Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu succession amendment act 2005 section 4 omission of section 23 Court: andhra pradesh Page 10 of about 3,152 results (0.186 seconds)

Sep 11 1959 (HC)

Vadrevu Annapurnamma Vs. Vadrevu Bhima Sankararao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP359

..... the will and also to the improved right which she acquired by virtue of the hindu succession act (xxx of 1956) basing on which the two petitions filed for amendment of the plaint had been allowed by this court and the plaint had been permitted to be amended accordingly.6. the main point that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the ..... and that since an appeal has been preferred and since relief has to be given in this appeal and since it is during the pendency of this appeal that the hindu succession act came to be passed, the right of the plaintiff in this case could not be held to hava been excluded by sub-section (2).the decision in : ..... only take a limited interest. the answer to this question would depend on the interpretation to be put on s. 14 of the hindu succession act. it is clear that having regard to the hindu women's rights to property act (act xviii of 1937) the plaintiff will be entitled to a half share, in any case, in the plaint c schedule properties, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 1964 (HC)

Peddi Sivaiah and ors. Vs. Tekchand

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1966AP305

..... plaintiff to become the absolute owner of the property in accordance, with section 14 of the hindu succession act. it is sought that after the amendment, her claim should be decreed on that basis. i do not see any reason to permit any such amendment at this stage. even if such a permission is granted, it will not serve the purpose ..... of the 2nd plaintiff. both the courts below have held that the 1st defendant is the legally wedded wife of nagiah. under the hindu succession act therefore it is the widow who would inherit ..... have been in possession because she could have recovered possession from the plaintiffs who are trespassers. it is the widow therefore, who gets the absolute right under the hindu succession act. the 2nd plaintiff has no right as far as the suit property is concerned. the widow is entitled to get possession from tile 2nd plaintiff. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 1990 (HC)

Chakala Anjappa Vs. Betappagari Anjaneya Alias Anjappa and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1992(1)ALT544

..... the suit properties which are his self-acquired properties and that she has become the absolute owner of the suit properties by virtue of section 14 of the hindu succession act.6. the learned principal district munsif, madanapalle on a consideration of the oral and documentary evidence adduced before him came to the conclusion that ex.a- ..... herein. the suit was originally filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs possession over the plaint schedule properties. subsequently, the plaint was amended seeking the relief of declaration of title. the plaintiff is the father-in-law as well as the sister's husband of the first defendant. the second ..... and 2 does not arise. therefore, it may be presumed that the second defendant has executed ex.a- 1 in his capacity as the manager of the hindu joint family.18. as regards the question of adverse possession, it is in evidence that the plaintiff got some repairs effected and improvements made to the suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Bandarupalli Rama Murthy and ors. Vs. Bandarupalli Padmavathi and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD677

..... lifetime of 2nd defendant. the amendment of the hindu succession act, the 2nd defendant and her daughters conspired with 1st defendant and decided to keep the landed property of plaint b schedule in the name of die 3rd ..... 1st defendant and filed the suits in o.s. no. 50/76 and o.s. no. 80/77 on the file of sub-court, chirala. the amendment came into hindu succession act the plaintiff is a coparcener along with 1st defendant since 5-9-1985. the plaintiff is entitled to a share in the plaint b schedule property after the ..... of plaint b schedule property having put in possession of the same. the third defendant has no capacity to purchase the same. as per the provisions of the hindu succession act, the second defendant became absolute owner of the plaint b schedule property. the defendant has no outstandings. the second defendant is a cancer patient and underwent treatment at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 01 2015 (HC)

Smt. Nallamothu Siva Yogeswari? Rev Vs. State of a.P., Rep. by the Aut ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... land reforms appellate tribunal, eluru accepted the contention put-forth by the 1st respondent- state, disbelieved the unregistered gift deed, declined to apply the provisions of amended hindu succession act i.e. act 39 of 2005 to the facts of the case on the ground that the said plea was not taken in the claim petition and ultimately allowed the appeal ..... father. at the time of submitting declaration, her father erroneously mentioned her as one of the members of his family unit. after coming into force of hindu succession act as amended by act 39 of 2005 with effect from 09-9-2005, the daughter of a coparcener shall by birth become a coparcener in her own right in the same ..... this is a clear case wherein the petitioner is entitled to one standard holding in the coparcenary property in her own right under section 6 of the hindu succession act i.e. act 39 of 2005. the petitioner claims to be in possession of the property in question and no finality has so far been attached to the proceedings .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 1991 (HC)

Jagarlamudi Sujata and Another Vs. Jagarlamudi Jadadish Krishna Prasad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1992AP291; 1992(1)ALT503

..... property and therefore they are not necessary or proper parties to the suit. questioning the same this revision has been filed.3. section 16 of the hindu marriage act after it is amended by the amending act of 1976 reads as follows :--'sub-section (1):-- notwithstanding that a marriage is null and void under section 11, any child of such marriage who ..... of its parent in accordance with the provisions of s. 8 or s. 15, hindu succession act; (5) a child of a void marriage is related to its parents within the meaning of s.3(1)(j) hindu succession act because of the provisions of s. 16 hindu marriage act proviso to s.3(1)(j) must be confined to those children who are not ..... clothed with legitimacy under s. 16 h.m. act.' the view taken by the learned judges indicated above is that the property .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 1997 (HC)

Dasari Durgamma and anr. Vs. Dasari Gangisetti and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(2)ALD492; 1998(2)ALT298

..... continue the proceedings as legal heir of the deceased first appellant as she is only an adopted daughter of the deceased first appellant and under the hindu succession act an adopted daughter does not automatically succeed to the properties of the mother. in the absence of any document executed by the deceased plaintiff bequeathing or ..... view of the above discussion, the second appellant is entitled to continue as the legal heir representing the first plaintiff the lower court ought to have amended the judgment and decree by recording the presence of the second appellant as the legal representative of the first appellant. the subordinate judge committed an error ..... when the application was made or on the date ofi disposing of the appeal, namely, 5-4-1990. hence they filed the interlocutory application i for amendment of the decree which was rejected by the subordinate judge. the respondents have not substantiated their contention that tie first appellant died before filing of appeal. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2004 (HC)

inguva Saraswathi Vs. S. Vaddemani Sivarama Krishna Rao and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2004(4)ALD216; 2004(2)ALT510

..... trial, and the fifth defendant, who are no other than the brother and sister, were entitled to a share under sub-section (1) of section 15 of hindu succession act, 1956, (for brevity 'the act') inasmuch as the deceased first plaintiff would fall under the category of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 15 of the ..... the deceased first plaintiff as legatee, the averments made in the amended plaint that are more relevant, in brief, are as under:5. the mother of one sridharam murthamma was in possession of plaint a-schedule property, which was given ..... plaintiff came on record as legatee of the deceased first plaintiff through a will, dated 17.4.1989, and continued the suit and consequently, the plaint was also amended. inasmuch as the original plaintiff died, the averments made in the original plaint are of not much significant and since the second plaintiff who stepped into the shoes of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 2005 (HC)

Appana Venkata Lakshmi Vs. Chebrolu Ratna Manikyamba and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD526

..... below have applied wrong principles of law in denying the benefit of section 14 of the hindu succession act (for short 'the act') to the first defendant and her legal representatives. he submits that by operation of section 14 of the act, the life interest created in favour of the first defendant enlarged into an absolute right and ..... died, while the suit was pending. pleading that the vested remainder accrued to bhavanarayana and thereby, to his legal representatives, the prayer in the suit was amended to the one of declaration of title and recovery of possession. as observed earlier, the suit was decreed and the decree was upheld by the lower appellate ..... the principal junior civil judge, rajahmundry. the first respondent is the plaintiff. she filed the suit initially for the relief of perpetual injunction. thereafter, she amended the suit by incorporating the prayer for declaration of title and recovery of possession of the suit schedule property comprising of a room of 16 square yards at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2006 (HC)

Kommuru Rama Mohan Rao S/O Subba Rao Vs. V. Kanaka Durgaiah and the Or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ2235; 2007(1)ALD459

..... a legal representative to the estate of the deceased, is a claimant consequent upon her death, appellants would be her legal representatives by virtue of the provisions of the hindu succession act, and so the tribunal without dismissing the claim petition on the ground that there are no legal representatives to the estate of the deceased, ought to have arrived at ..... on the death of the second claimant, hema kumari, her property would devolve on the heirs of her husband. in the absence of class- i heirs, as per hindu succession act, property will devolve to class-ii heirs. as per entry vii in class-ii of the schedule father's brother is class-ii heir in the absence of father, children ..... of the deceased. since the deceased was aged about 24 years, as seen from ex.a. 2, panchanama of inquest, and since the accident occurred prior to 1994 amendment to the act coming into force, the multiplier as per bhagawandas v. mohd. arif 1987(2) a.l.t. 137 can be taken as '18'. though there is no reliable .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //