Court : Madhya Pradesh
m.cr.c.no.3348/2013 22.3.2013 shri s.k.dixit, advocate for the applicant. shri r.k.kesarwani, pl for the state. this is the firs.bail application filed by the applicant under section 439 of the cr.p.c.for grant of bail. the applicant is in custody since 29.1.2013 in connection with crime no./p.o.r.no.527/08 registered at p.s.forest circle, madiyadon, district damoh for the offence punishable under sections 9, 39, 50, 51 of the wild life protection act. learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. all the offences are triable by the magistrate. the applicant is in custody and trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore, he be released on bail. learned counsel for state has opposed the application. on due consideration of the contention raised by the learned counsel for the parties and overall facts and circumstances of the case, i am of the considered view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, the application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in a sum of rs.25,000/- (rs.twenty five thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court for securing his presence before the said court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during trial. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge pb
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
m.cr.c.no.2510/2013 2.4.2013 shri pradeep naveriya, counsel for the applicant(s).shri a.k. singh, pl, for the respondent/state. heard. the applicants are in custody since 16.2.2013 in connection with por no.21038/19 registered at p.s. forest range katangi, district balaghat for the offence punishable under sections 16, 18, 31, 32 of section 2 and u/s 9, 44, 51of wild life protection act. learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. the offence levelled against the applicants are triable by magistrate. charge sheet has already been filed and trial would take considerable time to conclude finally, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicants. learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer. on due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicants. the application is allowed. it is directed that applicants shall be released on bail on their each furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/ (rupees twenty five thousand) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the committal court/trial court concerned, for their appearance before the said court and on all such other dates as given in this regard by the said court during trial. c.c. as per rules. (g.s.solanki) ravi judge
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... /por no.18953/09 registered by forest range officer, jaitpur, district shahdol for the offences punishable under sections 5, 9, 39, 50, 51 of the wild life protection act, 1972. ..... all the offences are triable by the magistrate. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
m.cr.c.no.12901 o 25. 03.13 shri akhilesh jain, counsel for the applicant. on behalf of the applicant/accused, this petition is preferred under section 482 of the cr.p.c for quashment of the forest crime (por) no.23635/17 registered on 15.1.2010 for the offence of section 9,39,44,50 read with section 51 of the wild live protection act,1972. as alleged, some skin of the wild animal was found in possession of the applicant in his vehicle, on which, the impugned crime was registered. in the cours.of the arguments on admission, in response of some query of the court, instead to argue further, applicant's counsel seeks permission to withdraw this petition as not pressed with liberty to raise all the objections and grounds stated in the petition at the appropriate stage of the trial in defense of the applicant. considering such prayer the petition is hereby dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. (u.c.maheshwari) judge mkl
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... the applicants have been arrested on 31/08/2012 in connection with forest crime pro no.18953/2008 registered by foresh department, range office-jaitpur, district shahdol (mp) and after filing the challan criminal case no.1671/2012 has been registered in the court of c.j.m.shahdol (m.p. ..... ) for the offence punishable under sections 5, 9, 29, 50 & 51 of wild wife (protection) act, 1972. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... ) being aggrieved with the judgment dated 18/07/2012 passed by the sessions judge, east nimar, district- khandwa, in sessions trial no.193/2011, whereby respondent has been acquitted of the offence punishable under section 302 of the indian penal code ( ipc . ..... for short).prosecution case, in brief, is that on 07/08/2011, the respondent had committed murder of his wife and her dead body was found in the saatkhuta forest near village jhirpa. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... the applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with p.o.r.no.11067/06 registered at forest region, west general, lanji for the offence punishable under sections 2(20).9, 39(b).49-b(iv).50, 51, 52 of the wild life protection act. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... by the special sessions judge (under the scheduled castes and the scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, 1989 (for short the act )).tikamgarh in sessions trial no.26/2011, whereby respondent has been acquitted of the offences punishable under section 376 of the indian penal code (for short, 'the act') and section 3(2)(5) of the act. ..... prosecution case, in brief, is that on 23/5/11 at about 12 noon, near the nursery of forest department at village nadiya, respondent subjected the prosecutrix, a married lady aged about 32 years and a member of scheduled tribe, to rape. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2000(4)MPHT437
..... in this appeal it has been argued that there is no definite proof that the appellant( caused injuries to simon tigga and the offence, if any, is covered by section 323 and not section 307, ipc.5. ..... the offence fell under section 307 and not under section 326, ipc.13. ..... the trial court after appreciation of the evidence on record held the accused guilty for the aforesaid offence.4. ..... he ran away from the indoor ward of the hospital on 29-4-1994 and his bones were found in the forest. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
crr no.1282/1999 criminal revision no.1282/1999 13.3.2013 none for the applicant. shri prakash gupta, panel lawyer for the state/respondent. it appears that no one is appearing on behalf of the applicant since long to argue the matter. the applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under section 3 of m.p.vanopaj parivahan gaman rules, 1961 read with section 42 of the forest act and sentenced for 2 months and 17 days with a fine of rs.500/-, whereas the sentenced has already undergone by the applicant and fine was deposited before the trial court. after considering the evidence adduced against the applicant and the judgments passed by both the courts below, i am of the view that appreciation of evidence was done by the trial court as well as by the appellate court in a proper manner. there is no basis by which any interference can be done in the conviction directed by the learned cjm, seoni. so far as the sentence is concerned, it is already executed. under such circumstances, the revision filed by the applicant is hereby dismissed. crr no.1282/1999 a copy of the order be sent to the trial court as well as to the appellate court for information. (n.k.gupta) judge pushpendra
Tag this Judgment!