Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... by this application, the applicants have sought quashing of the order dated 22.2.2012 issuing process against them for the offences punishable under sections 498-a, 406 and 417 read with section 34 of the indian penal code and also quashing of the complaint filed against them by ..... found that the afore stated allegations do not prima facie constitute any of the offences punishable under sections 498-a, 406 and 417 of the indian penal code. ..... learned counsel for the applicants, there is not even a whisper of allegations made against both these accused constituting essential ingredients of offences punishable under sections 498-a, 406 and 417 of the indian penal code. ..... made in paragraph 13, therefore, cannot be considered to be sufficient for prima facie constituting offence punishable under section 498-a of the indian penal code. ..... that the allegations made against both the applicants, as can be seen from the paragraphs 4, 13 and 14 in the complaint are sufficient to indicate that prima facie case for the alleged offences has been made out against both the applicants. 6. ..... cruelty, must specify the allegations in the complaint so as to enable the other side to meet them appropriately and also enable the court to decide, as to whether or not these allegations really constitute in law the offence of cruelty, which is not the case here. ..... of statement that false and baseless allegations have been made by one person against another, offence of cruelty is not prima facie constituted. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... as the respondent pleaded not guilty to the charge framed against him for offences punishable under sections 363, 366 and 376 of the indian penal code, he was tried by the first ad-hoc assistant sessions judge, amravati. ..... accordingly, the learned ad-hoc assistant sessions judge acquitted the respondent of all the offences with which he was charged by his judgment and order delivered on 23/8/2001. ..... the respondent was charged for offences punishable under sections 363, 366 and 376 of the indian penal code. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... , charge sheet came to be filed against the appellant for the offence punishable under sections 302 and 201 of i.p.c. ..... after this opinion, p.w.7 recorded offence against manoj meshram vide crime no. ..... 4 of 2010, holding him guilty of an offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rs.3,000/or in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. 2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... this criminal appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 10/12.8.2004 passed by the special judge, chandrapur in special case no.13/1994 by which appellant/accused is convicted for the offence punishable under section 7 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of rs.300/- and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. ..... the appellant is also convicted for the offence under section 13(1)(d) punishable under section 13(2) of the said act and sentenced to suffer simple imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of rs.300/- and in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for one month. 2. ..... the appellant is acquitted of the offences punishable under sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988. ..... for the reasons stated above, the evidence on record does not establish the guilt of the accused for the offence for which he was charged. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... by a judgment and order dated 28.7.1999, the appellants came to be convicted for the offence as charged and have been sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of rs.1,000/- and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years. ..... the appellants were prosecuted for the offence punishable under section 302 r/w 34 of the indian penal code in sessions case no.78/1994 on the file of the learned additional sessions judge, achalpur. ..... the appellants are acquitted of the offence as charged. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 87/1998, holding him guilty for the offence punishable under section 302 of indian penal code and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for life with fine of rs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... the land dispute between two families is the root cause and as such, the trial court ought not to have proceeded to acquit any accused of the offence punishable under section 302 indian penal code as charged. ..... all 6 accused have also been acquitted of offence under section 135 of the bombay police act. ..... accused no.2 nilkanth alone is convicted of offence under section 304 part one, and sentenced to suffer ri for 10 years, to pay fine of rs. ..... 6 dindayal of offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of indian penal code. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
oral judgment: (b.r. gavai, j.). 1. the petitioner which is a public limited company has approached this court, in effect for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to pay interest on the amount of rs.49,40,923/- as provided under section 244a of the income tax act (hereinafter referred to as the act ?). the petitioner has also prayed for quashing and setting aside the communication dated 18.7.1995 issued by the central board of direct taxes to the chief commissioner of income tax, pune. 2. the facts in the present case are not in dispute. the petitioner is a steel manufacturing company. the petitioner when it was in the process of establishing an integrated steel plant at bhandara entered into an agreement with m/s. mannesmann demag (mdh) germany (hereinafter referred to as the german company ?) on 8.11.1985 for transfer of technical knowhow. as per the said agreement, the petitioner company was required to make the payment of technical knowhow fee in three instalments of rs.25,48,333/- dm, totalling to rs.76,45,000/-. 3. that the petitioner company in pursuance to the said agreement deducted tax at source (tds) and paid/deposited the same with respondent as detailed below : amount paid to mdh (germany) in d.m.tds in rs.date of payment of tds.254833327,72,600.0029.03.1986.---------1,48,126.0022.05.1986254833336,56,000.0016.12.198710,666.0011.08.198853,70,567.0026.05.1990 rs.53,70,567/- for the third and final instalment and deposited the same in advance with the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 107/2010, thereby convicting the appellant/accused for the offences punishable under sections 302 and 201 of the indian penal code and sentencing to suffer life imprisonment along with fine of rs.10,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months the offence punishable under section 302 of ipc and to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years along with fine of rs.10,000/- in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months for the ..... thus, in our opinion, this circumstance is not sufficient enough to establish the guilt of the accused in commission of a serious offence under section 302 of the indian penal code. 12. ..... the accused was charged for the offences punishable under sections 302, 201, 379, 376 read with sections 511, 403, 506 of the indian penal code and under section 3(2)(v) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act. ..... the appellant/accused has been acquitted of the other offences viz. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Nagpur
..... 8/2011 by which the appellant is convicted for the offence punishable under section 307 of the ipc and is directed to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of rs.2,000/-, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three moths. 2. ..... on 15.09.2011, below exh.5, charge was framed against the appellant for the offence punishable under section 307 of the ipc. ..... panjabrao madavi (pw9) registered an offence under section 307 of the indian penal code. .....
Tag this Judgment!