Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: forest offence Sorted by: old Court: rajasthan Page 3 of about 11,820 results (0.048 seconds)

Feb 13 2006 (HC)

Sohan Lal Vs. State of Raj.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1569; 2006(3)WLC381

..... meanwhile, on 17.9.1999 one chand singh (pw-12) lodged a report at police station adarsh nagar, ajmer wherein he claimed that he is working at nursery of the forest department situated at mahapura, ajmer, he further claimed that in the morning while he was going to the nursery, when he was crossing the bridge on nasirabad ghati, he noticed a half naked body of a man lying in the water. ..... 2, bharatpur whereby both have been convicted for offences under sections 302/34 ipc and have been sentenced to life imprisonment and imposed with a fine of rs. ..... they have also been convicted for offence under section 364 ipc and have been sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment and imposed with a fine of rs. ..... eventually, a charge sheet for offences under sections 364 & 302/34 ipc was submitted by the police against both the appellants. ..... 302/1999) for offences under sections 364 & 120-b ipc.3. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2006 (HC)

Jawahari Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2857; 2006(3)WLC293

..... of sexual assault on a lady by any person is bound to give bad name to the victim and therefore, it is beyond imagination as to why victim of rape would save the real offender and name some innocent in such a heinous offence, more particularly when nothing has brought on record which could lead to infer false implication of the appellant. ..... criminal appeal by appellant jawahari lal arises out of the judgment and order dated 18-9-1984 passed by the learned sessions judge, kota, by which the learned judge has convicted the appellant for offence under sections 376, ipc and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 5 years.2. ..... , she disclosed the incident to her brother and thereafter she and her brother informed the police and lodged the oral report.on the above oral report, the police registered a case for offence under section 376, ipc vide fir, ext. ..... the incident took place at 12.00 noon in the forest while prosecutrix was busy in making bundle of grams in her ..... the learned magistrate having found the offence exclusively triable by the court of session, committed the case to the court of ..... when accused was committing the offence, witness panraj had also raised an alarm as to what were they ..... learned trial court, on the basis of evidence and material collected during investigation, framed charge against the appellant for offence under sections 376, ipc. ..... it is also well settled that a prosecutrix complaining of having been a victim of offence of rape is not an accomplice. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2008 (HC)

Balveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2008(3)WLN589

..... 146/2007 police station, raisinghnagar, for the offence under sections 41,42 of the forest act whereby the trial court dismissed the application filed by the petitioner seeking to release the wood seized.4. ..... rule 3 of the rules, 1957 pertains to exemption from forest produce and provides that in exercise of the powers conferred under the proviso to rule 2 of the rules, 1957, the state government exempts transportation of forest produce of the following species for destination within the state of rajasthan; namely eucalyptus, su-babul, ardu, vilaiti babul, israeli babul, deshi babul and shisham.7. ..... 19.01.1991 has been issued by the state government which provides that certain woods have been exempted from being forest produce and shisham, kikar etc. ..... fall in that category and thus according to learned counsel for the petitioner, the wood seized was not a forest produce.6. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2008 (HC)

Nand Lal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3133

..... order of sentence dated 13th of july 1988 passed by the sessions judge, dungarpur whereby the learned sessions judge has convicted the accused appellants, namely nandlal, motilal and bakshi in the offences under section 148, 189, 307, 307/149, 353/149 of indian penal code and section 42(1) of forest act and sentenced them as under:sentencenand lal 353/149 ipc 2 years' rigorousimprisonment and afine of rs. ..... the impugned order of conviction of the accused appellants in the offence under sections 148, 189, 307, 307/149, 353/149 ipc and section 42(1) of forest act and the order of sentence as aforesaid detailed, are ..... the factual matrix of the prosecution case as narrated in the fir ex.p/8 is that on 11th of february, 1983 at about 10.30 pm pw/7 surya singh , forester, came to the complainant pw/3 kartikeshwar on motor cycle and told that two trucks loaded with sagwan timber were to reach at the barrier, who were not having any pass or transit permit to ..... of bihar (2004) 13 scc 189, the hon'ble supreme court inter alia has held that to constitute an offence under section 307 , two ingredients of the offence must be present:(a) an intention of or knowledge relating to commission of murder; and(b) the doing of an act ..... 438 he has argued that for the proof of the commission of an offence under section 307 ipc the receipt of any injury on the part of the victim is not a ..... were charged with the offences under section 148, 307, 307/149, 353/149 and 189/149 ipc and section 42(1) of forest act. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2010 (HC)

Chamna @ Samiya Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

..... by judgment dated 2.5.2003 learned additional sessions judge (fast track) bali, convicted the accused appellant for an offence punishable under section 302 indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life term with a fine of rs. ..... however, the issue survives is that whether the offence committed by the accused amounts to murder as defined under section 300 ipc.14. ..... the conviction of the accused made by the trial court under the judgment and order impugned for section 302 ipc is quashed, but he is convicted for an offence punishable under section 304 part-i ipc. ..... the police registered a case on basis of the information aforesaid, regular investigation was made, accused chamna @ samiya was charge sheeted, case committed to the court of sessions and a charge for commission of an offence under section 302 ipc was framed. ..... chamna @ samiya ran away in the forest while keeping the knife with him.3. ..... the offence, as such, comes within the ambit of provisions of section 304 part-i ipc.16. ..... , there is no dispute that the death of jalaram was a culpable homicide and being the recovered chhuri having the blood stained matching with the blood stains found on the clothes of deceased was the weapon of offence.12. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2015 (HC)

State Vs. Babla

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... public prosecutor submitted that the learned trial court fell in error in acquitting the accused-respondent from the offences charged inasmuch as, there is ample evidence available on record, which proves the charges against the accused beyond ..... forwarded by the learned magistrate to the police station, sayara, for investigation whereupon, on 19.6.12, an fir being no.120/12, was registered against the accused for offences under sections 376, 341, 323 ipc and investigation commenced.5. ..... the trial court framed the charges for the offences under sections 376, 342, 323, 506 ipc, which were read over and explained ..... to appeal no.257/15) 3 acquitted the accused-respondent of the charges for offences under sections 376, 342, 323, 506 ipc. ..... police filed charge sheet against the accused-babla for offences under sections 376, 342, 323, 506 ipc.6 ..... , aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 19.5.15 passed by the additional sessions judge (women atrocities cases), udaipur, in sessions case no.21/13 (cis no.687/14), acquitting the accused-respondent of the charges for the offences under sections 376, 342, 323, 506 ipc .3. ..... deposition of the prosecutrix (p.w.4), she was not forcibly taken away by the accused-babla to the forest rather, she followed him voluntarily. ..... consideration of the evidence on record, the finding arrived at by the trial court that it is not proved beyond reasonable doubt that the prosecutrix was below 16 years of age at the time of commission of offence, cannot be faulted with.12. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1951 (HC)

Pheli Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1952Raj158

..... the right of private defence of the body commences as soon as a reasonable apprehension of danger to the body arises from an attempt or threat to commit the offence, though the offence may not have been committed and it continues as long as such apprehension of danger to the body continues. ..... it extends even to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the assailant if the offence which occasions the exercise of the right be of any one of the descriptions mentioned in that section. ..... under section 97 of the indian penal code every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99 to defend his own body against any offence affecting the human body. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 23 1951 (HC)

Jagannath Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1952Raj153

..... of the girl or there were three slight bruises over the private parts of the girl is not only to prove that it was the accused who committed rape upon the girl.of course the offence with which the accusedwas charged was very serious and some suspicionmay be attached to him but suspicion cannot takeplace of legal evidence and the criminal court isopen to do its duty of giving the benefit ..... the question, however, is whether the evidence which has been produced by the prosecution is sufficient even for the offence under section 451 or 354 or for any other offence for which the accused can be convicted by the appellate court although he was not charged with it.the evidence for house trespass ..... to this the reply of the learned counsel for the appellant is that even if offence under sections 451 and 354 has been committed, there was no evidence which can ..... the learned government advocate had to concede that so far as the offence of rape is concerned term (sic) made out on the record is from the ..... the learned additional sessions judge, however, was satisfied that offence under both the sections was proved against the accused and consequently convicted and ..... basis of this that the learned government advocate himself had to concede that the offence under section 376 was not made out. ..... pana, the victim of the alleged offence who had to admit in cross-examination that she had stated in committing magistrate's court that whatever she had stated was at the instance of her father and that she did .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1951 (HC)

Balmukan and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1952Raj123

..... it was explained that that case merely amounted to this that where the charge for the substantive offence did not give proper notice to the accused of what he had to meet it would not be ..... it was not enough to frame a charge for the substantive offence without specifying the special circumstances which brought the case within the ..... it was held inthis case that the abetment of an offence is not a minor offence within the meaning of section 238; but a conviction for substantive offence could be changed into one for abetment, if the facts were such that the principles of sections 236and 237 might be applicable, and if no prejudice was ..... section 236 was explained in these words by their lordships:'a man may be convicted of an offence, although there has been no charge in respect of it, if the evidence is such as to establish ..... could be framed, namely, the commission of the principal offence, and the abetment, then by virtue of provisions of section 237, the accused may be convicted of the offence of the abetment though it was not charged separately against ..... high courts whether a person can be convicted of abetment on a charge of substantive offence; but the majority opinion is that this can be done under certain circumstances.19. ..... gave clear notice to the accused of the facts against him, and he could be charged under section 236 of the code of criminal procedure in the alternative for abetment of the offence, and, therefore, his conviction for abetment without a charge was correct.26. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1952 (HC)

Bodu Lal Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1952CriLJ1386

orderatma charan, j.c.1. heard the parties.2. the accused-applicant stands convicted under section 9 of central act i of 1878 and sentenced to undergo three months' r.i. and to pay a fine of rs. 200/- or in default of such, to undergo further r.i. for one month.3. the first point pressed in this revision on behalf of the accused-applicant is that the prosecution has failed to prove that the article recovered was 'opium' within the meaning of section 3 of the act. the article recovered has been seen by me, and is certainly nothing else but spontaneously coagulated juice of capsules of the poppy. in state v. kaptan singh 0043/1952 : air1952all118 , it has been observed as below:opium in the form of coagulated juice of poppy is so well known in this country being widely used for medicinal & other purposes that anyone can identify it and it is unnecessary to call in an expert to establish its identity. if an excise inspector says that certain article is crude opium his testimony cannot be looked upon as merely an opinion of an expert and is entitled to weight as evidence even if no reasons are given for the opinion.4. it has then been argued on behalf of the accused-applicant that the evidence on the record of the trial court does not justify the inference that the opium in question was recovered from the possession of the accused-applicant. the two courts below have clearly come to the concurrent findings on independent evidence and otherwise that the opium in question was .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //