Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: general insurance business nationalisation act 1972 section 36 exemptions Court: jammu and kashmir Page 1 of about 15 results (0.117 seconds)

Kashmir Motor Drivers Association and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) an ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1983J& K100

..... to whether the functions of the t. a. c. in revising the rates of premia is legislative or administrative, has still to be determined.10. general insurance business in india was nationalised by virtue of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972. numerous insurance companies were merged and reduced to only four in number to be called the acquiring companies, which are respondents 4 to 7 herein. by virtue ..... of section 4 of the act, all shares in the capital of each insurance company was transferred and made to vest in the central government. a corporation known as the general insurance corporation .....

O.P. Dogra and ors. Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1548

..... industry' includes a banking insurance or financial corporation. his second contention is that messrs. jupiter insurance co. having merged with the oriental fire and general insurance company, and the shares of the latter company having vested in the central government under the provisions of the general insurance business (nationalisation) act, 1972, hereinafter ..... company in accordance with the provisions of the companies act, to be known as the general insurance corporation of india for the purpose of superintending, controlling and carrying on the business of general insurance.(2) the authorised capital of the corporation shall be rupees seventy-five crores, divided ..... the central government has been empowered to form a government company to be known as the general insurance corporation of india for the purpose of superintending, controlling and carrying on the business of general insurance. this corporation, according to the petitioners, came to be formed by the government before october .....

The East India Hotels Ltd. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : [1982]49STC1(NULL)

..... , generally for the benefit of the students, the poor and the destitute. the same is true of university or legislator's hostels, guest-houses belonging to the state or the central government which are meant for the use of departmental officials, only and guest-houses maintained by nationalised or scheduled banks, or by nationalised insurance companies ..... needless to repeat, the other contentions of the petitioners that the act creates unreasonable restrictions on the right of the petitioners to carry on trade or business or to hold or acquire property, guaranteed to them under article 19, are wholly untenable and have been clearly repelled by their lordships as is obvious ..... the additional tax being recoverable from the dealer himself as confiscatory in nature, and its imposition created an unreasonable restriction on the dealer's right to carry on business and to acquire or hold property guaranteed by clauses (f) and (g) of .article 19(1) of the constitution; and thirdly, that the act was .....

New India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mst Nissa and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : III(2004)ACC605,2003(2)JKJ163

..... the distress and miseries of victims of accidents and reduce the profitability of the insurer in regard to occupational hazard undertaken by them by way of business activities and not to promote business interests of insurance companies even though they may be nationalised companies.'29. for the aforesaid reasons, as well as that the ld. judges ..... j&k; 105 full bench of this court considered the question whether insurer has any right to challenge quantum of compensation in appeal against an award of a claims tribunal ..... sc 3350 appears to be that insurer's grounds of contesting the award cannot be enlarged by any condition/clause of the insurance policy executed between insurer and insured and insurer is entitled to take only those defences which have been provided in section 149(2).7. in united fired general insurance company v. lakshmi short air 1982 .....

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2004ACJ2049

..... state bank of india, gandhi nagar, jammu and claimants who are not residing in jammu their fdrs be obtained from any nationalised bank payable at the place where the claimants reside. fdrs be handed over to the claimants after due verification.45. ..... the passengers. legal heirs have claimed compensation. in both sets of cases legal heirs have been successful. it is the insurance company which has challenged the decision so given.2. so far as the appeals pertaining to bomb blast are concerned, these ..... ) of the deceased jagdish raj. the deceased was 42 years of age. it is submitted that he was running the business of cement and iron at kishtwar. his income was projected at rs. 10,000 p.m. tribunal took a reasonable view ..... english workmen's compensation act, 1897. a full bench of the allahabad high court in the case of abida khatun v. general manager, diesel locomotive, varanasi, 1972 acj 489 (allahabad), considered the english decisions while determining the meaning and connotation of the .....

Sher-i-kashmir National Medical Institute Trust Vs. State of J and K a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... of a housing colony. village zoonimar and soura are two localities abreast each other. the money required for the purpose was obtained as loan from life insurance corporation of india against the mortgage of the aforesaid land with it. syed mir qasim was the chief minister of the state at the relevant time. ..... vice-chairman, apical selection committee; chairman, senior selection committee. height of things is that one r. k. sawheny, who is stated to be just a business man, having no academic record relating to medical profession, in his capacity as being member of the petitioner-trust, has been acting as a member in junior ..... sponsor, organize, establish and / or maintain hospitals, dispensaries, clinics, health centers, maternity homes etc. satisfied by the objectives and purpose of the petitioner-trust, whereas general public have been donating movable and immovable properties to the petitioner-trust, the government of jammu and kashmir, initially, vide order no.mp/214-me of 1976 dated .....

Sher-i-kashmir National Medical Institute Trust Vs. State of J and K a ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... state provides:(1) the executive power of the state shall extend, subject to any law made by the state legislature, to the carrying on of any trade or business, and to the grant, sale, disposition or mortgage of any property held for the purposes of the state, and to the purchase or acquisition of property for ..... the ground that the petition involved disputed questions of fact which could not be gone into in writ jurisdiction; that the petitioner had alternative remedy available under the general law and, therefore, could not invoke the remedy of writ petition; that the relief claimed in the writ petition amounted to seeking declaration of title to the ..... agreed to the establishment of the institute as per the terms and conditions contained in the agreement in view of the growing need of medicare among people in general, particularly those who could not afford to go out of state for specialized treatment, and to provide for post-graduate studies, research and training. in addition to .....

Mian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... of the society were concerned. it would not cover in its ambit, according to the argument, the concepts like the concept of political morality and business morality. nothing indecent or immoral could be said on the floor of the legislature. the impugned act, on the other hand would very likely encourage ..... equality nor denied the legislative right to classify. it has been taken a middle course. it has resolved the contradictory demands of legislative specialization and constitutional generality by a doctrine of reasonable classification. see joseph tussman and jacobus ten breck. 'the equal protection of laws', 37 california rev. 341.a reasonable classification ..... calculated to benefit weaker classes, when their vires is challenged in court, cast an obligation on the slate, particularly when notice is given to the advocate-general to support the law, if necessary by a brandeis brief and supply of socio-economic circumstances and statistics inspiring the enactment. courts cannot on their own, .....

Subash Chander Gupta and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2005(3)JKJ62,[2006]144STC217(NULL)

..... )the tender should be accompanied by emd @ 20% of the total net sale value or each lot quoted by way of demand draft/ pay order on any nationalised bank in favour of mstc, new delhi, payable at new delhi. this supersede clause -10 of the special terms and conditions of the tender enclosed herewith.upon ..... or within such further time as that authority may for sufficient reasons permit, a declaration duly filled and signed by the principal officer of the other place of business or his agent as the case may be, containing the prescribed particulars in the form to be prescribed by the commissioner, sales tax, alongwith the evidences ..... petitions. before this question is taken up for consideration, it is deemed necessary to briefly notice the terms and conditions governing the contract. the tender document contains general terms and conditions of tender as also the special terms and conditions. relevant extract of these terms and conditions is being reproduced hereunder:'date, time & venue of .....

United Fire and General Insurance Co. Ltd. and Etc. Vs. Lakshmi Shori ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... except in the manner provided for in sub-section (2) also supports this view. dealing with this aspect of the law, their lordships of the supreme court in british india general insurance co. ltd. v. itbar singh, air 1959 sc 1331, opined as follows (at pp. 1333-34):-- 'to start with it is necessary to remember that apart from the statute an ..... as are specified in section 96 (2) of the act and that it could not question the award of the tribunal on any other grounds. 15. in oriental fire and general insurance co. ltd v. vanita kalyani, 1972 acc cj 261, it was opined that apart from the defences which came within the scope of section 96 (2) of the act, an ..... high court in b. appa rao v. dunna mukanda rao, 1973 acc cj 222, and by the patna high court in howrah insurance co. ltd. v. yukti nath jha, 1974 acc cj 16 : (air 1973 pat 326). the madras high court in the general assurance society ltd. v. jayalakshmi ammal 1975 acc cj 159 : (air 1975 mad 198) after holding that an .....