Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: goa daman and diu opinion poll act 1966 repealed section 28 offences at opinion poll Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 12 results (0.141 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2002CriLJ1880

..... stated about the accused having been informed of his right of being searched before a magistrate or a gazetted officer.19. the apex court in joseph fernandes v. state of goa (2000) 1 scc 707 : 2000 cri lj 3485 where the accused was informed that 'if you wish you may be searched in the presence of a gazetted officer or a .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Soran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1829

..... (1) of paragraph 26 concerns the legal position relating to both chance recovery and non-chance recovery of a contraband under the act. in mohinder kumar v. the state, panaji, goa air 1995 sc 1157 : 1995 cri lj 2074 it was further re-iterated that in respect of accidental recoveries :from the stage he had reason to believe that the accused ..... the accused.4. this observation appears to be at variance with the view taken by a three-judge bench of the supreme court in mahinder kumar v. the state, panaji, goa air 1995 sc 1157 : 1995 cri lj 2074. 5. in the circumstances, we are of the view that this case needs to be heard by a full bench of this .....

Village Papers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ99HP

..... observations of the full bench of the delhi high court were followed by a division bench of the bombay high court in sitaram vishnu shirodkar v. the administrator government of goa and ors. 1985-1-llj-480. in view of the provisions of law, there is no hesitation in following the views expressed by the full bench of the delhi high .....

Mrs. Vidya Stokes Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1833

..... conviction can be recorded unless it is shown that disregard to the alleged instructions, rules or regulations amount to any offence. in abdulla mohammed pagarkar v. state (union territory of goa, daman and diu), , the apex court dealt with a case in which a public servant and a contractor were prosecuted under the prevention of corruption act and sections 420, 468 and 471 .....

Fred Howard Haering Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1996HP27

ORDER1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 28-4-1994 (Annexure P-3), passed by the second respondent herein, directing the petitioner to leave this country within seven days from that date, failing which he shall be prosecuted under Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946.2. Briefly stated, the case of the petitioner, as could be gathered from the writ petition, is as follows: On 2-5-1993, the petitioner entered India, via Indira Gandhi Airport, New Delhi, as a representative of ThTec Industries, P.O. California, The petitioner is said to have reported himself before the Station House Officer (S.H.O.), Dalhousie, to register himself and the petitioner claims that on being informed by the Station House Officer that he had no registration forms to register the petitioner, an application on plain paper was made and this was accepted by the S.H.O., who also assured him that he would forward the same to the authorit...

Mohinder Pal Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995HP15

Bhawani Singh, J. 1. The petitionerhas challenged the constitutional validity of the Himachal Pradesh Kutlehar Forest (Acquisition of Management) Act, 1992 (hereafter shortly, 'the Management Acquisition Act' or 'this Act'), on numerous grounds being recorded in the latter part of this judgment. Before passing of this Act, the State Government issued Notification No. Rev. D(F)7-1/90, dated January 19, 1990, under Section 3 of the Punjab Resumption of Jagirs Article 1957 directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests to take over management and possession of Kutlehar Jagir Forest from the petitioner with the assistance of the Collector. This Notification was assailed by the petitioner through Civil Writ Petition No. 42 of 1990 (Shri Mohinder Pal v. State of Himachal Pradesh and others). By orders of January 22, 1990 and June 26, 1990, operation of this Notification was stayed and the writ petition admitted for hearing. Since both the actions of the respondents relate to the same f...

Dr. K.C. Malhotra Vs. the Chancellor, H.P. University, Shimla and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1995HP156

ORDER1. The petitioner Dr. K. C. Malhotra joined H. P. University since its very inception and had been posted as Dean of Sciences, Dean of Students Welfare and Dean of Studies. He as appointed as an acting vice Chancellor in the University of Himachal Pradesh on 18th January, 1986 and with effect from 1st March, 1986, he was appointed as Vice Chancellor for a period of five years as was then prescribed under the Himachal Pradesh University Act (hereinafter to be called as the Act). The Act was later on amended and the term of the office of the Vice Chancellor was reduced to three years. However, the petitioner continued to have renewal of the terms as Vice Chancellor and finally on 6th July, 1991, his terms of office of Vice Chancellor was renewed for a further period of three years vide order dated 6th~ July, 1991 (Annexure-PA). The petitioner's three years term was to expire in July, 1994 but in the meantime on 22nd September, 1993, a notification was issued by the respondent No. 1 ...

Mauji Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3662

..... the learned trial judge. we have therefore ruled it out of our consideration.10. in 1976 cri lj 132, jagdish b. rao v. govt. of the union territory of goa, daman and diu, it has been held that (at pp. 133- 134):8. the learned sessions judge in his judgment has addressed himself to the question of admissibility of the telephonic message as ..... given to the officer-in-charge of the police station. our view is supported in a good measure by the observation in the case of jagdish (1976 cri lj 132) (goa) (supra), in which it has been held that obtaining signatures of the first informant is a mere technicality of form and does not alter the basic character of the information .....

Lachhman Vs. Thunia

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1972HP69

Chet Ram Thakur, J. 1. This second appeal has been referred to a Full Bench as one of the questions which arose, when it came up for hearing before one of us, was whether the rights of the reversioners who had obtained a decree declaring that their rights were intact despite an alienation made by a widow, prior to the passing of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), were affected by the provisions of the Act. A Full Bench of the Punjab High Court in Amar Singhv. Sewa Ram, had, it was submitted, held that the rights of reversioners are' not governed by the provisions of the Act, but by the law prevailing before the commencement of the Act. This question arose, on the facts found by the lower courts, as detailed below.2. On the death of Shihnu, the last male holder of the property in dispute, his widow, Smt. Karju, succeeded as a limited owner of the estate left. On 22-5-1946, she gifted the land in dispute, which included her share in Shamilat land, to La...

Reliance Infrastructure Limited Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... the custodian general. the approval of the custodian general is to be taken first and thereafter other action can be taken.85. similarly, in a. chowgule and company limited v. goa foundation and ors. (2008) 12 scc 646, while dealing with the term 'prior approval' the apex court held as follows:a bare perusal of the aforesaid provisions would show that .....