Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: hindu marriage act 1955 chapter 1 preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: patna Page 4 of about 398 results (0.075 seconds)

Feb 24 2011 (HC)

Vidyut Kumar Verma, and anr. Vs. Manju Kumari.

Court : Patna

..... filed by the respondent, manju kumari under section 12(1)(c) of the hindu marriage act has been allowed.2. the wife manju kumari who is respondent in this appeal filed the application under section 12(1)(c) of the hindu marriage act, 1955 for nullifying the marriage with the appellant no.1, vidyut kumar verma, which was numbered as ..... matrimonial case no.50 of 2001. according to this application, the consent of the wife-petitioner for marriage was obtained by the appellants by playing fraud as it ..... by her father. this objection furicated the petitioner and her father as a result of which they filed this application under section 12(1) (c) of the hindu marriage act.4. on the basis of the above pleading of the parties, the learned court below framed following issues:(i) is the matrimonial case maintainable in its present .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2011 (HC)

Tribhuwan Roy. Vs. State of Bihar, and ors.

Court : Patna

..... establish that the same was generated on the basis of his wife's independent income, failing which, petitioner would be guilty of criminal misconduct, punishable under the prevention of corruption act, 1988.7. before considering the submissions made by learned counsels for the parties, at the very outset, it has to be made clear that, the entire submissions of learned counsel ..... final assessment of the income tax department, in terms of the tribunal's order, and in reference to section 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988, under which sections a substantive criminal case is already pending against the petitioner, for the property amassed in his name and in the name of his family members, beyond .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2011 (HC)

Rajendra Rai, and ors. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... the allegations made in the complaint of the respondent no.5, basis of the f.i.r., the alleged acts on the part of the petitioners with regard to the demand of dowry, torture and cruelty etc. after the marriage at rohua p.s. jandaha district- vaishali on 22.06.2005 all were made at bihta under bihta police ..... . learned counsel appearing for the petitioner contends that from the allegations made in the complaint it would appear that the admitted position is that right from the date of marriage till she left her matrimonial home on 14.09.2005 due to the alleged demand, torture, cruelty etc. which have been allegedly committed at bihta within bihta p.s ..... no application in respect of the offence alleged in the present case.10. considering the rival submissions of the parties, it is not in dispute that as per complaint the marriage and alleged demand of dowry, torture, cruelty etc. on the part of the petitioner were all committed at bihta, district- patna within the state of bihar. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2011 (HC)

Baidhya Nath Chaudhary. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

1. The petitioner , who is husband of Opp.Party no.2 , has approached this Court, while invoking its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash an order dated 22.3.1997 passed in Maintenance Case No.8 of 1996 , whereby learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, (West) Muzaffarpur has allowed the petition filed on behalf of Opp.Party no.2 and directed the petitioner to pay maintenance allowance to Opp.Party no.2, failing which coercive steps would be taken for realization of due amount of maintenance allowance . The petitioner has further prayed for quashing of order dated 11.9.1998 passed in Cr. Revision No.106 of 1997 by learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur, whereby the revision preferred by the petitioner was rejected.2. In the petition filed by the petitioner, fact of the case has not been stated in detail; rather in cryptic manner certain facts were stated. However, after going through the impugned orders, actual fact ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

Sheo Pujan Rai. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... by the same order, took cognizance of the offence under sections 307/353/34 of the indian penal code and sections 25(1-b), 26 and 27 of the arms act.3. aggrieved with the order of cognizance as well as rejection of the petition filed by the petitioner, the petitioner approached this court by filing the present petition. on 23 ..... registered on 31.7.2001 for the offence under sections 399, 402 and 307 of the indian penal code and sections 25(1-b), 26 and 27 of the arms act and case was entrusted to an assistant sub inspector of police for investigation. after conducting investigation and collecting material, police submitted charge sheet against the petitioner and one suresh rajbhar ..... and others and learned magistrate took cognizance of the offence under sections 307/351/34 of the indian penal code and 25(1-b), 26 and 27 of the arms act against the petitioner and one another.2. short fact of the case is that on 31.7.2001, while officer incharge of rajpur police station along with armed forces .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

Gunjan SinhA. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... 2002 was registered on 24.7.2002 for the offence under section 302 of the indian penal code and section 3 (x) of sc/st (prevention of atrocities) act. however, after conducting investigation, the police submitted chargesheet under section 304 of the indian penal code against the petitioner and the learned chief judicial magistrate on the basis of ..... manner, the police firstly registered the f.i.r. for the offence under section 302 of the indian penal code and section 3 (x) of the sc/st act and, thereafter, in similar manner submitted chargesheet under section 304 of the indian penal code. learned counsel for the petitioner has emphasized that in absence of expert opinion, ..... would lead to shaking the mutual confidence between the doctor and the patient. every mishap or misfortune in the hospital or clinic of a doctor is not a gross act of negligence to try him for an offence of culpable negligence."7. in view of the law laid down by the apex court, sri akhileshwar prasad singh, learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

Ganga Darshan Ram. Vs. Sudhakar Rai, and ors.

Court : Patna

..... the decesed defendant no. 3 alleging therein that the right to sue survives and further that if deemed necessary the substitution petition be allowed invoking section 5 of the limitation act and under the facts and circumstances the trial court rejected the petition on one of the ground that though through a rejoinder petition a prayer for substitution cannot be allowed ..... . however, the hon'ble high court on appeal that a rejoinder having contend all the necessary facts and ingredients invoking section 5 of the limitation act as well as under order xxii rule 4 and 9 of the c.p.c. the court was not correct in observing that there was no application filed on behalf .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

The Chairman, Bank of India, and anr. Vs. State of Bihar, and ors.

Court : Patna

1. Two petitioners, while invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, have prayed for quashing of an order dated 18.11.2000 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Patna in Complaint Case No.1140(c) of 2000 and also subsequent orders whereby processes were directed to be issued for securing attendance of accused persons including both the petitioners.2. Short fact of the case is that the opposite party no.2 filed a complaint in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna, which was numbered as Complaint Case No.1140(c) of 2000 arraying the petitioners and other two as accused for commission of offence under Sections 420, 406, 409 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It was disclosed in the complaint petition that M/S Asian Alloys Ltd. (Accused No.1) had floated secured redeemable debentures highlighting attractive interest and other lucrative offers in the year 1997 in the brochure issued by the Company. The Bank of India was show...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

S. Sundaram. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

..... offence is made out against the petitioner. it was stated that the accused no.1 i.e. m/s synergy financial exchange ltd. approached the central bank of india to act as trustee to their proposed rights issued for non convertible debenture in 1995 and the bank agreed as debenture trustee for which a debenture trust deed was executed in between .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2011 (HC)

K.V.Krishnamurthy. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

..... passed in accordance with the provisions of the seventh schedule hereunder written. as the trustees shall not be bound to perform exercise or to do any such powers, acts or things or to take any such steps unless and until sufficient money shall have been provided or provision to the satisfaction of the trustees made for providing the ..... may be occasioned by reason thereof unless the trustees shall have been previously requested by notice in writing to perform exercise or do any of such powers, trusts, acts or things or to take any such steps as aforesaid by the holder or holders of atleast two third of the debentures for the time being outstanding or by ..... on redemption/maturity. it was submitted that the bank of india as trustee of debenture floated by the company m/s mafatlal finance ltd. (accused no.1) had acted in accordance with law. it was further submitted that the petitioner was appointed as chairman and managing director of the bank of india by the central government, ministry of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //