Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: half light Court: mumbai Page 96 of about 14,111 results (0.029 seconds)

Michael Lorence Lopis and Others Vs. Joseph Lorence Lopis and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... appear to be very feeble and debilitated; and evidence adduced may not succeed in removing the legitimate doubt as to the mental capacity of the testator; the dispositions made in the will may appear to be unnatural, improbable or unfair in the light of relevant circumstances; or, the will may otherwise indicate that the said dispositions may not be the result of the testator's free will and mind ..... . as in the present case, the two executors are sons of a half-blood brother of saroj bala, whereas the objectors descendants of a full blood sister, the disinheritance of latter could not have been taken as a suspicious circumstance, when some of her descendants are even beneficiaries under the ..... the entire work in the sub-registrar chamber was completed within half an hour. .....

Vinod Vithal Ruke Vs. Vithal Bhaguram Ruke

Court : Mumbai

p.c. 1. heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. by this appeal from order appellant original defendant challenges the order dated 05.08.2013 passed by the bombay city civil court, dindoshi, goregaon(e), mumbai in notice of motion no.1391 of 2011 in s.c. suit no.1180 of 2011 directing appellant, his wife and children to remove themselves from the suit premises i.e. room no.401, kushinara co-op. housing society ltd. chuim village, dr. ambedkar road, khar (west) mumbai 400 052, admeasuring area of 225 sq. ft (carpet area). 3. this is an unfortunate case, where the respondent original plaintiff-father wants that the appellant original defendant-son should be removed from the family house as he has become nuisance to him. 4. for the sake of convenience hereinafter the appellant referred as defendant and respondent as plaintiff as per their nomenclature appears in the suit before the trial court. 5. a few facts of the matter are as under : i) the plaintiff has been allotted room premises bearing room no.401, kushinara co-op. housing society ltd. chuim village, dr. ambedkar road, khar (west) mumbai 400 052, admeasuring area of 225 sq. ft (carpet area) in lieu of his old structure, which was demolished under slum rehabilitation scheme. plaintiff is residing in the said suit flat along with their son defendant, his two unmarried daughters and one married daughter. as the defendant started harassing the plaintiff from time to time, plaintiff filed complaint with the police station on .....

Metec Asia Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)(95)ELT440Tri(Mum.)bai

..... antimony found therein is foreign goods no records are maintained, and small chit was written in loose paper that it was received around one and half months back from one rajendrababu, as per the say of anil mishra. ..... the bombay high court decision should be seen in the light of the above. ..... he has written on a loose paper that the antimony was received from one rajendrababu around one and half months ago. .....

Rajendra Agarwal and ors. Vs. Cc(P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)(71)LC812Tri(Mum.)bai

..... antimony found therein is foreign goods no records are maintained, and small chit was written in loose paper that it was received around one and half months back from one rajendrababu, as per the say of anil mishra. ..... he has written on a loose paper that the antimony was received from one rajendrababu around one and half months ago.surajbhai sunil agarwal looks after the accounts of m/s. ..... the bombay high court decision should be seen in the light of the above. .....

India Cane House Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1999)(108)ELT240Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the test mentioned in the supreme court judgment has to be seen by the jurisdictional collector in the light of the judgment of the supreme court as we are remanding the matter to it.moreover it has been specifically stated by the appellant in the reply to show cause notice sent on 24-2-1992 at para 14 of the same that in most of the purchases .....

Bfc Officers' Welfare Trust No. Vi Vs. Income-Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)63ITD169(Mum.)

..... we have heard the rival submissions in the light of the material placed before us and the precedents relied upon. .....

Oval Shiv-shanti Bhuvan Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2001)78ITD403(Mum.)

..... after consideration, the larger bench of the tribunal held that by stipulating in its bye-laws that in every permitted disposition or devolution or of dealing with the plot or buildings in the society, half of the premium and excess of capital cost received by a member shall be paid to it, the society has clearly secured to itself a source of income. ..... all that the clause provides is that the society will receive half the profits when the member sells his interest. .....

Datamatics Financial Services Vs. Jcit, Special Range-25

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)95TTJ(Mum.)944

..... we have carefully considered the rival submission in the light of material placed before us. .....

Indian Oil Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit, Special Range 2

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2005)4SOT1(Mum.)

..... and fuel oil fall under the expression 'mineral oil'.for the purposes of section 80hhc the expression of 'mineral oil' has not been defined.therefore, this expression has to be interpreted and understood in the light of dictionary definitions and the observations made by the bombay high court in the two cases which have been referred to in the order of the learned cit(a) and also relied upon by both the sides before .....

Realty Finance and Leasing (P) Ltd. Vs. Ito

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2006)5SOT348(Mum.)

this appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of commissioner (appeals)-xxxii, mumbai dated 3-3-2004 for assessment year 1999-2000. the proceedings are initiated under section 143(3) of the income tax act, 1961.ground no. 2 is with regard to the claim of depreciation of rs. 1,60,000 in respect of nariman bhavan property.the assessee has claimed depreciation of rs. 1,60,000 on the nariman bhavan property which was let out upto assessment year 1998-99 and the rental income was being assessed under the head "income from other sources". the case of the assessee is that, during the year the said property was not let out and it has been occupied by the assessee for its own use. the assessing officer did not allow the claim on the basis that merely because the property did not let out during the year the assessee cannot change the head of income and claim the depreciation in respect of said property. the learned commissioner (appeals) upheld the order of the assessing officer and held that the assessee was not engaged in the business during the relevant previous year and its claim regarding utilization of nariman bhavan property for business purpose is without any basis and consequently the claim of depreciation is not admissible merely because property was lying vacant and there was no income derived therefrom.the learned counsel for the assessee miss ritika garg stated that even if the property is not used by the assessee during the year, the depreciation has to .....