Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
-1- in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur. order d.b.civil writ petition no.6210/2003 mangal singh & ors.v.state of rajasthan & ors.date of order :: 18th december, 2015 p r e s e n t hon'ble mr.justice govind mathur hon'ble miss justice jaishree thakur mr.p.p.choudhary, senior advocate, assisted by mr.ankur mathur, for the petitioners.mr.k.l.thakur, additional advocate general. mr.m.s.singhvi, senior advocate, assisted by mr.hemant dutt ].mr.h.s.sidhu ].for the respondents. mr.a.k.rajvanshi, for the union of india...by the court : (per hon'ble mathur,j.) the petitioners.who happen to be marginal farmers of district jodhpur, are before us to have some remedial measures by the state of rajasthan to ensure adequate retention of water with jaswant sagar dam, a dam that was constituted much back in the year 1889 by the former rulers of jodhpur state. the allegations of the petitioners are that :- (1)in the catchment area of the dam several illegal constructions including construction of anicuts/check -2- dams made and that is obstructing free flow of water to the dam; (2)several tubewells have been digged on the bed of the dam by the farmers having farming rights on bed land and that has damaged water retention potency of the dam; and (3)the government of rajasthan is not taking adequate interest to provide drinking water to the residents of town bilara and other nearby towns through other water projects than extraction of water by installing tubewells in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order: s.b.sales tax revision petition no.537/2005 assistant commissioner, circle 'c', udaipur versus telco construction & equipment company limited date of order :: 4.12.2013 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.v.k.mathur) mr.d.k.godara).for the petitioner/s. mr.varun singhvi for mr.dinesh mehta, for the respondent/s. ---- by the court: this revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 8.1.2003 passed by the rajasthan tax board, ajmer ('tax board').whereby the appeal filed by the respondent-assessee was accepted and the additional tax, penalty and interest was set-aside by the tax board. the facts in brief may be noticed thus : the business premises of the assessee was surveyed by the assistant commissioner, circle 'c', udaipur ('ac') on 3.10.2000, 7.10.2000, 16.10.2000 and 17.10.2000 and during the survey it was found that the assessee has during the period from 2 1.4.2000 to 31.9.2000 effected inter-state sales of hydraulic excavators on which 4% tax was payable, but the assessee for the purpose of evading tax has shown the same having been sold within the state and consequently, the assessing authority vide assessment order dated 12.2.2001 assessed the tax and imposed penalty and also levied interest. aggrieved against the assessment order, the respondent filed an appeal before the deputy commissioner (appeals).who vide order dated 4.10.2001 dismissed the appeal upholding the findings recorded .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur d.b.civil writ (pil) petition no.11584/2013 dinesh bothra v/s the state of rajasthan & ors. date of order::- 09.04.2015. present hon ble chief justice mr.sunil ambwani hon ble mr. justice ajit singh mr.sandeep shah for the petitioner. dr.p.s.bhati, addl.advocate general with ) mr.sajjan singh )-for the respondents. mr.manish shishodia ) order (reportable)by the court (per hon'ble sunil ambwani, chief justice) 1. by this writ petition filed in public interest for protection of environment, the petitioner, a public spirited person and permanent resident of district barmer, residing in the city of jodhpur for last 12 years, engaged in the occupation of journalist with the degrees of ma (journalism) and ll.b., practicing as an advocate, with several studies and articles concerning environment and sustainable development, has prayed for directions to declare the rules 37-p to 37-u inserted vide the notification dated 19.6.2012, under the rajasthan minor mineral concession rules, 1986, as illegal, without jurisdiction and ultra vires the notification issued by the central government under the environment (protection) act, 1986, and the environment (protection) rules, 1986. 2 the petitioner has also prayed for declaring all the actions taken in pursuance to the amended rules vide notification dated 19.6.2012 as well as advertisements dated 26.10.2012, 16.11.2012 and 30.11.2012 and the approval of environment management plans .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order : 1. s.b.civil writ petition no.8316/2015 sukhmandar singh v/s state of rajasthan & ors.2. s.b.civil writ petition no.5885/2015 raja ram & ors.v/s state of rajasthan & ors.date of order :: 21.9.2015 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.d.s.rajvi, for the petitioner/s. mr.s.m.toshniwal ) for the respondent/s. mr.b.s.sandhu ) ----- by the court: these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to question orders dated 18.12.2012 (annex.4).order dated 3.5.2015 (annex.6) and order dated 15.5.2015 (annex.7) issued by the special officer, water resources and chief engineer, water resources (north).hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of chak 1md to 6md.tehsil anoopgarh, district sriganganagar. the petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land from the state government and are consumers of water facilities provided under the irrigation and 2 drainage rules, 1955 ('the rules').the petitioners are utilising the irrigation facility from the momewali distributary. it is claimed that the authorities surveyed the area in the year 2001 and 2005 and two outlets situated in 1md and 4md were modified and rest of the outlets did not need any change as they were not taking any excess water. it is submitted that since 2005 neither any area has been included in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur :order : 1. s.b.civil writ petition no.8316/2015 sukhmandar singh v/s state of rajasthan & ors.2. s.b.civil writ petition no.5885/2015 raja ram & ors.v/s state of rajasthan & ors.date of order :: 21.9.2015 present hon'ble mr.justice arun bhansali mr.d.s.rajvi, for the petitioner/s. mr.s.m.toshniwal ) for the respondent/s. mr.b.s.sandhu ) ----- by the court: these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners seeking to question orders dated 18.12.2012 (annex.4).order dated 3.5.2015 (annex.6) and order dated 15.5.2015 (annex.7) issued by the special officer, water resources and chief engineer, water resources (north).hanumangarh and further a prayer has been made that the respondents be restrained from altering and amending the outlets of chak 1md to 6md.tehsil anoopgarh, district sriganganagar. the petitioners in the present writ petitions are agriculturists, most of them allottees of agriculture land from the state government and are consumers of water facilities provided under the irrigation and 2 drainage rules, 1955 ('the rules').the petitioners are utilising the irrigation facility from the momewali distributary. it is claimed that the authorities surveyed the area in the year 2001 and 2005 and two outlets situated in 1md and 4md were modified and rest of the outlets did not need any change as they were not taking any excess water. it is submitted that since 2005 neither any area has been included in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
[1]. in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment s.b. civil misc. appeal no.1223/2012 shanti lal vs. sonu & ors. civil misc. appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 against the judgment & award dated 21.02.2012 passed by motor accident claims tribunal, sirohi in motor accident claim case no.153/2010 (shanti lal vs. sonu & ors.). date of judgment: september 18, 2013 ::p r e s e n t:: hon'ble mr. justice p.k. lohra reportable mr. b.l. tiwari and mr. vivek shah, for the appellant. mr. n.a. rajpurohit, for respondent no.2 mr. r.k. singhal, for respondent no.3. *** by the court: the appellant, a hapless victim of road accident, has craved for justice in the instant appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act 1988 (for short, the act of 1988 ). cause of grievance of the appellant, as emerges out from the memo of appeal, is inadequacy of quantum of compensation awarded by the learned motor accident claims tribunal, sirohi (for short, 'learned tribunal') by its impugned award dated 21st of february 2012. [2]. apposite facts, arranged in the chronological order, are detailed herein under: on the fateful day of 11th of december 2009 at about 2:45 pm, while undertaking journey from gulabganj to revdar on a motorbike, which was driven at a moderate speed by its driver popatlal, the unfortunate calamity occurred near village dabani. although driver of the motorcycle with all precautions plied the vehicle towards left side of the road strictly .....
Tag this Judgment!