Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Aug-05-1969
Reported in : AIR1970Guj235; 1970CriLJ1475
..... a chemist. but, it clearly appears that vaghela was at the relevant time a chemist in the esrvice or pay of the municipal corporation and was entrusted with the performance of a public duty, namely, to receive the samples for analysis, to compare the seal etc., ..... read with section 7 of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 (37 of 1954) for the accused having on the morning of december 31, 1965 at 9.30 a.m. sold to the complainant food inspector of the ahmedabad municipal corporation 700 m litre of cow's milk for ..... of weights and measures and is only as regards the proportion to be used and is made by gsr 74 dated 31st december 1964. it follows that the old quantity of one ounce has been equated with 215 ml or 25 grams. but as regards the ..... come up for consideration before raju, j. in state of gujarat v. shantaben, air 1964 guj 136, wherein the learned judge has, on a consideration of the scheme of the act and the rules observed at p. 139 of the report:'these rules are framed in order .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-10-1969
Reported in : AIR1971Guj20; 1971CriLJ368
..... counsel for the petitioner was that there could be no general authorisation by the local authority prior to amendment of section 20 of the act by section 11 of the prevention of food adulteration (amendment) act, 1964 (no. 49 of 1964). it was in context of the consideration of that position, the following observations were made in para 13, at page 201:'it seems me ..... the contention that the complaint was filed by an unauthorised person, it will be noticed that shri nirmal kumar jain was authorised under section 20 of the act, through a resolution of the municipal corporation (no. 973 dated 10-2-1961). a copy of that resolution, exhibit pk, is on the record of the trial court. the resolution shows that the recommendations .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Nov-13-1969
Reported in : (1971)12GLR213
..... hence we shall dispose of them by this common judgment.2. in criminal revision application no. 293 of 1969, the facts are that the food inspector of surat municipal corporation visited the shop of the petitioner and seized bottles containing material described as 'kashmir madhu'. the seizure of the bottles was made in the ..... the bottles did not contain 'honey'. the petitioner was thus selling the bottles in contravention of rule 45 of the rules made under the prevention of food adulteration act. the food inspector then filed an application no. 1 of 1968 in the court of the judicial magistrate, first class, (municipality), surat producing the bottles which ..... made by the food inspectors seeking appropriate orders in respect of the articles seized by them cannot amount to a prosecution for an offence and no previous written consent is necessary under the provisions of section 20 of the act. reliance was placed on the decision in abdoola haroon and co. v. corporation of calcutta : air1950cal36 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jul-04-1969
Reported in : (1970)11GLR558
..... that the petitioners will have to take proceedings according to law. we can only declare that sub-section (2) of section 152 a of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 does not stand in the way of the petitioners to enforce their right to refund as directed by the supreme court. in view of the decision we ..... sub-rules (2) and (3) of rule 7 of the taxation rules contained in chapter viii of schedule 'a' to the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949 (hereafter referred to as 'the act') all specified plant and machinery contained or situated in or upon the mills' buildings and lands were deemed to form part of such buildings and ..... respect of their premises for the official years 1963-64, 1964-65 and 1965-66 on the proper reading of section 152a read with the other provisions of the act and particularly rule 2ib. they also contend that sub-section (2) of section 152a does not authorise the corporation to retain the amount of tax illegally recovered, particularly in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Apr-01-1969
Reported in : (1970)11GLR628; (1970)IILLJ716Guj
..... arguments, it must be stated in fairness to him that when it was pointed out to him that under s. 13 of the indian trade unions act, 1926, every registered trade union is a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal and s. 26 provides that the change in the name of a registered trade union shall not affect any ..... in the internal management of the trade union. if there is any irregularity in the making of the alterations in the rules, it is for the trade union as a corporate body to complain about it and no individual member of the trade union, much less a third party, can be heard to say that the alterations are invalid because of ..... v. national union of seamen [1929] 2 ch. 58 and edwards and another v. haliwall and another (1950) 2 all. e.r. 1964, where it has been held applicable also in the case of trade unions which are corporate bodies under the statutes creating them. it would therefore appear that no real difficulty or hardship is caused by taking the view that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Dec-18-1969
Reported in : [1971]41CompCas352(Guj)
..... very great importance as such cases would clearly be covered by reason of the oppressive conduct or mismanagement under section 397 of section 398. in rajakmundry electric supply corporation ltd. v. nageswara rao, their lordships settled the legal question that the words 'just and equitable' are not to be construed ejusdem generis with the matters ..... vapi project which is admitted even by the petitioners to be of national importance. the profits of the company have been increased from rs. 11 lakhs in 1964 to about rs. 17 lakhs even after providing for taxation provision. the sales of the company have gone up from about rs. 1 crore 5 lakhs rs ..... , secondly, there must be exclusion from management, thirdly, there should be exclusion from any benefit as shareholder, fourthly, there must be persistent, illegal and wrongful acts for long continuous period. in such a structure of domestic disharmony it is often said that no redress is possible except by destruction of the structure itself. that .....
Tag this Judgment!