Court : Gujarat
Decided on : May-05-1967
Reported in : AIR1968Guj80
..... of the ahmedabad municipal corporation. having come to know that the first opponent was carrying on the business of storing and selling 'papad' an article of food prepared from 'adad-dal' flour without obtaining the necessary sanction, filed a compliant for the offence punishable under section 16(1)(a)(ii) of the act. the opponent no. 1 who is the ..... at the stage of previous publication and the state of gujarat for other stages. in the decision of sidhpur electric industrial co. ltd. v. state of gujarat, ilr (1964) 5 guj 647, this court had a similar situation to tackle. in the said case, question of application of section 89 of the bombay reorganisation ..... was whether the licence in favour of the sidhpur electric company granted by the state of baroda under the baroda electricity act of samvat year 1964 did or did not become a licence within the meaning of the indian electricity act 1910 after the merger of baroda state. the contention on behalf of the sidhpur electricity co. was that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-16-1967
Reported in : AIR1968Guj88; (1967)8GLR588
..... authority would not accord sanction if sharma was not a duly appointed food inspector. the fact that the medical officer of health of the ahmedabad municipal corporation is the sanctioning authority has not been challenged in the cross-examination of sharma in his has deposed ..... is evidence to indicate that sharma is a duly appointed food inspector. in the complaint exh. 1 he has described himself as the food inspector. the complaint is endorsed by the sanctioning authority namely the medical officer of health of the ahmedabad municipal corporation. it is not unreasonable to assume that the sanctioning ..... food inspector could be prosecuted for an offence under section 19(9) of the act. therefore, these provisions provide for a built-in guarantee against tampering between the taking of the sample and its analysis by the public analyst. mr. thakore argues that a similar argument was advanced before mehta j in criminal appeal nos. 467 and 581 of 1964 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-24-1967
Reported in : 1968CriLJ829; (1967)GLR768
..... for on that depends the decision of the case, inasmuch the report then remained supersedes the report of the public analyst under the act.3. it was, however, urged by mr. desai by reference to a case of municipal corporation of delhi v. ghisa ram. criminal appeal no. 194 of 1966, d/- 28.11.1966 reported in : 1967crilj939 , that as ..... be any justification to order him to produce the sample bottle and allow him to suffer without having the third sample bottle being sent to the director of the central food laboratory. the learned magistrate also appears to think that since the accused denies to have sold any such vegetable oil, he is no longer an accused-vendor and ..... of ma analysis in respect thereof. now it appears obvious that the legislature has clearly intended to have one - additional sample made out from any such food-item purchased by the complainant under the act and it has to be retained by the complainant. that retention is for a purpose-viz., that if a complaint is to be lodged, he .....
Tag this Judgment!