Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-05-1989
Reported in : (1990)1GLR384
..... respectful agreement with the principles laid down in the decisions of the madras, karnataka and punjab & haryana high courts. 16. the food corporation of india was set up under the food corporation act, 1964. it can without incurring the liability of employing workmen where work is of an intermittent nature, employ a contractor for supply of ..... labour or for handling certain works of the corporation. without in any way reflecting upon the bona fides of a public sector corporation to engage a ..... conditions of service and scales of pay of the officers and employees of a food corporation other than the secretary of the food corporation of india. 17. from the perusal of the scheme of the act, it is evident that the food corporation of india is an instrumentality of the state comprehended in the expression 'other authority .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : May-02-1989
Reported in : 1990CriLJ518; (1989)2GLR443
..... sc 815 : (1971 cri lj 690), while considering the provisions of the food adulteration act and the essential commodities act, observed that the control of production and distribution of essential commodities may to the extent from a border ..... permissible under section 3(1) of the act.'mr. shah in vain tried to distinguish the said observations and submitted that the supreme court was dealing with the food articles, but it is clear that the central government has the authority to control the quality of the essential commodity.8. the supreme court in municipal corporation of delhi v. shiv shanker, air 1971 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-27-1989
Reported in : AIR1990Guj105; [1992]73CompCas209(Guj); (1985)1GLR57; (1990)1GLR628; (1990)1GLR628
..... conclusions, we are, therefore, of the opinion that there is no merit in the challenge by the petitioner to the constitutional validity of section 29(1)of the state financial corporations act on the ground of articles 14, 19, 21 and 300a of the constitution. 51. as regards the individual facts of each petition, it is to be noted that it ..... a reasonable and prudent person as if the properties were its own and try to fetch the maximum price. 28. if in any of these acts, the authority of the corporation goes wrong or the corporation acts illegally that action may be open to challenge before and after such action, in a court of law and the aggrieved person is not without any ..... concerned, the duty is not so much to act judicially as to act fairly. see for instance, the observations of lord parker in h. k. (an infant), in re [1967] 2 qb 617. it only means that such measure of natural justice should be applied as was described by lord reid in ridge v. baldwin [1964] ac 40 (hl) as 'insusceptible' of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-20-1989
Reported in : (1990)1GLR301
..... defendant to get the benefit of the arbitration agreement. for that purpose mr. raval has placed reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in the case of food corporation of india and anr. v. yadav engineer and contractor air 1982 sc 1302. in the said case the learned advocate on behalf of the second defendant prayed for ..... filing written statement, then there is no question of any exercise of discretion by the trial court discretion with regard to stay under section 34 of the arbitration act is to be exercised only when an application under that section is otherwise competent....9. in the present case the question of interfering with the discretion of the ..... govt. counsel in applying for time to file the written statement amounted to taking a step in the proceedings within the meaning of section 34 of the arbitration act and sets aside the order of the trial court and rejected the request for stay of proceedings. the supreme court while rejecting the appeal observed that 'taking other .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-12-1989
Reported in : (1990)84CTR(Guj)232; [1990]184ITR376(Guj)
..... even against respondent no. 7. this submission cannot be accepted. prima facie, we are of the opinion that the petition against respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, is not maintainable in this high court. 4. learned counsel for the petitioners has relied upon a decision of this high court in m. d. juvekar ..... the petitioners have challenged the vires of sections 44ac and 206c of the income-tax act, 1961 (for short 'the act'), as inserted by the finance act, 1988. an incidental prayer in the petition is to restrain respondent no. 7, orissa forest corporation limited, from recovering the amount of income-tax pursuant to the provisions contained in ..... v. modern bakeries (india) ltd. : (1988)illj433guj and another decision of this high court in modern food industries (india ltd. v. m. d. juvekar 0043/1988 : (1988)iillj534guj . the earlier decision was carried in letters patent appeal which is reported in a subsequent decision .....
Tag this Judgment!