Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: immigrants expulsion from assam act 1950 Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 34 results (0.038 seconds)

Sep 06 2005 (HC)

Smt. Shyam Dulari Devi W/O Shri Ram Jeet Prasad Vs. State of U.P. Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2005All388; 2006(1)AWC378

..... clause any such person as is referred to therein whomsoever(i) thereatens any candidate, or any elector or any person in whom candidate or any elector is interested with injury of any kind including social ostracism and excommunication or expulsion from any caste or community; or(ii) induces or attempts to induce a candidate or an elector to believe that he or any person whom he is interested will become or will be rendered an object of divine displeasure or spiritual ..... then adding by clarifying what follows therefrom in view of the analysis made by us hereinabove:(1)if an election, (the term election being widely interpreted so as to include all steps and entire proceedings commencing from the date of notification of election till the date of declaration of result) is to be called in question and which questioning may have have the effect of interrupting obstructing or protracting the election proceedings ..... entry in the electoral roll should be corrected or deleted or that the name of any person entitled to be registered should be added in the electoral roll, he shall subject to the provisions of this act and rules and orders made thereunder and such general or special directions, if any, as may be given in this behalf by the nirvachan nideshak (panchayat), correct, delete or add the entry as the ..... now section 18 of the representation of the people act, 1950 which deals with apart from other matters the preparation of electoral rolls, lays down that no person shall be entitled to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1997 (HC)

Raj Bahadur Yadav Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1998CriLJ103

..... state of west bengal air 1970 sc 97 another 5 judge bench of the supreme court, construing the provisions of article 22(4) and (5) of the constitution and section 7 of the preventive detention act, 1950, held that it is clear from clauses (4) and (5) of article 22 that there is a dual obligation on the appropriate government and a dual right in favour of the detenu, namely, (1) to have his representation, irrespective of the length of detention, considered by the appropriate government and (2) to ..... the present case, there was no denial of the right of making a representation to the central government for revocation of the order of detention under section 11 of the conservation of foreign exchange and prevention of smuggling activities act, 1974 (cofeposa act for short), there is nothing but unexplained delay on the part of the state government and that by itself is not sufficient to invalidate the order of detention : the detenu was not deprived of the right of making ..... central government or the state government may,-(a) if satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india, the relations of india with foreign powers, or the security of india; or(b) if satisfied with respect to any foreigner that with a view to regulating his continued presence in india or with a view to making arrangements for his expulsion from india, it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1999 (HC)

Chandresh Paswan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999CriLJ2759

..... government or the state government may,--(a) if satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any ' manner prejudicial to the defence of india, the relations of india with foreign powers, of the security of india, or(b) if satisfied with respect to any foreigner that with a view to regulating his continued presence in india or with a view to making arrangements for his expulsion from india, it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained. ..... or the state government may,--(a) if satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india, the relations of india with foreign powers, of the security of india, or(b) if satisfied with respect to any foreigner that with a view to regulating his continued presence in india or with a view to making arrangements for his expulsion from india, it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained. ..... the central government or the state government may, if satisfied with respect to any person that with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 1951 (HC)

Deodat Rai and ors. Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1951All718

..... it was argued that the act imposes unreasonable restrictions inasmuch as it allows expulsion from the home town or home district, makes the order of expulsion irrevocable & fixes no limits to the amount of bond though it fixes amounts of the interim bond taken under section ..... act was amended by act 31 of 1950, which received assent of the governor-general on 13-11-1950 & was published in the gazette on 13-11-1950. ..... ' any act that infringed this fundamental right would become void from 26-1-1950; this is provided for in article ..... the union of india : [1950]1scr869 , the supreme court held that the sholapur spinning & weaving company (emergency provisions) act was a valid act even though it dealt with only sholapur spinning & ..... jurors were of the opinion that action should be taken against the applicants under the act, & accordingly on 9-6-1950 the learned ses. j. ..... on 14-4-1950 a notice under sections 3 (1) (a) (i) & (c) was served upon the applicant calling upon him to show cause to a subdivisional magistrate why he should not be bound down to be of good behaviour & keep the peace for one year & should not be externed from the district of jolaun or be ordered to report his presence & movements to the station officer of ..... 3-3-1950 the station officer of the police station arrested the applicants & then released them after taking security from them ..... jurors were of the opinion that action under section 3 should be taken against the applicant, & accordingly on 15-4-1950 the learned ses. j. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 1973 (HC)

Hakim Singh Vs. Shiv Sagar and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1973All596

..... give effect to the recommendation of the law commissioners that the high court shall have all the appellate jurisdiction which is now exercised by the sudder dewani adawlut, and a new appellate jurisdiction in civil cases, from the courts of original jurisdiction constituted by one or more of its own judges except that in the case of a decision which has been passed by a majority of the full number of the judges of ..... judge of the high court in exercise of jurisdiction and powers conferred by or under a particular statute, the legislature which enacted it or which is competent and empowered under the constitution to amend, alter or repeal the act in question, is the appropriate legislature under article 225 and can validly pass a law restricting, curtailing or even abolishing the right to file a further appeal to the high court under clause 10 of the letters patent. ..... usefully refer to the provisions of the bengal, agra and assam civil courts act (xii of 1887), the code of civil procedure (v of 1908) and the provincial small cause courts act (ix of 1887).but these acts do not lay down or specify what laws are to be administered by any of such courts, except that by section 37 (1) of act xii of 1887 it is provided that questions regarding succession inheritance ..... of appeal has been preserved and continued under the provisions of the constitution of india, 1950, in other high courts, as far as i am aware, such appeals still are known ..... social club for immigrants); formally establish (--a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1956 (HC)

