Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed section 266 functions of public service commissions Page 2 of about 188 results (0.192 seconds)

In Re: Major F.K. Mistry

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ44

..... previous section, viz., those which are, or may become vested in the crown by statute 21 and 22, victoria, chapter 106, entitled 'an act for the better government of india'. according to section 5 of the indian penal code, this act is not intended to repeal, vary or suspend any special or local law. moreover, section 5 of the criminal procedure code, enacts that all offences ..... military and non-military offences and the necessity of handing over a person governed by the army act, to the ordinary criminal courts even in cases of offences not mentioned specifically in section 41. 12. though ' the regulations for the army in india ' issued under the authority of the government of india are not to be considered as of any binding authority to be followed .....

The Assistant Collector, Tiruvallur Vs. C. Ramamoorthy (Died) and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1990Mad185

..... of the powers of the parliament under the proviso to art. 254(2) of the constitution of india, pointed out that under that proviso, parliament can do what the central legislature could not under s. 107(2) of the government of india act, and enact a law adding to, amending, varying or repealing a law of the state, ..... when it relates to a matter mentioned in the concurrent list and that under the constitution, parliament acting under the proviso to art. 254(2) could repeal a ..... , tika ramji v. state of uttar pradesh, : [1956]1scr393 , m. karunanidhi v. union of india, : 1979crilj773 , t. barai v. henry ah hoe, : 1983crilj164 and lalbhai v. addl. special land acquisition officer, ahmedabad, : air1986guj24 . on the other hand, learned government pleader made a faint attempt to maintain that the rate of interest should be restricted to 4% p.a .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Tulsiram Patel and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC1416; (1985)87BOMLR563; (1985)3CompLJ45(SC); [1985(51)FLR362]; (1985)IILLJ206SC; 1985(2)SCALE133; (1985)3SCC398; [1985]Supp2SCR131; 1985(2)SLJ145(SC)

..... thereon as might appear to him to be just and equitable.19. the position which prevailed with respect to the civil services in india during the intervening period between the government of india act, 1919, and the government of india act, 1935 (25 & 26 geo. v, c. 42) was that the top echelons of the important services, especially those working ..... should also bear in mind that clause (c) of the second proviso and clause (3) of article 311 did not feature in section 240 of the government of india act, 1935, but were new provisions consciously introduced by the constituent assembly in article 311. those who formed the constituent assembly were not the advocates of a despotic ..... (2), an additional clause, lively, clause (c) has been added thereto. a provision similar to clause (3) of article 311 was also absent from the government of india act, 1935. thus, while on the one hand article 311 enlarges the projection afforded to civil servants, on the other hand it increases by one the number of .....

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Patna

..... in this case before the 5th of january, 1948 no fresh proceedings could be commenced after that date for violation of the provisions of the defence of india act.section 102(4) of the government of india act, under the provisions of which possibly the prosecution of the respondents for offences committed by them could have been justified and continued, was also repealed by the ..... orders made thereunder. the respondent prayed for quashing of the proceeding on the ground that the trial could not be continued because the defence of india act and the rules framed thereunder had expired, and because the government of india act, 1935 had also been repealed by the constitution. having failed before the trial magistrate and the sessions judge, the respondent approached the high court .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

..... the words 'pursuant to article 225 of the constitution' for the words 'pursuant to section 108 of the government india act' in clause 15 of the letters patent, the words 'the provisions of section 107 of the government of india act' should now be read as 'the provisions of article 227 of the constitution'. under clause 15 of ..... court had origin in the ordinary law made by imperial parliament. (para. 8 of the judgment).(4) the phraseology of the letters patent, the government of india act, 1915, and the government of india act, 1985, 'makes it evidently obvious that when these words 'original' or 'appellate' are used those have reference to legal jurisdictions of the high ..... been kept alive by article 225 of the constitution, an that this power had been reaffirmed with greater vigour by section 108 of the government of india act, 1915, section 223 of the government of india act, 1935. and by article 225 of the constitution. it said (p. 360) :. .the high courts still enjoy the same unfettered .....

