Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: high courts seals act 1950 Court: karnataka Page 14 of about 6,572 results (0.074 seconds)

The State of Karnataka Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1981KAR940; 1981(2)KarLJ58; [1981]48STC169(Kar)

..... the reasoning of the tribunal was that when there was an agreement for charging separately for the containers and the schedule to the act also specified different items mentioning different rates, the rates that are applicable to each one of the items should be considered and not only one of the rates which might be higher in regard to one of the ..... it also referred to the decision of the madras high court in k. ..... the court held that 'by reason of the provisions of the control order, which governed the transactions of sale of cement entered into by the assessee with the purchasers, the amount of freight formed part of the sale price within the meaning of the first part of the definition of that term in section 2(p) of the rajasthan act and section 2(h) of the central act and was includible in the turnover of the assessee'. ..... it is seen that under the provisions of the karnataka excise act, liquor had to be sold in sealed containers. ..... no such presumption can be made and especially so when separate rates are specified in the act itself in regard to the containers as well as the contents. ..... item 98 of the second schedule makes provision for tinned, canned and bottled foods and fruits including foods and fruits packed in sealed containers. ..... ' the tribunal further noticed that item 38 of the second schedule only mentioned liquor other than country liquor and did not specify that it should be sold in any sealed container. .....

Babu Rao Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT(Cri)581; 1993CriLJ2310; ILR1992KAR3804; 1992(4)KarLJ563

..... narcotic drug or psychotropic substance in respect of which he has reason to believe an offence punishable under chapter iv has been committed, and, along with such drug or substance, any animal or conveyance or article liable to confiscation under this act, any document or other article which he has reason to believe may furnish evidence of the commission of an offence punishable under chapter iv relating to such drug or substance; (b) detain and search any person whom he has reason to believe ..... state of manipur, 1991 cr lj 696 a division bench of the guahati high court observed thus at page 705 :'while enacting this section legislature had two intentions viz. ..... 4 who took up further investigation from pw 3 on 28-2-90 deposed that on 7-3-90 he sent the sealed packets to the forensic science laboratory through p.c. ..... ' in the present case, neither pw 3 nor pw 4 has stated that after receiving the sealed cover from pw 2 they sealed the same with their own seal. ..... 3 the cover in which the ganja packets were went back from the forensic science labour also did not bear the signature or the seal of the forensic science laboratory. ..... he has also not stated how and when the samples were taken or whether the samples taken were sealed with his seal.10. p.w. ..... no doubt pw 2 has stated that 17 packets of ganja were put in a cover and sealed with the seal 'ss'. ..... all those packets were put in a cover and then sealed by pw 2 with seal 'ss'. ..... all the packets were put in a cover with a seal bearing 'ss' mark. .....

Bandi Ramappa S/O Late Bheemappa Vs. the State of Karnataka Represente ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2008KAR4467; 2009(1)KarLJ687; 2008(3)KCCR1674(DB)

..... and this plenary right of the high court to issue a prerogative writ will not normally be exercised by the court to the exclusion of other available remedies unless such action of the state or its instrumentality is arbitrary and unreasonable so as to violate the constitutional mandate of article 14 or for other valid and legitimate reasons, for which the court thinks it necessary to exercise the said jurisdiction.in the instant case the controversy is not based on any disputed facts but it is based ..... undertaking to the respondents to the effect that the tender submitted by him shall not be withdrawn by him till the right of ketail vend of arrack is disposed of, he had every legal right under section 5 of the contract act to revoke the proposal given by him before the same could be accepted and its acceptance could be communicated to him by the 6th respondent. ..... reported in : [1977]1scr811 the learned aga submitted that the moment the appellant submitted his tender in sealed cover to the 6th respondent the contract came to be concluded as per the terms and conditions of the tender and therefore nothing was required to be done further by the appellant pursuant to submission of the ..... the last date for filing the sealed covers for the said offer was 9.5.1994 and accordingly the petitioner filed his forms of ..... the said date was fixed for opening of the tenders, it is also not in dispute that the appellant herein submitted his tender in sealed condition to the 6th respondent before 2 p.m. .....

Scania Commercial Vehicles India Pvt Ltd Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... of property - whoever cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being capable of converting into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.16. ..... the high court, therefore, should have posed a question as to whether any act of inducement on the part of the appellant has been raised by the second respondent and whether the appellant had an intention to cheat him from the ..... cheats and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either 19 description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to ..... and thereby dishonestly induces the person deceived to deliver any property to any person, or to make, alter or destroy the whole or any part of a valuable security, or anything which is signed or sealed, and which is capable of being converted into a valuable security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine .....

Chemansab S/o Khajasab Almel Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... contra, learned high court government pleader arguing in support of the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence contended that the trial court has rightly convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the ndps act and the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence does not suffer from any irregularity or illegality, which calls for interference at the hands of this court. ..... about the seizure of the ganja packets and also with regard to the samples that were collected from each bag and packed separately and thereafterwards sealed with the office seal bearing no.540 and over the seal, paper with the signature of pw-1 and the panch witnesses was sticked. ..... him, all the samples were taken by him and also sealed by him before taking the same to the police station. ..... has also admitted his signature in ex.p5 which is a specimen seal document and his signature in the said document is marked as ..... 98 bags, 30 grams of sample ganja was removed from 11 bags and they were packed separately and sealed and these 11 bags are marked as m.os.1 to 11 before the trial court. ..... 7 crl.a.200021/2017 13 carry bags, which were found in the car, 30 grams of ganja for the purpose of sample was removed and packed separately and sealed and these packets were marked as m.os.13 to 19.11. ..... prepared at the time of seizure is marked as ex.p3 and the certificate issued by the jurisdictional magistrate with regard to the sealed samples is marked as ex.p4. .....

Sri Y.N. Nanjappa, Retired Hal Employee S/O Sri Ningaiah Vs. State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2008Kant199; 2009(1)KarLJ177; 2008(4)KCCR2527; 2008(6)AIRKarR106

..... covered by annexure-b notification are:(a) stage carriages(b) contract carriages with seating capacity exceeding twelve (excluding driver), other than-(i) vehicles covered by permits issued under section 88(9) of the motor vehicles act 1988;(ii) vehicles covered by an authorisation certificate issued under rule 5 of motor vehicles (all india permit for transport operators) rules 1993;(c) maxi cabs; and(d) educational institutional buses;(e) goods vehicles ..... 5047 of 2008 in the hon'ble supreme court the hon'ble supreme court by order dated 10.03.2008 disposed of the special leave petition requesting the high court to dispose of the writ petition at the earliest and staying the interim order ..... kaloor joseph the hon'ble supreme court upheld the direction of the high court of kerala to fit speed governors on vehicles and granted ..... controlling device) conforming to the standard ais:018 as amended from time to time specified by the bureau of indian standards in such manner that the speed governor can be sealed with an official seal of the state transport authority or a regional transport authority in such a way that it cannot be removed or tampered without the ..... it is, therefore, clear that even if speed governors are not prescribed for a particular class of motor vehicles by any requirement of the act or the rules made thereunder, it is permissible for the authority concerned to require the fitting of the speed governors in such motor vehicles for the purpose of ensuring that there is no .....

Cotton Corporation of India Limited,bangalore Vs. G.C. Odusumath and O ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1998KAR2553; 1998(6)KarLJ181; (1999)ILLJ19Kant

..... that the appropriate government to make the saidreference under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1957 was the central government and not the state government'.before the high court it was conceded that the said company was not an industry carried on by the central government, but it was seriously contended for the petitioner-mazdoor union that it was in ..... relying on its constitution bench decision in agarwal's case, supra and western coal fields case, supreme court held:'in view of the above decisions of this court, we have no hesitation to hold that the high court erred in thinking that sail was a department of union of india and most of the reasons given in judgment are based on this wrong premise'.the legal proposition enunciated in the ..... (2) a deed signed by such an attorney on behalf of the company and under his seal where sealing is required, shall bind the company and have the same effect as if it were under its common seal'.section 49 envisages, inter alia, that subject to the exceptions stated therein 'all investments made by a company on its own behalf shall be made and ..... --(1) a company may, by writing under its common seal, empower any person, either generally or in respect of any specified matters, as its attorney, to execute deeds on its behalf ..... company and it stipulates that on registration the company shall become a body corporate capable forthwith of exercising all the functions of an incorporation company and having perpetual succession and common seal. .....

