Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: forest offence Court: mumbai Page 11 of about 25,540 results (0.036 seconds)

Wainganga Krishna GramIn Bank Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

..... i am of the view that since the first information report did not disclose the commission of any offence, it was not proper on the part of the police machinery to have undertaken the investigation into the matter. ..... before proceeding further, it would be appropriate to remind oneself of the ingredients of the offence of criminal breach of trust punishable under section 406 of the ipc, and its aggravated form made punishable under section 409 of the ipc. ..... the respondent no.3 herein has lodged a report, alleging commission of offences punishable under section 406 of the ipc, 409 of the ipc read with section 34 of the ipc by the applicant bank and its officers, with the velapur police station. ..... the question is whether on the aforesaid allegations levelled in the fir, prima facie, the offences in question, or any other cognizable offence can be said to have been committed. 9. ..... this was treated as the first informant report and a case in respect of the aforesaid offences has been registered at the said police station. ..... in my view, though the applicant bank may be civilly liable to pay damages to the first informant, no commission of the alleged offences, or any other cognizable offence is disclosed from the fir. ..... the contention of the applicant bank is that,on a reading of the first information report, no criminal offence is disclosed against the bank or its officers. 5. ..... in the circumstances, since no cognizable offence is prima facie disclosed, the application needs to be allowed. .....

Madankumar Dharamchand JaIn and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1983(1)BomCR416

..... complaint, the learned magistrate issued process and it appears that at some stage by a consent of the parties, the charges in respect of the offence under the indian penal code were dropped and the trial was confined to the offences under section 78 and section 79 of the trade and merchandise marks act and section 63 of the copyright act. ..... 247 of 1979, by which the learned appellate judge confirmed the conviction and sentence passed against the petitioners for the offence under sections 78 and 79 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958 and section 63 of the copyright act ..... have used similar mark on carton and socks and thus they have infringed the goods of the second respondent, and therefore, they are liable for the offences punishable under sections 78 and 79 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958. ..... and sentence recorded by the courts below is set aside and the petitioners are acquitted of the offences with which they were charged.fine, if paid, be refunded to them. ..... 18/1&r;/1977 charging four accused made therein for the commission of offences under sections 78 and 79 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958, section 63 of the copyright act, 1957 read with section 34 of the indian penal code and sections 120, 120-b, 465, 471, 472 ..... charging the petitioners along with other accused, with the commission of offence under sections 78 and 79 of the trade and merchandise marks act, 1958, section 63 of the copyright act, and also the offences under the indian penal code. 7. .....

Shaikh Zakir Shaikh Nasir, Age 38 Years. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... interim custody of the animal be given to the owner who is facing prosecution or to the pinjrapole, the following factors will be relevant : (1) the nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the owner ; (2) whether it is the first offence alleged or he has been found guilty of offences under the act earlier ; (3) if the owner is facing the first prosecution under the act, the animal is not liable to be seized, so the owner will have a ..... petitioner herein, who is facing prosecution or to the respondent no.2, it must be taken into consideration that alleged offence is the first offence against the petitioner herein and therefore, the animals are not liable to be seized and the petitioner shall have better claim for the interim custody of the said ..... it also appears that the alleged charges levelled against the petitioner herein is the first offence and respondent no.1 has nowhere pointed out that there are any criminal antecedents against the petitioner herein, and ..... sindkheda police station has registered offence under cr no.19/2009 against the petitioner for offences under sections 11 (d) (e) (f) of prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 and under section 5 (1) 11 of maharashtra animal preservation act,1976 on 13.11.2009 and seized 29 bullocks from the custody of the petitioner ..... which he was carrying to his field at village sindkheda and at that time police personnel seized said animals, lodging the first information report against him for the offences stated therein. .....

