Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: homoeopathy central council act 1973 chapter i preliminary Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 58 results (0.093 seconds)

P.V.Manohar Panth Vs. the State Bank of Hyderabad, Hasanparthi

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... medical practitioner can be called a registered medical practitioner (r.m.p).as for the alternative medicines, the parliament has also brought out an enactment namely homoeopathy central council act, 1973, an enactment analogous to the indian medical council of act, to regulate the activities of the practitioners of that branch of medicine. in fact, under the said enactment as well, there is a particular provision ..... in pari materia with section 27 of the indian council act. in fact, section 26 of the homeopathy central council act, 1973 speaks of the privileges of persons, who are enrolled under the central registration of homeopathy, and it is as follows: 26. (1) subject to the conditions and restrictions laid down in this act regarding practice of homoeopathy by persons possessing certain recognized medical qualifications, every person .....

B. Subba Reddy Vs. Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Re ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ALT113

..... , the scheme is statutory in nature and as such, any such scheme approved under the said act which is a central act cannot be defeated by a state legislation. in case of repugnancy between central and state acts, the central act alone prevails.78. in international finance corporation v. bihar state industrial development corporation (2005) 10 ..... been taken as present writ petition is misconceived one and not maintainable in law in view of the express provisions of section 32 of the act, which stipulates that provisions of sica and the schemes made thereunder shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law, except ..... amalgamation of a sick industrial company with another company, the provisions under section 72a of the income tax act, 1961 (43 of 1961) shall, subject to the modifications that the power of the central government under that section maybe exercised by the board without any recommendation by the specified authority referred to .....

Rani Sundarammani Vs. Govt. of A.P., Revenue Department and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(5)ALD184; 2006(4)ALT374

..... intermediaries between the peasant and the state and that the rights of such intermediaries should be abolished on payment of equitable compensation. in february 1947 the madras legislative council passed a resolution accepting the general principle of the abolition of the zamindari system and recommended to the government that legislation for the purpose be undertaken and brought ..... suit against any person denying or interested to deny his title to such right for declaration of his right under chapter vi of the specific relief act, 1963 (central act 47 of 1963) and the entry in the record of rights shall be amended in accordance with any such declaration.board standing ..... that punganoor zamin estate was notified on 07-09-1950 and was finally taken over by the government, under the a.p. estates (abolition and conversion into ryotwari) act (act 26 of 1948), on 22-07-1952. when the zamin was notified and taken over a representation was submitted by the zamindar to the government on 17-11-1952 .....

Commissioner of Endowments, Andhra Pradesh, Hyd. and anr. Vs. All Indi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD747; 2001(6)ALT539

..... law that a decision is not an authority on a point which was not argued [see mittal engineering works (p) ltd v. collector of central excise, : 1996(88)elt622(sc) ].in dias on jurisprudence, fifth edition at page 143, it is stated-pronouncements of law, which are ..... v deoki nandan aggarwal,air 1992 sc 96 and shiromanigurdwara prabandhakcommittee v som nath dass, : [2000]2scr705 . the learned counsel wouldurge that the act not only applies to hindureligious institutions alone but also tocharitable institutions belonging to the othercommunity and other endowments and inthis connection our attention has been drawnto ..... submit that whetherexclusion clause contained in the actpursuant whereto and in furtherance whereofa charitable and hindu religious institutionand endowments is created, attracts theprovisions of 1987 act must be consideredhaving regard to the scope, object andpurport thereof. strong reliance in thisconnection has been placed on shyamkishori devi v patna municipalcorporation, : .....

P. Nedumaran Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by the Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT291; 1993(2)ALT(Cri)188

..... in which the owner of the vessel was deemed to have abetted the unlawful immigration of passengers.36. lord simonds, speaking for the judicial committee of the privy council, expressed the view that international law does not recognise unqualified freedom of the open sea. he further observed :'for the freedom of the open sea, whatever those ..... the sovereignty or safety of the state to which the public vessel belongs ..'35. the doctrine of 'freedom of the open sea' came up for consideration before the privy council in naim molvan, owner of motor vessel 'asya' v. attorney-general for palestine, 1948 appeal cases p.351. the immigration ordinance, 1941 of palestine provided for exclusion ..... on the ground that they offend against articles 14, 21 and 22 or on the ground that a notification issued by the central government or the state government under section 9 (1) of the act constituting a designated court for any area or areas or for such case or class or group of cases as specified in the .....

Indian Banks Association Vs. Workmen of Syndicate Bank and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1997(4)ALT592; (1998)ILLJ23AP

..... with this the third proviso was added to 9 section 10(1)(d) of the industrial disputes act, which reads as follows :- 'provided also that where the dispute in relation to which the central government, is the appropriate government, it shall be competent for that government to refer the dispute to a labour court, or an industrial tribunal ..... require what is to be done, but also how it is to be done. the second test was drawn by justice hilbery in collins v. herloford shire county council 1947 6 kb 598 at 615. though there are some divergences of opinion regarding the second test, yet the supreme court, summing up the views, held that ..... and 546 of 1994, where after extensive examination of the earlier decision of the same court in the management of the indian bank v. the presiding officer, industrial tribunal (central), madras and another (supra) the bench reaffirmed the decision of the deposit collectors being workmen. we have already adverted to the decision earlier. in the indian bank case .....

Ghanta Infrastructures Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Provisio ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(2)ALT611

..... or(iii) the state bank of india; or(iv) a subsidiary bank; or(v) such other bank which the central government may, by notification, specify for the purposes of this act.section 2(k) of the act defines 'financial assistance' as:unless the context otherwise requires, 'financial assistance' means any loan or advance granted or any ..... law remedies. according to halsbury's laws of england 3rd ed. vol. 30, page-682, 'a public authority is a body not necessarily a county council, municipal corporation or other local authority which has public statutory duties to perform and which perform the duties and carries out its transactions for the benefit of the ..... the required clearances in respect of the new project.(iv) obtain for new project, noc from the state pollution control board;(vi) obtain approval/clearance from government/central electricity authority (cea) for the power purchase agreement required for new project, if any;69. the letter dated 16-2-2007 addressed by the petitioner-company to .....

A.P. Wine Dealers Association and ors. Vs. Deputy Director of Income-t ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : (2005)198CTR(AP)136; [2005]276ITR225(AP)

..... taking into account the standard of teaching offered by the two appellant colleges. the action was also supported by the state government. the central council of homoeopathy has also recognised these two colleges. the public interest was not in any manner adversely affected by the impugned decision.the students ..... bad as regards the others as well. it is unnecessary to pursue this question further, as we have held that the act is unconstitutional even as regards the appellant.'11. in bhartiya homoepathy college v. students council of homoepathy medical college, jaipur : [1998]1scr531 it was held at paras. 24 and 25 as hereunder (pages 1116 ..... community or disadvantaged groups and individuals or public interest by permitting any person, having no personal gain or private motivation or any other oblique consideration but acting bona fide and having sufficient interest in maintaining an action for judicial redress for public injury to put the judicial machinery in motion like actio popularis of .....

Kommisetty Nammalwar and Co. Rep. by Its Proprietor Kommisetty Nammalw ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(4)ALT431:AIR2009NOC2482(A.P)(F.B).

..... all with them, i should be bound to find some meaning and not to declare them void for uncertainty. (see pages 360 and 361).in fawcett properties v. buckingham county council (1960) 3 all er 503, lord denning approving the dictum of farwell, j. saidbut when a statute has some meaning, even though it is obscure, or several meanings, ..... the light of any discernible purpose or object, for which it is enacted. see district mining officer v. tata iron & steel co. : (2001) 7 scc 358, harbhajan singh v. press council of india : (2002) 3 scc 722 : air 2002 sc 1351, union of india v. hansoli devi : (2002) 7 scc 273 : air 2002 sc 3240, easland combines, coinbatore v. ..... is unnecessary. as regards the submission of occupied field suffice it to say that there is no repugnancy in the central and state legislation. at least none was made out. even if there would have been any the act having received assent of the president it is fully protected by article 254(2).103. in krishi upaj mandi samiti .....

M.A. Dharman, Son of Appukuttan Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by Secreta ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1991(1)ALT315

..... .6. it is brought to our notice that orders of detention were passed against the detenus under section 3(1) of the cofeposa act by the central government on 20-7-1990. though the same were not challenged by the detenus by way of separate wirt petitions, their cases were reviewed by ..... were filed.3. in all the writ petitions, the state of andhra pradesh, represented by the secretary to government, general administration department and the superintendent of central prison, visakhapatnam were impleaded as respondents 1 and 2. the directorate of revenue intelligence, whose officials arrested the detenus, impleaded itself as the 3rd respondent in all ..... act and produced before the viii metropolitan magistrate, visakhapatnam on 15-7-1990 seeking their remand. the learned magistrate remanded them to judicial custody till 30-7-1990 with a direction to produce the detenus before the court of special judge for economic offences, hyderabad for further remand. the detenus were thereupon lodged in the central .....