Ghanshyam Das Gupta and ors. Vs. Board of High School and Intermediate ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All539

..... the above-mentioned charge against him, that is, he had been guilty of infamous conduct in a professional respect and would decide whether or not they should direct his name to be removed from the medical register pursuant to section 29 of the medical act, 1858.spackman attended the meeting of the council and desired that he be allowed to call certain evidence which was not before the divorce court with a view to challenge the correctness of ..... give notice to the appellants when it considered whether they had used unfair means at the examination and what penalty should be imposed, that the order cancelling the result of the appellants and debarring them from the examination of 1955 was within its powers and that the order cancelling the result of the examinations did not in any way offend against any fundamental rights, of the appellants under article 19(1)(f) ..... that when the examinations committee records a finding that the appellants were guilty of using unfair means at the examination and cancels the result of that examination on that ground and further debars them from appearing at the ensuing examination, the committee, does not merely take away a privilege granted to the appellants but affect their natural right to reputation with serious consequences to them in their career.110. ..... wherein the learned judges held that the giving of notice was absolutely necessary before action could be taken against a member for expulsion from a club. ..... advani : [1950]1scr621 and the case of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1953 (HC)

Raj NaraIn Singh Vs. Atmaram Govind and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All319

..... for article 194(3) of the constitution provides:'in other respects the powers, privileges and immunities of a house of the legislature of a state, and of the members and the committees, of a house of such legislature shall be such as may from time to time be defined by the legislature by law and until so defined, shall be those of the house of commons of the parliament of the united kingdom and of its members and committees at the commencement of this constitution'.it was ..... position of the speaker is, important and onerous as his duties and functions are, he is, in no sense, if i may say so with the utmost respect, the head of a state authorised under the constitution to take precautionary as distinguished from punitive action for possible disorders likely to occur in the conduct of the business of the house.in order to make this point clear, i may point out that, according to that great authority - sir william anson, -- the ..... case under the preventive detention act, 1950, that the principle of 'autre fois acquit' under section 403 of the code of criminal procedure has no application to a case under the preventive detention act and that the constitutional protection of article 20(2) of the constitution is also inapplicable because 'satisfaction under the preventive detention act is not a prosecution'. ..... of the speaker in having the applicant removed from the house for unruly behaviour was not a punishment and was not, strictly speaking, 'expulsion' within the meaning of rule 63 (4). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1972 (HC)

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Mool Chand Wahi

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1972All413

..... of liability and even if any of them did, the same was of no consequence as the letters were written by the assistant general manager, who was not the person authorised under section 19 of the limitation act and were insufficient to bind the statealso otherwise as they were not made and authenticated in accordance with the provisions of article 166 of the constitution. 4. ..... which the parties contested the claim in the court below was on the interpretation of section 19 of the limitation act and not on the ground that the letters do not fulfil the requirements of article 166 of the constitution. ..... effect from 1-11-1950 and a fresh increment certificate was issued raising the pay again with effect from ..... the letter written by the assistant general manager on 6-2-1958 which was exhibit 7 in the case was an acknowledgment within the meaning of section 19 of the limitation act and it saved the limitation for the entire claim. ..... the court below, therefore, that this letter amounted to an acknowledgment within the meaning of section 19 of the indian limitation act cannot be said to be erroneous. 7. ..... accept the contention about bar of limitation and held that the suit for the entire claim was within limitation as the limitation was saved by virtue of section 19 of the indian limitation act, 1908. ..... who was authorised to purchase and pay for all things required for the house of raja himself and his house-hold could make acknowledgment within the meaning of section 19 of the indian limitation act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2009 (HC)

Rajiv Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009CriLJ2619

..... central government or the state government may,- (a) if satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the defence of india, the relations of india with foreign powers, or the security of india, or (b) if satisfied with respect to any foreigner that with a view to regulating his continued presence in india or with a view to making arrangements for his expulsion from india, it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained. ..... sub-section (2) of section 3 provides that if the central government or the state government is satisfied with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the state or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order or from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies and services essential to the community, it is necessary so to do, then such government may make an order directing that such person ..... bengal : (1969) 2 scr 635 : air 1970 sc 852 and a caution, was there expressed that the expression 'public order' in section 3(1) of the preventive detention act, 1950 did not take in every infraction of law and that every disturbance of law and order leading to disorder would not be sufficient to invoke the extraordinary power under such a detention law, unless the act in question was such as endangered or was likely to endanger public order. ..... air 1950 fc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2010 (HC)

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... may--(i) remit the whole or any part of the sentence, with or without conditions;(ii) mitigate the punishment awarded;(iii) commute such punishment to any lesser punishment or punishments mentioned in the army act, 1950, (46 of 1950) the navy act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the air force act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be;(c) enhance the sentence awarded by a court martial:provided that no such sentence shall be enhanced unless the appellant has been given an opportunity of being heard;(d) release the ..... ; section 3(b) deals with 'application' and means that an application made under sub-section (2) of section 14; section 3(c) defines the 'appointed day' means the date with effect from which the tribunal is established by notification under section 4 of the act.chapter ii of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007 deals with establishment of tribunal and benches hereof and clearly provides that central government shall, by notification, establish the armed forces tribunal to exercise the jurisdiction ..... limitation : the tribunal shall not admit an application--(a) in a case where a final order such as is mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 21 has been made unless the application is made within six months from the date on which such final order has been made;(b) in a case where a petition or a representation such as is mentioned in clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 21 has been made and the period of six months has expired thereafter .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //