Illegalize - Judgment Search Results

Whether the Judgment and Decree Dated 18.03.1992 Passed in Civil Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... passed in civil suit titled as bhuru ram versus sajjna devi are illegal null and void and not binding on the interest of the ..... to be committed cannot be said to be suffering from any illegality both the courts have concurrently returned a finding that there is ..... it is held that such consent decree cannot be said to be illegal and void consequently the present regular second appeal is dismissed as .....

“(i) Whether the Order Dated 18.06.1988 Is Illegal and Void? Opp Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... trial court framed the following issues i whether the order dated 18 06 1988 is illegal and void opp ii whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration as prayed for opp ..... document chandigarh rs no 538 of 1997 5 consequently i do not find any patent illegality or irregularity in the judgment and decree passed by the courts below which may give .....

Corporation of Calcutta Vs. SirajuddIn and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1957Cal399,1957CriLJ722,61CWN1009

..... be instituted in respect of any work that is done illegally or continued illegally more than five years before the institution of such ..... after the words the work is done the words illegally or continued illegally 92 i would therefore give the following answers to ..... limitation would be different according as the construction concerned was illegal at the beginning or it was a construction which would .....

Sri. Guruprasad Vs. Government Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Sri Tokappa Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Smt M Mamatha Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Mr D B Krishnegowda Vs. Tahsildhar

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Sri C Govardhan Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Sri Basavarajappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....

Sri Rama Shetty Vs. The Chief Secretary

Court: Karnataka

..... as per annexure h as without competence and jurisdiction and otherwise being arbitrary illegal and void declare that the provisions of the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act2011is ..... offence it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession entering into and creating tenancies leases licences constructing unauthorised structures for .....