Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... the vehicle had infact been sold to dilprit singh but its ownership was not transferred as the whole consideration had not been paid by the buyer, while the liability of the seller to pay the financier was still continuing. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
..... as regards the judgments of the apex court cited by the learned counsel for the petitioner/op, there is no dispute regarding the general preposition that hirer/financier of a vehicle obtain on a higher purchase basis by another person has the right to repossess the vehicle for default in payment by the purchaser. ..... appeal against the district forums order to the delhi state consumer disputes redressal commission, delhi (in short, the state commission) was dismissed by the latter by its order of 08.12.2006, with some additional general directions to financiers of such goods. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent /complainant before the district forum are : that the respondent/complainant purchased a tractor bearing registration no.c.g.13-d-9576 on 30.04.2011 with the help of financier mahindra finance. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
..... 4,60,000/- was paid by the insurer to the financier and sum of rs. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... satya deo tripathi, air 1979 sc 850, has categorically held that under the hire purchase agreement, the financier is real owner of the vehicle, therefore, there cannot be any allegation against him for having the possession of the vehicle. ..... looking to the documents filed by both the parties, it appears that the vehicle in question was purchased by the respondent/complainant after obtaining financial assistance from the appellant/o.p. ..... state consumer disputes redressal commission, shimla in the case of mahindra and mahindra financial services ltd. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad
..... brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that, the opponent mahindra and mahindra financial services limited is a finance company. ..... if agreements permit the financier to take possession of the financed vehicles, there is no legal impediment on such possession being taken. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur
..... satya deo tripathi, air 1979 sc 850, has categorically held that under the hire purchase agreement, the financier is real owner of the vehicle, therefore, there cannot be any allegation against him for having the possession of the vehicle. ..... the complainant/appellant purchased the said vehicle with the help of financial assistance by obtaining loan from the o.p. ..... looking to the documents filed by both the parties, it appears that the vehicle in question was purchased by the appellant/complainant after obtaining financial assistance from the o.p. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC UT Chandigarh
..... it was further stated that in january 2010, a sum of rs.13.20 lacs was paid by the financier (hdfc) to opposite party no.1 and, as such, a total sum of rs.23.10 lacs stood paid on behalf of the complainants to it. 2. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... it is also contended that the complainant is the owner of the vehicle and the financier is andhra pragathi grameena bank, peddamanthur who are the competent persons to file a petition for release of the alleged tractor before the concerned authorities who seized the vehicle but the burden was thrown ..... due to the acts of the opposite parties the complainant suffered financially and mentally. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
..... [9] the respondents further argued that samaf, a separate legal entity from khula albeit also a financier of small business enterprises under the auspices of the department of trade and industry, should not have lent and advanced moneys to vusisizwe retailer development (pty) ltd, a company, of which zulu and kok were directors, in ..... all of this occurred when khula had lent and advanced substantial amounts of money to amavulandlela, thus placing khulas financial interests in jeopardy. ..... this it did despite the fact that it had no authority to do so, especially since the amount of r4 173 299.26 was not due and payable by amavulandlela, and its conduct placed amavulandlela in dire financial straits. .....
Tag this Judgment!