Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1995KAR193; 1995(1)KarLJ632
..... . in order to make available sufficient quality (quantity ?) of hank yarn at reasonable prices and also for the sustenance of handloom workers, it became necessary to reserve hank yarn for handloom sector by making it obligatory on the part of the manufacturers of yarn to pack a certain percentage of their production packet for ..... as well as the industry and such restriction is a reasonable one. there is no violation of any provision relating to the fundamental rights, much less article 14 or article 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india. they further contended that any export of coffee shall be made only under the provisions of the ..... appellants to manufacture something for which the appellants have not installed the necessary machinery and other super-structure and the notification, therefore, infracts their fundamental right under article 19(1)(g) of the constitution.25. the supreme court has briefly stated the substance of the objections of the respondents as stated in their statement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1992KAR2980; 1992(4)KarLJ631
..... open branch offices of the bank at such suitable places as may be decided by the board of directors of the bank with the approval of the reserve bank of india.(viii) to enter into participation with any of the scheduled banks or financing agencies for furtherance of its objects.(ix) to carry on ..... of india under the auspices of the all india khadi and village industries board, small scale industries board, all-india handicrafts board, coir board, all india handloom board, central silk board, state co-operative apex bank, etc. or otherwise under such terms and conditions as may be agreed upon by the bank and the ..... behind a corporate veil, carrying out governmental activity and governmental functions of vital public importance, there may be little difficulty in identifying the body as 'state' within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution [see: (i) p.k. ramachandra iyer v. union of india, : (1984)illj314sc ; (ii) central inland water transport corporation v. brojonath ganguli, : .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1980Kant130
..... of cloth to a particular sector. in these circumstances, there is no infraction of art. 14 of the constitution. but in any event by providing for the reservation to the handloom sector, it cannot be said that the object of the statute viz., proper function, distribute consumer is not achieved, a; contended by sri javali. 36. sri ..... 14 of the constitution. 39. as observed in ramanlal nagardas's case : air1961guj38 and other cases noticed in that case, the true scope and ambit of article 14 of the coinstitution have been well settled by the various rulings of the supreme court and the principles to be applied in determining the validity of any classification ..... number of cases and it is unnecessary to refer to all of them. from the decided cases the following principles may be taken as well settled. 34.. article 14 of the constitution guarantees equality of treatment to equals and not unequals. art. 14 of the constitution forbids class legislation but does not forbid reasonable classification .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1977Kant100; ILR1977KAR485; 1977(1)KarLJ187
..... may 1964, the committee submitted its detailed recommendations to the government of india. one of the recommendations of the committee was that the -production of colored sarees should be exclusively reserved for handlooms. after taking into consideration the recommendations,. the government of india passed a resolution of june 2, 1966 accepting in particular the aforesaid recommendation.on november 9, 1966, the textile ..... or the efficient prosecution of war or maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community, to provide by order for controlling the prices, or rates at which articles or things of any description whatever may be sold or hired and for relaxing any maximum or minimum limits otherwise imposed on such prices or rates. on september 25, 1946 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : AIR1975Kant215; ILR1976KAR80; 1975(2)KarLJ359
..... of improved technology was allowed to manufacture coloured sarees, the magnitude of the competition would be such as to totally destroy the handloom industry. looked from that angle, i do not think that the reservation of the production of coloured sarees to the hand-loom sector can be considered to be improper,the very provisions of the ..... constitution is it brought about a hostile discrimination between the owners of power-looms on the one hand and persons functioning in the handloom sector; and (iii) that the impugned notification was violative of article 19(1)(g) of the constitution.6. section 3(1) of the essential commodities act, 1955 which is in pari materia ..... on the production of certain commodity by a certain sector, there is hardly any ground for interference by the court in the exercise of its powers under article 226 of the constitution in the absence of any other material.it is significant to note that powerloom establishments having five or more powerlooms are prohibited from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it upholds the validity of minimum wage notification dated3012.2017 issued by the first respondent in no.kaa e41lmw2017and etc. these appeals, having heard and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, the chief justice delivered the following: - 206 - judgment overview these appeals take exception ..... of the board itself was illegal, as sufficient number of independent members were not there. he would urge that in case of beedi, cashew, handloom and power loom (cotton) industry, the state government had constituted a tripartite committee for revision of minimum wages. he submitted that appointing members of ..... in different industries. selective - 342 - application of a law according to the exigencies where it is sanctioned, ordinarily results in permissible classification. article 14 forbids class legislation but does not prohibit reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation. if the basis of classification is indicated expressly or by implication .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it upholds the validity of minimum wage notification dated3012.2017 issued by the first respondent in no.kaa e41lmw2017and etc. these appeals, having heard and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, the chief justice delivered the following: - 206 - judgment overview these appeals take exception ..... of the board itself was illegal, as sufficient number of independent members were not there. he would urge that in case of beedi, cashew, handloom and power loom (cotton) industry, the state government had constituted a tripartite committee for revision of minimum wages. he submitted that appointing members of ..... in different industries. selective - 342 - application of a law according to the exigencies where it is sanctioned, ordinarily results in permissible classification. article 14 forbids class legislation but does not prohibit reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation. if the basis of classification is indicated expressly or by implication .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it upholds the validity of minimum wage notification dated3012.2017 issued by the first respondent in no.kaa e41lmw2017and etc. these appeals, having heard and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, the chief justice delivered the following: - 206 - judgment overview these appeals take exception ..... of the board itself was illegal, as sufficient number of independent members were not there. he would urge that in case of beedi, cashew, handloom and power loom (cotton) industry, the state government had constituted a tripartite committee for revision of minimum wages. he submitted that appointing members of ..... in different industries. selective - 342 - application of a law according to the exigencies where it is sanctioned, ordinarily results in permissible classification. article 14 forbids class legislation but does not prohibit reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation. if the basis of classification is indicated expressly or by implication .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it upholds the validity of minimum wage notification dated3012.2017 issued by the first respondent in no.kaa e41lmw2017and etc. these appeals, having heard and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, the chief justice delivered the following: - 206 - judgment overview these appeals take exception ..... of the board itself was illegal, as sufficient number of independent members were not there. he would urge that in case of beedi, cashew, handloom and power loom (cotton) industry, the state government had constituted a tripartite committee for revision of minimum wages. he submitted that appointing members of ..... in different industries. selective - 342 - application of a law according to the exigencies where it is sanctioned, ordinarily results in permissible classification. article 14 forbids class legislation but does not prohibit reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation. if the basis of classification is indicated expressly or by implication .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... it upholds the validity of minimum wage notification dated3012.2017 issued by the first respondent in no.kaa e41lmw2017and etc. these appeals, having heard and reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement of judgment, this day, the chief justice delivered the following: - 206 - judgment overview these appeals take exception ..... of the board itself was illegal, as sufficient number of independent members were not there. he would urge that in case of beedi, cashew, handloom and power loom (cotton) industry, the state government had constituted a tripartite committee for revision of minimum wages. he submitted that appointing members of ..... in different industries. selective - 342 - application of a law according to the exigencies where it is sanctioned, ordinarily results in permissible classification. article 14 forbids class legislation but does not prohibit reasonable classification for the purpose of legislation. if the basis of classification is indicated expressly or by implication .....
Tag this Judgment!