Fruit - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: fruit Page 1 of about 128 results (0.017 seconds)Standard Fruit and Steamship Vs. United Fruit
Court: US Supreme Court
393 U.S. 406 STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO. v. UNITED FRUIT CO. ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMysore Fruit Products Limited and ors. Vs. Fruits and Vegetables (Spl. ...
Court: Karnataka
Reported in: 2004CriLJ340; ILR2004KAR426; 2004(1)KarLJ461; 2009(3)KCCR1580
ORDERHuluvadi G. Ramesh, J.1. This petition is filed assailing the order passed by the 7th Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bangalore...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmerican Fruit Growers, Inc. Vs. Brogdex Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
carries borax of small amount, but sufficient to render the fruit resistant to such decay, is invalid because the process was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVariety Dry Fruit Stores Vs. Variety Agencies
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 2010(3)ALT151
appellant, that there is a similarity when M/s. Variety Dry Fruit Stores run by the appellant and M/s. Variety Agencies run
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdams Fruit Co., Inc. Vs. Barrett
Court: US Supreme Court
injuries to migrant workers. In support of this position, Adams Fruit points to 29 U.S.C. 1871 (1982 ed.), which provides
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRayeen Fruit Company and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: 2000(3)AWC2001
are that the petitioners are engaged in wholesale business of fruits and vegetables situate at Subzi Mandi. Bahadurganj, Shahjahanpur. It has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJammu Fruit Association Vs. J.D.a and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Reported in: 2004(3)JKJ418
other strip of land for allotment to fruit traders and fruit growers in phase-I and phase-II. The respondents in their reply
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmerican Dry Fruit Stores Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1986)(25)ELT775Tri(Mum.)bai
year 1983-84, or 1984-85 or 1985-88 permitted import of. dry fruits by a trader under OGL appears incorrect. Neither the Policy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmerican Dry Fruits Stores Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1990)(48)ELT526Tri(Mum.)bai
Policy would not stand attracted and as such the dry fruits almonds, figs and raisins are permissible for import under REP
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLansa Fruit Co. Vs. Universal Ins. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Co. v. Universal Ins. Co., 302 U.S. 556 (1938) Lansa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal Insurance Co. No. 57
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>