Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: government of india act 1935 repealed chapter i distribution of powers Page 43 of about 517 results (0.123 seconds)

Shapiro Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... price advances, legislative action can no longer prudently be postponed. our national safety demands that we take steps at once to extend, clarify, and strengthen the authority of the government to act in the interest of the general welfare." doc.no.332, 77th cong., 1st sess. 3 (1941). [ footnote 7 ] see 87 cong.rec. 9148 (1941) for ..... is, of course, nothing in this provision to support the fine-spun exegesis which the court puts upon 202(g). the government admits as much by acknowledging that "the literal language of the compulsory testimony act possibly may be so read" as to support the present claim of immunity. but it urges that nothing page 335 u. s ..... u. s. 49 glosses upon innocent-looking legislation would thus be afforded. we agree with the government that congress gave the administrator broad powers for obtaining information as an aid to the administration and enforcement [ footnote 2/14 ] of the act, and that "the immunity provision of section 202(g) was inserted to insure a full .....

State of Kerala Represented by its Chief Secretary to Government and O ...

Court : Kerala

..... to any disaster situation and to provide requisite institutional mechanisms for drawing up and monitoring the implementation of the disaster management plans. under the 2005 act the state government issued state disaster management policy, dated 19.06.2010 under which district management plan, thiruvananthapuram 2014 was prepared. the city of thiruvananthapuram on account ..... .- (1) lands belonging to the government of any other state in india or the kerala state electricity board or to a university established by law or to any panchayat as defined in the kerala panchayat raj act, 1994 (13 of 1994) or any municipality as defined in the kerala municipality act, 1994 (20 of 1994) owned ..... or controlled by the government of kerala or .....

Man Haron Monis Vs. the Queen and Another

Court : Australia High Court

..... and perhaps some account taken of the fact that the services the "integrity" of which is to be protected are provided not by the executive government or any government business enterprise, but by a diverse group of commercial enterprises whose terms and conditions of carriage are not directly regulated. it is, however, not necessary ..... it was a temporary measure to provide for the posting and conveyance of letters until a post office was established under the postage act 1835 (nsw)[68]. the new south wales government took control of postal services from private entrepreneurs who had been vice-regal appointees. nevertheless, various functions of the postal service were contracted ..... hatred. indeed that may be the strength of reaction which the person making such a communication in relation to government or political matters wants and intends to cause. and if the sender of the communication acted reasonably, lange may provide the sender with a defence to an action for defamation. but s 471.12 .....

Ghulam Mohammad Numberdar and ors. Vs. Mohd. Bhat and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(1)JKJ325

..... mahendra naraian singh, air 1981 patna 133. shri shah pointed out that in terms of section 2(b) of the j&k; easements act, nothing contained in the act affects the right of the government to collect, retain and distribute water in streams. the collection, retention and distribution of water in natural streams is sovereign function and right ..... of dispute as to whether revocation of one farman resulted in revival of the previous farman. a constitution bench of the supreme court explained the judgement in union of india v. gwalior rayon silk mfg. (wvg.) co. ltd., air 1964 sc 1903 in these words:'whenever a dispute arises as to whether an order passed by ..... observations were made in the context of inter-state water dispute on a reference by the president of india under article 143 of the constitution of india. but though the context was 'inter-state' water dispute, the principle would govern intra-state water dispute as well. the relevant observations are: -'though the waters of an inter-state .....

Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai Vs. Ankita Sinha

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... benefit of seven generations down the line. 41 indian network for climate change assessment, climate change and india: a44 assessment - a sectoral and regional analysis for 2030s, ministry of environment and forests, government of india, 16 november 2010 42 secretary-general's remarks at the climate ambition summit. united nations. united nations ..... has been construed as a part of the right to life under article 21 of the constitution in the judicial pronouncement in india.4. the national environment tribunal act, 1995 was enacted to provide for strict liability for damages arising out of any accident occurring while handling any hazardous substance ..... property and the environment. however, the national environment tribunal, which had a very limited mandate, was not established. the national environment appellate authority act, 1997 was enacted to establish the national environment appellate authority to hear appeals with respect to restriction of areas in which any industries, operations or .....