Gulam HusaIn Khan Mustafa Khan, Age 42 Years, Vs. the State of Maharas ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... interim custody of the animal be given to the owner who is facing prosecution or to the pinjrapole, the following factors will be relevant : (1) the nature and gravity of the offence alleged against the owner ; (2) whether it is the first offence alleged or he has been found guilty of offences under the act earlier ; (3) if the owner is facing the first prosecution under the act, the animal is not liable to be seized, so the owner will have a ..... petitioner herein, who is facing prosecution or to the respondent no.2, it must be taken into consideration that alleged offence is the first offence against the petitioner herein and therefore, the animals are not liable to be seized and the petitioner shall have better claim for the custody of the said animals as ..... it also appears that the alleged charges levelled against the petitioner herein is the first offence and respondent no.1 has nowhere pointed out that there are any criminal antecedents against the petitioner herein, and ..... sindkheda police station has registered offence under cr no.18/2009 against the petitioner for offences under sections 11 (d) (e) (f) of the prevention of cruelty to animals act, 1960 and under section 5 (1) 11 of maharashtra animal preservation act, 1976 and seized 36 bullocks from the custody of the petitioner and ..... which he was carrying to his field at village sindkheda and at that time police personnel seized said animals, lodging the first information report against him for the offences stated therein. .....

Govind @ Dwarkadas Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the investigating officer is under obligation to register the offence if the first information discloses commission of a cognizable offence.apart from the afore said, the first information report clearly shows that the first informant has mentioned the name of the applicant as driver of the jeep.16. ..... 210 of 1997, by which the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 304a of the indian penal code and was directed to suffer simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of rs.2,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for 45 days, together with the ..... mh-22/8207 rashly and negligently caused death of sachin jadhav, aged about 3 years and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 304-a of the indian penal code.5. ..... the first information report was disclosing commission of a cognizable offence, therefore, the police station authorities at sailu, district parbhani registered a crime against the present applicant vide crime no.174 of 1997 for the ofence punishable under section 304a of the indian penal code.4. .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Sadanand Laxman Tawde and Another

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1987(1)BomCR656

..... here the offence was committed in february 1975, the trial court rendered its judgment in september 1976 and the state appeal has been pending in this court since 1977, for almost 10 years. ..... the next question is whether the second respondent should also be deemed to have committed the offence of murder by operation of s. 34, i.p.c. ..... (13) once these four elements are established by the prosecution (and, of course, the burden is on the prosecution throughout) the offence is murder under s. ..... the offence committed by the first respondent would thus amount to murder proper.15. .....

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Naresh Rajeshwarrao Patil and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 73 of 2014, by which anticipatory bail was granted by the learned trial court in favour of naresh patil for the offence punishable under section 420, 467, 468, 471, 201 of the indian penal code. ..... it is also not in dispute that previous offence was registered on the basis of the complaint lodged by the present first informant for the offence punishable under sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 201 of the indian penal code against the trustees of the trust including the present accused naresh patil vide crime no. ..... according to them, the offence is very serious and custodial presence of the accused was absolutely essential. .....

Emperor Vs. Mangal Naran

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR355

..... the accused in this case was found guilty of (1) kidnapping a girl in order to commit murder under section 364, indian penal code, and (2) having murdered the girl and so having committed an offence under section 302, indian penal code. ..... for the first offence he was sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, and for the second he was sentenced to transportation for life.2. .....

Mangal Naran Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1925Bom268; 87Ind.Cas.424

..... the accused in this case was found guilty of (1) kidnapping a girl in order to commit murder under section 364, indian penal code, and (2) having murdered the girl and so having committed an offence under section 302, indian penal code. ..... for the first offence he was sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, and for the second he was sentenced to transportation for life.2. .....

Ashok S/O Jiwanmal Gidwani and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(1)MhLj561

..... officer himself seizes any timber, sandalwood, firewood, charcoal or any other notified forest-produce, which is the property of the state government, or any such property is produced before an authorised officer and if he is satisfied that a forest-offence has been committed in respect of such forest property, such authorised officer may, whether or not a prosecution is instituted for the commission of such forest-offence, order confiscation of the property so seized together with all tools, boats, ..... under section 61-a if the owner of the tool, boat, vehicle or cattle proves to the satisfaction of the authorised officer that it was used in carrying the timber, sandalwood, firewood, charcoal or any other notified forest-produce without the knowledge or connivance of the owner himself, his agent, if any and the person in charge of the tool, boat, vehicle or cattle and that each of them had taken all reasonable and necessary ..... be disputed for the purpose of this petition that seizure of sandal wood in the vehicle belonging to the petitioners is sufficient to indicate that a forest-offence has been committed. ..... meshram has never been involved in any offence, muchless a forest-offence. ..... were caught and masters escaped that the salutary provision in the form of section 55 of the act had been introduced so that not only all produce in respect of which the offence has been committed may be seized and confiscated but also tools, boats, carts or cattle used in the commission of any such .....