body and wrong information if provided, the person who issued ..... a show cause notice and a brief hearing, long duration of such illegal occupation or huge expenditure in making construction thereon or political connection must not be treated as a justification for condoning the illegal act or for regularising their illegal possession and regularisation should only be permitted in exceptional cases namely, where lease has been granted under some government notification to landless/labourers or members of the schedule caste/schedule ..... of the constitution of india enjoins that it shall be the duty of every citizen of india, inter alia, to protect and improve the national environment including forests, lakes, rivers, wildlife and to have compassion for living creatures. ..... the interest of every citizen to make sure that he is not encroaching on a tank and to clear tanks and water bodies which are filled with garbage and to avoid dumping of garbage will automatically enhance and improve the public health of the community. ..... with the provisions of the land encroachment act, tank act and standing orders of board of revenue. .....