Krishnaswami Reddiar Alias Rajah Chidambara Reddiar Vs. Venugopala Red ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1942Mad614; (1942)1MLJ137

..... law. as to the interpretation of the act, the interpretation act of 1889 is obviously of great importance. the government of india act, 1935, repealed the government of india act of 1915 wholly, and virtually the whole of the acts of 1916 and 1919. section 223 of the government of india act specifically provides that the jurisdiction in the ..... has been rightly prosecuting his suit in a court for several years should be held now to be in the wrong court. the government of india act could have contained an express provision to the effect, that suits previously within the jurisdiction of burma and indian courts affecting immovable ..... government of india act. they correspond with sections 148 and 149 of the government of burma act, except of course that in the burma act the word 'burma' is substituted for 'british india'. section 292 of the government of india act is as follows:existing law of india to continue in force. notwithstanding the repeal by this act of the government of india act .....

Kartar Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... as civil rule, this court requires to recapitulate the fact of the case which is summarised hereinbelow.5. the petitioner on his superannuation from the defence department, government of india, had owned a residential house in kiran line basti, state of meghalaya, which is situated within the cantonment area. the residential area being within the cantonment area ..... . on the other hand, under the mes rules, the definition of 'consumer' is given in section 2(c) of the indian electricity act, 1910. the government of india represented by the mes is the 'licensee'. furthermore, mes no. i.a.f.w. 2191 deals with the rules for the supply of electric energy ..... act and the new act 36 of 2003 under the head of consumer, as the same definition has been adopted by the mes rules as indicated above. admittedly, the energy was supplied for the use of the petitioner, who being the occupier of the premises connected with the licensee's electric system i.e. mes. mes being a licensee under the government of india .....

Motor General Traders and anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1983(2)SCALE513; (1984)1SCC222; [1984]1SCR594; 1984(16)LC6(SC)

..... under clause (b) is not restricted to any specific period as it was in the notifications issued under the repealed acts. now was it made applicable to new buildings as suggested by the government of india by laying down a specific period during which they would be considered as new purposes of exemption. the constitutionality of this ..... activity and he also brought to its notice that the state government had issued the above said orders exempting the new building from ..... at the time when the bill which later became the act was being considered by the joint select committee of the state legislature, the chairman of the committee informed the committee that the government of india had advised that new buildings should be exempted from the act as it would be an incentive to the house building .....

Gobordhone Das Deora Vs. Doolichand Sethia and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 61Ind.Cas.210

..... of the civil jurisdiction of the court. but the letters patent contain provisions relating to both those jurisdictions; and neither the letters patent nor the government of india act afford any criterion for determining whether any particular proceeding in a subordinate court is civil or criminal in its nature. the nature of the proceeding ..... tribunal is not a 'criminal court' and the courts subject to superintendence are not specified. moreover, the terms 'appeal' and 'appellate jurisdiction,' as used in the government of india act and the letters patent, have generally been understood as including 'revision' and provisional jurisdiction 'shew prosad bungshidhur v. ram chunder haribux 23 ind. cas. 977 : ..... of a new court sexed the prerogative of the crown, but whether it does so or not it is expressly provided by section 84 of the government of india act, 1915, as amended in 1916, that a law made by a local legislature shall not be deemed invalid solely because it affects the prerogative of .....

In Re: the Bill to Amend S. 20 of the Sea Customs Act, 1878 and S. 3 o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1964]3SCR787

..... confinedwithin the territory of that unit is not liable to federal income-tax. this, inshort, was the scheme of sections 154 and 155 of the government of india act, 1935.now, if sections 154 and 155 of the government of india act, 1935 are contrastedwith arts. 285 and 289 of the constitution, one noticeable difference strikesone at once. the expression 'lands and buildings' in s. 155 ..... obviously includeall property to which the state can lay claim. the word 'property' is wideenough to include immovable as well as movable varieties. art. 289 departedfrom the language of the government of india act, 1935 by discarding 'lands orbuildings' and using the more comprehensive expression 'property', and inclause (2) qualified that word by 'any' and by 'used or occupied'. thecollocation of these expressions .....