Board of Control for Cricket Vs. Cricket Aasociation of Bihar .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... he or she: (a) (b) has attained the age of 70 years; (c) (d) is a minister or government servant or holds a public office; is declared to be insolvent, or of unsound mind; is not a citizen of india; 33 (e) holds any office or post in a sports or athletic association or federation apart from cricket; (f) ..... 2017 has now been approved by this court subject to the aforesaid modifications, we issue the following directions:1. the registrar of societies under the tamil nadu societies registration act, 1975 shall upon the presentation of the said constitution by the ceo, register the documents forthwith and report compliance by way of a report to the secretary general ..... or vice versa. this would ensure that after a period of six years involving two consecutive terms, a cooling off period would be attracted. allowing an individual to act as an office 30 bearer for six years in continuation, is a sufficiently long period for experience and knowledge gained to be deployed in the interest of the game .....

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court : US Supreme Court

..... for so doing. the limits imposed by the first and fourteenth amendments on governmental action may vary in their stringency depending on the capacity in which the government is acting. the government as proprietor, adderley v. florida, 385 u. s. 39 (1966), is, i believe, page 424 u. s. 291 permitted to affect putatively ..... century ago with respect to litigation conducted in the courts of the united states: "whether tested, therefore, by the requirements of the judiciary act, or by the usage of the government, or by the decisions of this court, it is clear that all such suits, so far as the interests of the united states ..... limit, almost twice as much money went to incumbents as to major party challengers. [ footnote 38 ] appellants contend that the act discriminates against challengers, because, while it limits contributions to all candidates, the government makes available other material resources to incumbents. see n 33, supra. yet, taking cognizance of the advantages and disadvantages of .....

National Federation of Independent Business Vs. Sebelius

Court : US Supreme Court

..... payment level gradually decreases, to a minimum of 90 percent. ibid. in light of the expansion in coverage mandated by the act, the federal government estimates that its medicaid spending will in-crease by approximately $100 billion per year, nearly 40 percent above current levels. statement of douglas w. elmendorf, ..... within the reach of a larger population of americans unable to afford it, the medicaid expansion is an extension of that basic aim. the medicaid act contains hundreds of provisions governing operation of the program, setting conditions ranging from limitation on payments to states for expend- itures attributable to taxes, 42 u. s. c. 1396a ..... to satisfy a recipient s obligations under the individual man-date. 1396a(k)(1), 1396u 7(b)(5), 18022(b). the af-fordable care act provides that the federal government will pay 100 percent of the costs of covering these newly eligible individuals through 2016. 1396d(y)(1). in the following years, the federal .....

California Vs. Zook

Court : US Supreme Court

..... . mc-35, 33 m.c.c. 69, 70. the second was an investigation into the subject of rules and regulations to govern brokers of passenger transportation subject to part ii of the interstate commerce act. the first investigation later disclosed, among other things, that the -- "board of public utilities and transportation of the city of los ..... sides and ends of such cars. there, mr. justice lamar said: "but the principle that the offender may, for one act, be prosecuted in two jurisdictions, has no application where one of the governments has exclusive page 336 u. s. 751 jurisdiction of the subject matter, and therefore the exclusive power to punish. such is ..... cannot be regulated unless the exemption in section 203(b)(9) is at least partially removed. the act does not give us power, without the removal of the exemption referred to, to prescribe reasonable rules and regulations governing, or to regulate in any other manner the operations of, travel bureaus. proper regulation of travel bureaus .....

Mcgowan Vs. Maryland

Court : US Supreme Court

..... state cannot compel one so to conduct himself as not to offend the religious scruples of another. the idea, as i understand it, was to limit the power of government to act in religious matters ( board of page 366 u. s. 564 education v. barnette, supra; mccollum v. board of education, 333 u. s. 203 ), not ..... refraining from work or recreation in deference to the majority's religious feelings about sunday is within every person's choice. by what authority can government compel it? cases are put where acts that are immoral by our standards, but not by the standards of other religious page 366 u. s. 574 groups are made criminal. that ..... propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy, . . . that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order, and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself. . . ." "ii. be it enacted . .....