Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: immoral traffic prevention act 1956 section 13 special police officer and advisory body Court: delhi Page 1 of about 107 results (0.272 seconds)

Shalu Rawal and ors. Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)552; 104(2003)DLT550; 2003(68)DRJ463; 2003(2)JCC1016

..... learned acmm in his order observed that from the material placed on record commission of offences under sections 3,4,5 of immoral traffic (prevention) act 1956 against accused sandeep suri and accused shalu and under section 8 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act 1956 are prima facie made out against other accused persons,namely, rajni madan, ritu tomer, sapna, rajani sandhu, vimal and sheetal. ..... of the parlour, shalu who produced six girls for prostitution had committed offences under sections 3,4, 5 & 7 immoral traffic (prevention) act. ..... that the law is well-settled that the acmm can ignore the cancellation report or the conclusion arrived at by the investigating officer and independently apply his mind to take cognizance in exercise of his power under section 190(1)(b) cr.p.c. ..... rajouri garden brought this information to the notice of additional commissioner of police (in short `acp') rajouri garden who in turn ordered to organise a ..... special judicial magistrate : 1998crilj1 in which it is mentioned that summoning an accused is a serious matter and order must reflect application of mind to the nature of allegations and the evidence on record ..... 1, 4 and 7 were menstruating on the date of the alleged incident and this fact itself was sufficient for the learned acmm to be convinced that at that stage of their body they could not have been offered for sex. 14. ..... , thereafter, informed him that the body massage would cost rs. ..... ajay kumar replied that he had come there for body massage. .....

Kamaljeet Singh (In Judicial Custody) Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 148(2008)DLT170; 2008(101)DRJ582

..... by this appeal filed under section 12 of the maharashtra control of organized crimes act, 1999 (for short the mcoca), the appellant seeks to assail the order on charge dated 12th october, 2006 and the charge dated 3-11-2006 whereby the learned special judge, mcoca, new delhi has charged the appellant under sections 4 and 5 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (for short the itp act), sections 3(1)(ii), 3(4), 3(5) and section 4 of the mcoca and section 420 read with section 120b of the ipc in fir no. ..... code or in the indian evidence act, 1872 (1 of 1872), but subject to the provisions of this section, a confession made by a person before a police officer not below the rank of the superintendent of police and recorded by such police officer either in writing or on any mechanical devices like cassettes, tapes or sound tracks from which sounds or images can be reproduced, shall be admissible in the trial of such person or co-accused, abettor or conspirator:provided that, the co-accused, abettor or conspirator is charged and tried in the same case together ..... that the girls were abused or sexually exploited so as to force them to offer their body for promiscuous sexual intercourse, the offences under sections 4, 5 and 8 of the itp act, 1956 as amended till date are not made out against the appellant. 24. mr. .....

Sangeeta and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3923; 58(1995)DLT589

..... all of them were produced before the learned metropolitan magistrate who after conducting an enquiry u/section 17 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 hereinafter referred to as the act for the sake of convenience) ordered the detention of the petitioners i.e. ..... (31) section 15(6a) envisages 'the special police officer or the trafficking police officer, as the case may be, making a search under this section shall be accompanied by at least two women police officers, and where any women or girl removed under sub-section (4) is required to be interrogated, it shall be done by a woman police officer and if no woman police officer is available, the interrogation shall be done only in the presence of a lady member of a recognised welfare institution or organisation. ..... other custody as he shall, for reasons to be recorded in writing, considersuitable:provided that such custody shall not be that of a person or body of persons ofa religious persuasion different from that of the person and that those entrusted with the custody of the person including the persons in charge of a protective home, may be required to enter into a bond which may, where necessary and feasible, contain undertakings based on directions relating tothe proper care, guardianship, education, training .....

Mumtaj @ Behri Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2003CriLJ533; 100(2002)DLT286

..... appeal is directed against the impugned order of conviction dated 10th january, 2002 and order on sentence dated 1st february, 2002 passed by learned asj whereby the appellant was convicted under section 3 and 4 of immoral traffic (prevention) act (for short 'the act') and was sentenced to undergo ri for two years and a fine of rs. ..... further section 15 of the act requires that search and arrest can be carried out only by, the special police officer or some officer subordinate to him and authorised by him in ..... 386 wherein prosecution under section 3, 4 and 5 of the act was quashed by invoking section 482 cr.pc as the investigation was not conducted by special police officer.5. mr. v.k. ..... was further held that only the special police officer appointed under the act is competent to investigate offences under the act and the police officers not specially appointed as special police officers cannot investigate offences under the act even though they are cognizable offences. ..... conducted search, investigations and arrested the accused persons, did not have the power of special police officer and thereforee all proceedings conducted by him are illegal and unauthorised. ..... ble supreme court further observed that if powers of the special police officer to deal with the offences under the act and thereforee to investigate into the offences, be not held exclusive, there can be two investigations carried on by two different agencies, one by special police officer and the other by the ordinary police. .....

Naseem Bano @ Naseem Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... has been preferred by the appellant convicted by the trial court under section 3, 4 & 5 of immoral traffic prevention act (itpa) in fir no. ..... two years and fine under section 4 and ri for 5 years and fine under section 5 of itp act. ..... trial court rightly convicted her under section 4 of itp act and sentenced her accordingly.5. ..... is no illegality in the order of trial court convicting the appellant under section 3 of itp act and awarding punishment as awarded.3. ..... the third conviction of the appellant for offence under section 3 of itp act in respect of some kotha the minimum punishment for second conviction or subsequent conviction provided under law was two years and maximum five years. ..... this case categorically testified that whatever payment was made by the customers for her prostitution, it was shared by appellant naseem and other accused suman (po) and whatever baksheesh was given by the customers that also used to be taken by suman. ..... all these witnesses it is apparent that the appellant was causing carrying on of prostitution by pw-1 to pw-4 at her kotha and was guilty of offence under section 5 of itp act. ..... section 3 of itp act was made out against accused in view of the fact that the accused was keeping and ..... shows that she initially carried on prostitution at kotha of luxmi situated in the same building and she was later taken for prostitution by the appellant at her kotha. ..... this evidence there was evidence of pw-1 chandni who testified about raid conducted by the police at kotha no. .....

Nitu and Others Vs. The Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi a ...

Court : Delhi

..... this writ petition is filed praying inter alia to declare section 18 of immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (for short the act') as void, unconstitutional and ultra vires and further to quash the four orders of the sub-divisional magistrate (sdm), paharganj, delhi dated 21.07.2012 passed under section 18 of the act in respect of four premises, viz. ..... from 26.01.1987 and now it stands as the the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 ?. ..... the constitutional validity of section 18 of the suppression of immoral traffic in women and girls act, 1956 (as the act was then referred to), was challenged before the high court of punjab and haryana in the year 1962 in ram kali v. a.c. ..... before sita, legislations relating to prostitution existed in several states including bombay prevention of prostitution act, 1923 and bengal suppression of immoral traffic act, 1933. ..... it may be recalled that before amendment by act 46 of 1978, the powers under both sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 18 were exercisable by a district magistrate, a sub-divisional magistrate, a presidency magistrate or a magistrate of first class specially empowered by the state government by notification in the official gazette to exercise jurisdiction under the act who are also competent to try the offences under sections 3 and 7. ..... office of commissioner of police and ors. .....

Rekha Vs. State

Court : Delhi

..... rekha and sheetal challenge the impugned judgment dated april 25, 2014 convicting them for offences punishable under sections 373/34, 366a/34, 342/34 ipc and sections 3/4/5/6 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (in short itp act ) and the order on sentence dated may 01, 2014 by which they have been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of ..... state of madras [air 1952 sc 149 : 1952 scr 425 : 1952 cri lj 832] this court examined the contention that the publication of an article attributing corruption to a judicial officer was not cognizable in contempt jurisdiction by virtue of section 2(3) of the contempts of courts act, 1953, which provided that: no high court shall take cognizance of a contempt alleged to have been committed in respect of a court subordinate to it where such contempt is an offence punishable under the indian penal code. ..... stated that a police officer called out her name and she came out, though no person from outside gathered at kotha no.70 when the police came to rescue. ..... contention that the provisions of ipc are ancillary to the provisions of itp act ignores the settled principle that same set of facts may constitute offences both under the ipc and a special enactment. ..... s refused to do prostitution, sheetal along with another lady, who was present at the kotha, namely rekha threatened her stating that she could not go anywhere now, she will have to live at the kotha and sell her body for earning money. .....

Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee Vs. Uoi and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... on a complaint made by b, fir no.98/2009 was registered by the police station kamla market on 29th july, 2009 under sections 366a, 368, 373, 323, 376, 109 read with section 34 of the indian penal code ( ipc hereafter) and sections 3, 4 and 5 of the crl rev.no.443/2009 & crl.m.a.no.3071/2010 2 immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 (hereafter referred to as the 'it act of 1956').3. ..... .-(1) when the special police officer removing a [person] ..... the role of the state as a facilitator rather than doer by involving voluntary organizations and local bodies in the implementation of the proposed legislation; (vii) to create special juvenile police units with a humane approach through sensitisation and training of police personnel; (viii) to enable increased accessibility to a juvenile or the child by establishing juvenile justice boards and child welfare committees and homes in each district or group of districts; (ix) to minimise the stigma and in keeping with the development needs of the juvenile or the child, to separate ..... not being the penis, into the vagina, the urethra or anus of the child or makes the child to do so with him or any other person; or (c) he manipulates any part of the body of the child so as to cause penetration into the vagina, urethra, anus or any part of body of the child or makes the child to do so with him or any other person; or (d) he applies his mouth to the penis, vagina, anus, urethra of the child or makes the child to do so to such person or .....

Pankaj @ Deepak Biswas vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi

Court : Delhi

..... taking into consideration that the appellant had been convicted at one trial for the offences under section 376/109/368 ipc and sections 4/of immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 for which separate sentences have been awarded, it is directed that all the sentences awarded to the appellant shall run concurrently.6. 7.8 ..... impugned judgment dated 13th february, 2013, the appellant was held guilty for committing the offence punishable under section 376 ipc,ipc, 368 ipc and under sections 4, 5 & 6 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956. ..... 6 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 with a fine of 50,000 ..... 5 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 with a fine of 2,000 ..... 4 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 with a fine of 1,000 ..... the fact that the convict has two minor children, who are at present lodged at nirmal chhaya and have nobody to look after them, does not persuade me to impose a lighter sentence upon the ..... of customs (prevention) ahmedabad and anr. ..... a direction for concurrent running of sentences ought to be issued in a given case would depend upon the nature of the offence or offences committed and the facts and circumstances of issue directions their discretion to crl.a. ..... decisions are not cases arising out of conviction at one trial of two or more offences and therefore, reference to section 31 cr.p.c. ..... , the convict cannot now be heard to say that he should be dealt with leniency for the reason that there is body to look after his two minor children.10. .....

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Birendra Kumar Singh@virendra Kuma ...

Court : Delhi

..... turning to the factual matrix of the case, the respondent along with other accused was charged for offences under section 120b r/w section 342/343/344/366a/376/420 and 506 ipc r/w section 4 & 5 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 and substantive offences u/s 343/366a/376 of ipc and section 4&5 of immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956. ..... (x) on completion of investigation, a charge sheet under section 120 b read with sections 343, 344, 366a, 376, 420, 506 of ipc and section 4 and 5 of the immoral traffic (prevention) act, 1956 was filed by the petitioner on 22.05.2012. ..... punishment prescribed under section 5 of immoral traffic (prevention) act is for term of seven years which may extend to imprisonment for term of 14 years. ..... " the general rule that this court will not ordinarily interfere in matters relating to bail, is subject to exceptions where there are special circumstances and when the basic requirements for grant of bail are completely ignored by the high court. ..... stated that she visited the house of ajay and pandit with cbi officials; (xiii) she has denied the suggestion that she did not make any allegation against pandit in her statement on 02.03.2013 or that she did not stay with him at munirka, or that virender@birender, who was present in the court is not pandit or that she has falsely implicated the accused at the instance of the investigating officer of the case.4. ..... (iv) victim child was brought to cbi office where she was examined. .....