Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: homoeopathy central council act 1973 chapter i preliminary Court: supreme court of india Page 19 of about 271 results (0.176 seconds)

Apr 03 2002 (SC)

Ombalika Das and anr. Vs. Hulisa Shaw

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC1685; JT2002(3)SC476; 2002(3)SCALE265; (2002)4SCC539; [2002]2SCR902; 2002(3)SLJ17(SC)

..... and jointly residing), or a minor child or the widow,should have taken place while such member is in service or within fiveyears of retirement.8. recently in central bank of india v. ravindra and ors., : air2001sc3095 , a constitution bench of this court has observed that the use ofthe word 'such' as an adjective ..... therein.'. 3. the portion, which is placed between brackets '[]' in the text ofthe provision reproduced hereinabove, has been substituted by westbengal premises tenancy (amendment) act, 1979 (act xli of 1979) witheffect from 17th march, 1980 in place of the words which earlier read as:'or by a landlord who is a retired member of thenaval ..... not entitled to have recourse to special procedure fordisposal of application for eviction on the ground of bona fiderequirement prescribed by section 29b (chapter via of the act); theycould have had recourse to the forum of civil court. feeling aggrievedby the order of the high court, the landlords have filed this appeal byspecial leave. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1978 (SC)

Noor Mohd. Khan Ghouse Khan Soudagar Vs. Fakirappa Bharmappa Machenaha ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC1217; (1978)3SCC188; [1978]3SCR789

..... of the civil court h not to be lightly inferred. such exclusion must either be explicitly expressed or clearly implied. the law was laid down by the privy council in 67 indian appeals (page 222) and has been since affirmed by this court in several decisions. in dhulabhai v. state of m.p. : [1968] ..... court remanded the matter to the trial court for assessment of damages. after remand, by an amendment of the written statement kampanna claimed protection under the karnataka act. the mysore act ceased to be in force in march, 1966. the application for amendment of the written statement was made on the 2nd february, 1973. kampanna contended, ..... to possession. these questions are undoubtedly within the jurisdiction of the tribunal and as such excluded from the jurisdiction of the civil court. the karnataka land reforms act as well as the earlier enactements were made for the purpose of introducing agrarian reforms, conferment of ownership on tenants, ceiling on land holding and for certain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2003 (SC)

State of H.P. Vs. M.P. Gupta

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)283; 2004(1)BLJR429; JT2003(10)SC32; 2003(10)SCALE522; (2004)2SCC349

..... shall take cognizance of any offence alleged to have been committed by any member of the armed forces of the union while acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official duty, except with the previous sanction of the central government.' the section falls in the chapter dealing with conditions requisite for initiation of proceedings. that is if the conditions mentioned ..... purporting, to act in the discharge of his official duty, no court shall take cognizance of such offence except with the previous sanction (a) in the case of person who is employed or, as the case may be, was at the time of commission of the alleged offence employed, in connection with the affairs of the union, of the central government;(b .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1980 (SC)

Minerva Mills Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1789; (1980)3SCC625; [1981]1SCR206; 1980(12)LC727(SC)

..... corollary to the proposed amendment of article 31a it was proposed in clause (5) of the bill to add in the 9th schedule two more state acts and four central acts which fell within the scope of clause (d) and (f) of the revised article 31a. vide clause (4) of the statement ' of ..... emergency was issued by the president on the advice of the prime minister and since this advice was given by the prime minister without consulting the council of ministers, which alone was competent under the government of india (transaction of business) rules, 1961 to deal with the question of issue of ..... cement : (1962)illj400sc ; krishnassvami naidu : [1964]7scr82 mukanchand : [1964]6scr903 ; nalla raja-reddy : [1967]3scr28 : jalan trading co. : (1966)iillj546sc ; kamrup : [1968]1scr561 ; mizo district council : [1967]1scr1012 ; balammal : [1969]1scr90 ; rashbehari panda : [1969]3scr374 and r. c. cooper : [1970]3scr530 .37. the argument of the learned additional solicitor general proceeds thus: for extracting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 2012 (SC)