M/S Prime Industries, Bangalore, Rep. by Its Partner Manish Agarwal Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 38-c of the bombay act and section 26-b of the kerala act also contain non obstante clauses and give statutory recognition to the priority of the states charge over other debts, which was recognised by indian high courts even before 1950. ..... counsel for the applicant has relied on the decision of the division bench of the punjab and haryana high court, in the case of dhir and dhir asset reconstruction and securitization co. ..... by relying on the decisions of the honble supreme court, in the case of council for indian school certificate examination vs- isha mittal and another [(2000) 7 scc 521] and in the case of maharshi dayanand university vs- surjeet kaur [(2010) 11 scc 159] wherein it is held that the high court should decide the matters in accordance with law, it is contended that in the absence of provision, no right can be granted to the ..... in that direction, with regard to the options available to the secured creditor, the honble supreme court while considering the right of the tribunal to order sale under section 19(19) of the recovery of debts due to bank and financial institutions act, 1993 (rddb act for short) vis--vis companies act, in the case of andhra bank vs- official liquidator and another [(2005) 5 scc 75] has held that the secured creditors have ..... decision of the allahabad high court in bpl display devices ..... senior counsel for the second respondent, on the other hand relied on the decision of the division bench of the high court of madras in the case of k. .....

Consortium of Medical Engineering and Dental Colleges of Karnataka (Co ...

Court : Karnataka

..... (these writ appeals are filed under section 4 of the karnataka high court act praying to set aside the order passed in the writ petition no.15921/2012 c/w wp.nos.15917-15919/2012, wp.no.15922/2012, w.p.nos.16168-16171/2012 and wp.nos.16172-16174/2012 (edn-res) dated 25/05/2012 ..... while exercising the extraordinary power bestowed on the high court under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution, interference is called for and warranted only where a decision is perverse or is an exemplification of wednesbury unreasonableness ..... that they have not furnished demand draft from the nationalized bank as per the notified requirement; or secondly, they have not produced counterfoils; or thirdly, the produced counterfoils did not bear the bank seal; or fourthly that the counterfoils did not bear the signature of the bank officials. ..... since it is considered essential that the entire course should be attended, the apex court has specified the last date for admission to these courses as 31st may of each calendar year ..... it was also observed by the court that arranging demand drafts for rs.2,57,000/- is a difficult task, and that so far as the counterfoils, and the bank seal and officers signature thereon are concerned, the candidate could not be blamed for any deficiency or ..... candidature shall not be rejected merely because they have not obtained the d.d.s from the nationalized banks and/or because they have not produced the counter-foils and/or the counterfoils do not bear the seal and signature. .....

Giridhari Balaram Radhakrishnani and Another Vs. M/S Mahisa Electronic ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1995KAR2010

..... the grant and sealing of patent or the decision rendered by the authorities concerned in case of opposition does not guarantee the validity of the patent, which can be challenged in high court on various grounds in revocation or infringement proceedings as held in (m/s ..... it is urged that the leaned single judge ought to have considered the application filed under section 115 of the act for appointment of the scientific advisor and calling for a report from such advisor has resulted in miscarriage of justice. ..... the appellants contended that once the patent is sealed exclusive right vests with a patentee and in view of section 108 of the act injunction in favour of the patent holder in addition to damages or on account of profits should be ..... the learned single judge misconstrued the scope of an action for infringement under the act and did not appreciate the statutory right in favour of the appellants and the presumptions that arise ..... as the appellant could not file any suit until the patent was sealed, he applied for such sealing on 7-7-1987 and the patent was actually sealed on 23-2-1990 as provided under section 24 of the patents act, 1970 (for short the act). ..... appellants have obtained sealing of the patent under section 43 of the act, section 48 of the act confers on the patentee the exclusive right to ..... presumption of validity would attract to a patent granted by the controller under this act notwithstanding the examination and investigation made under sections 12 and 13 thereof. .....