Court : Mumbai Goa
..... daman and diu 21 (4) union territory of goa, daman and diu and another vs. lakshimibai narayan patil, (1990) 4 scc 102; (5) thimmaiahvs. shabira and ors., air 2008 sc 1275; (6) edukantikistamma (dead) through lrs. and ors. vs. s. venkatareddy (dead) through lrs. and ors., (2010) 1 scc 756; (7) kalyanmadgaocar vs. dattaram ..... sc 340; (b) amritbhikaji kale vs. kashinath janardhan trade, 1983 air (sc) 643; (c) state of maharashtra vs. pravin jethalal kamdar, 2000 air (sc) 1099; (d) gram panchayat of village naulakha vs. ujagar singh, 2000 air (sc) 3272; (e) state of andhra pradesh vs. t. suryachandra rao, 2005 air (sc) 3110; (f) pralhadjaganath ..... cuelim, admeasuring 30,887 sq. metres to defendant no.3/respondent no.3, after seeking permission from the mamlatdar under the provisions of the agricultural tenancy act, 1964. in view of this admitted position, what emerges is that according to the defendants themselves the above referred properties are tenanted agricultural properties. this being .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... daman and diu 21 (4) union territory of goa, daman and diu and another vs. lakshimibai narayan patil, (1990) 4 scc 102; (5) thimmaiahvs. shabira and ors., air 2008 sc 1275; (6) edukantikistamma (dead) through lrs. and ors. vs. s. venkatareddy (dead) through lrs. and ors., (2010) 1 scc 756; (7) kalyanmadgaocar vs. dattaram ..... sc 340; (b) amritbhikaji kale vs. kashinath janardhan trade, 1983 air (sc) 643; (c) state of maharashtra vs. pravin jethalal kamdar, 2000 air (sc) 1099; (d) gram panchayat of village naulakha vs. ujagar singh, 2000 air (sc) 3272; (e) state of andhra pradesh vs. t. suryachandra rao, 2005 air (sc) 3110; (f) pralhadjaganath ..... cuelim, admeasuring 30,887 sq. metres to defendant no.3/respondent no.3, after seeking permission from the mamlatdar under the provisions of the agricultural tenancy act, 1964. in view of this admitted position, what emerges is that according to the defendants themselves the above referred properties are tenanted agricultural properties. this being .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... 91/1, 91/4, 91/3, p1/5 and 91/6 of village cavelossim. the said application was forwarded to the mamlatdar of salcete on 04.11.2008 and the report was accordingly submitted. it is further contended that the town and country planning department (tcp) recommended conversion of the property forming part of the property ..... affected. it is an admitted position that as far as the alleged crz violations are concerned effecting the environment, proceedings have been initiated under the green tribunal act, which are pending for consideration. in such circumstances, we are not inclined to examine the alleged contentions of the petitioners with regards to the alleged destruction ..... up. the drains which were relocated were for the purpose of allowing the drainage of water to river sal after obtaining the requisite permission under the irrigation act from the concerned authorities. it was also pointed out that the noc was granted by the town and country planning authority much before the notification of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Goa
..... taken against him. the accused has been in detention as from 9/3/2006. thus, six years and more than three months have passed. the conviction is dated 8/4/2008. in our opinion, the sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment coupled with payment of fine of rs. 10,000/- would be just and reasonable punishment, in the facts and ..... sentence for murder imposed by the trial court cannot be sustained. 48. as has been rightly held by the learned trial judge, the evidence on record duly proves the act of the accused of destroying evidence of offence by burying the dead body of the deceased in the trench and making false statement about suicide being committed by her. the ..... of himachal pradesh vs. jeet singh, (1999 cri. l.j 2025), wherein the hon'ble apex court has held that there is nothing in section 27 of the evidence act which renders the evidence of the accused inadmissible if recovery of the articles was made from any place which is open and accessible to others. the learned trial judge has .....
Tag this Judgment!