Lalita Kumari Vs. Govt.of U.P.and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... enquiry before registering an fir and take further steps in the investigation.only in two cases in respect of the offence under prevention of corruption act which was to be investigated by the central bureau of investigation (cbi) this court taking note of the peculiar facts and circumstances of those cases, made an observation that where public ..... it fit to employ only the word 'information' without qualifying the said word. section 139 of the code of criminal procedure of 1861 (act 25 of 1861) passed by the legislative council of india read that 'every complaint or information' 3 preferred to an officer in charge of a police station should be reduced into writing ..... commission of cognizable offencev. to inform magistrate forthwith of the factum of the information received.14. reference has also been made to the celebrated judgment of the privy council in the case of emperor v. 1 khwaza nazim ahmad air 1945 pc 18 in which it is held that for the receipt and recording of an information .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1978 (SC)

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... edition, at p. 169, while dealing with the territorial application of british legislation has stated :it has been said by the judicial committee of the privy council that : 'an act of the imperial parliament today, unless it provides otherwise, applies to the whole of the united kingdom and to nothing outside the united kingdom : not even ..... proceeded to state the reasons for rejecting this argument in the following words :if there was any reason to think that section 3 of the act confers on the central government power to do anything which is in conflict with the constitution anything which violates any of the fundamental rights conferred by the constitution, that ..... by the government of india to inquire into excesses committed during the emergency and in respect of matters concerning maruti and its associate companies and the central government was of the view that the petitioner should be available in india to give evidence before these commissions of inquiry and she should have an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 1977 (SC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sankalchand Himatlal Sheth and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1977SC2328; (1977)GLR919; (1977)0GLR90; 1977LabIC1857; (1977)4SCC193; [1978]1SCR423

..... in the same session for such removal, on the ground of proved misbehavior or incapacity. thus, if the power of the president, who has to act on the advice of the council of ministers, to transfer a high court judge under article 222(1) is strictly limited to cases in which the transfer becomes necessary in order ..... affecting the entire high court judiciary. can a judge of a high court be transferred to another high court by the president, which in effect means by the central government, under article 222, clause (1) of the constitution without his consent? what is the true interpretation of this constitutional clause; does it necessarily imply such ..... , the power of judicial review over administrative action has to be exercised with circumspection and on substantial material-since the authorities are the president (i.e., the central cabinet) and the chief justice and the adversely affected dramatis personae are judges of the highest courts in the states. even so, the play must be according .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 1983 (SC)

Deena Alias Deen Dayal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC1155; 1983CriLJ1602; 1983(2)Crimes770(SC); 1983(2)SCALE340; (1983)4SCC645; [1984]1SCR1

..... on behalf of the petitioners.12. it is urged by shri jethmalani who appears on behalf of the government ot karnataka, as also on behalf of the bar council of india who were allowed to intervene in these proceedings, that every statute carries with it a strong presumption of constitutionality and a heavy burden lies upon those ..... death sentence while dealing with the president's power of pardon under article 72(1)(c) of the constitution.81. having given our most anxious consideration to the central point of inquiry, we have come to the conclusion that, on the basis of the material to which we have referred extensively, the state has discharged the ..... applying their ratio to supposedly identical situations. in ram krishna dalmia, the court was dealing with a challenge to section 3 of the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 and the notification issued by the central government under that section appointing a commission of inquiry to inquire into and report on the affairs of certain companies. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2004 (SC)

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

..... who, having undergone institutional training in a school or other institution affiliated to or recognized by a board or state council of technical education or any other authority which the central government may, by notification in the official gazette specify in this behalf, have passed the trade tests or examinations ..... ) defines 'designated trade' which means a trade of any vocational course which the central government, after consultation with the central apprenticeship council, may by notification in the official gazette specify as a designated trade for the purposes of this act. 10. section 2(f) deals with 'employer' which means any person who ..... . chapter iii of the act deals with the authorities like the powers of the apprenticeship adviser, powers of entry, inspection, etc. offences and penalties, etc. 33. section 37 deals with the power to make rules. in exercise of this power central government in consultation with central apprenticeship council has framed 'the apprenticeship .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2012 (SC)

The State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Saeed Sohail Sheikh

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... necessary to do so for the disposal of these appeals.4. superintendent of the bombay central prison appears to have addressed a letter to the special judge under the maharashtra control of organised crime act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the mcoc act) requesting for permission to transfer accused persons in three different bombay blast cases being mcoc ..... persons(1) having legal authority(2) to determine questions affecting rights of subjects and(3) having the duty to act judicially(4) act in excess of their legal authority-a writ of ..... , act in excess of their legal authority they are subject to the controlling jurisdiction of the king's bench division exercised in these writs."32. the court quoted with approval the decision in the king v. london county council [1931] 2 k.b. 215 according to which a rule of certiorari may issue; wherever a body of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //