Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... (ncte) under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 23 of the right of children to free and compulsory education act, 2009 (central act no.35 of 2009) from time to time. level-(ii)classes vi to viii qualifications as laid down by national council for teacher education (ncte) under the provisions of sub-section ( ..... under the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 23 of the right of children to fee and comp- pulsory education act,2009 (central act no.35 of 2009) from time to time. level-(ii) classes vi to viii qualifications as laid down down by national council for teacher education (ncte) under the provisions of sub- ..... of rajasthan & ors. (s.b.civil writ petition no.10339/12 ) & 89 connected matters. 23 namely, rajasthan panchayat act, 1953 and (ii) the panchayat samiti & zila parishad act, 1959 were repealed and replaced by rajasthan panchayati raj act, 1994 ( for short the act of 1994 .) .21. section 89 of the act of 1994 provides for constitution of rajasthan panchayat samiti & .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... of the present case. fourthly and in any case, the rule is procedural in nature and cannot control the substantive provision of section 11-b(1) of the act. indisputably, no specific form of protest has been provided in the rules. the simple and ordinary meaning of the expression protest is: to express or record dissent or objection . ..... tribunal was right in rejecting the assessee s refund claim as time-barred. both the questions are, obviously, inter-related and the answer to question no.1 depends on the answer to question no.2. appropriate it would be to take note of the contents of the two letters.said to be of lodging of protest by the applicant- assessee ..... thereafter, on 25.06.1998, the assessee lodged the claim, per section 11-b(2) of the act, for refund of the amount paid towards additional value included in the assessable value of goods cleared. the deputy commissioner central excise, under order-in- original no.55-refund/99 dated 18.11.1999, rejected the claim so made by the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... for being a co.operative society engaged in the business of banking and providing credit facilities. it was by virtue of insertion of sub- section (4) by finance act, 2006 with effect from 01.04.2007 that the provisions of section 80p were made inapplicable in relation to any co-operative bank other than the primary agriculture ..... of banking and providing credit facilities to its members and public in general. the assessee had earlier been claiming, and was being allowed, deduction under section 80p(2) of the act for being eligible therefor. the assessee also claimed the similar deduction for the assessment year 2007-08, which has not been allowed by the assessing officer [ ..... law worth consideration. the assessee is a co-operative bank and had been entitled to the deduction under section 80p(2) of the act before the year in question and had been allowed such deduction. it is no doubt true that in the original return for the year in question, the assessee claimed deduction of rs.50,000/- .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... however, learned senior counsel, shri ram jethmalani, was allowed to commence his arguments. the arguments were heard at length and the matter was adjourned to 18.09.2013 as [2].requested by the state to enable them to produce the case-diary, on which date, the learned counsel for the state concluded his arguments. however, learned senior counsel requested ..... of the cr.p.c.attains importance in view of the provision of section 114a of the indian evidence act, 1872. hon'ble the apex court in the case of mohan lal & anr. versus state of punjab (criminal appeal nos.878-879 of 2011).decided on 11.4.2013 observed as under: the evidence of a victim of sexual ..... falls within the definition of 'penetrative sexual assault' provided under [ 15 ].section 3a of the chapter-ii of the protection of children from sexual offences act, 2012 as well as the definition of 'rape' provided in section 375(a) under the amended act of 2013. the next argument that the prosecutrix was not a minor, too, is not borne out .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... court for directions. the operative portion of the order dated 19.11.2010 passed by the assistant commissioner in proceedings under section 38 of the act reads as under:- f. : , 01 02 38 ( ) 38 ( ) " $ ' 40 (2) ( ) 40 (2) ( ) * " $ * /$ / 3 5 * " $ 15 * $ " in pursuance of the directions dated 19.11.2010, three applications were filed ..... a direction was necessary and in view of the fact that the applicants merely act in pursuance of the directions of the assistant commissioner, they apparently have no right to seek withdrawal/dismissal of the proceedings. the provisions of section 38(2) are a clear indicator of the above position, which provides that the assistant ..... public trust by the 2 name of 'shri gautam rishi trust meena samaj gyarah pargana, sirohi - pali jalore', kesarpura, shivganj ('the trust') is a public trust registered under the provisions of the act. it appears that one uma ram filed an application under section 23 of the act in prescribed form no.8 before the assistant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... court for directions. the operative portion of the order dated 19.11.2010 passed by the assistant commissioner in proceedings under section 38 of the act reads as under:- f. : , 01 02 38 ( ) 38 ( ) " $ ' 40 (2) ( ) 40 (2) ( ) * " $ * /$ / 3 5 * " $ 15 * $ " in pursuance of the directions dated 19.11.2010, three applications were filed ..... a direction was necessary and in view of the fact that the applicants merely act in pursuance of the directions of the assistant commissioner, they apparently have no right to seek withdrawal/dismissal of the proceedings. the provisions of section 38(2) are a clear indicator of the above position, which provides that the assistant ..... public trust by the 2 name of 'shri gautam rishi trust meena samaj gyarah pargana, sirohi - pali jalore', kesarpura, shivganj ('the trust') is a public trust registered under the provisions of the act. it appears that one uma ram filed an application under section 23 of the act in prescribed form no.8 before the assistant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... court for directions. the operative portion of the order dated 19.11.2010 passed by the assistant commissioner in proceedings under section 38 of the act reads as under:- f. : , 01 02 38 ( ) 38 ( ) " $ ' 40 (2) ( ) 40 (2) ( ) * " $ * /$ / 3 5 * " $ 15 * $ " in pursuance of the directions dated 19.11.2010, three applications were filed ..... a direction was necessary and in view of the fact that the applicants merely act in pursuance of the directions of the assistant commissioner, they apparently have no right to seek withdrawal/dismissal of the proceedings. the provisions of section 38(2) are a clear indicator of the above position, which provides that the assistant ..... public trust by the 2 name of 'shri gautam rishi trust meena samaj gyarah pargana, sirohi - pali jalore', kesarpura, shivganj ('the trust') is a public trust registered under the provisions of the act. it appears that one uma ram filed an application under section 23 of the act in prescribed form no.8 before the assistant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... was rejected by the hon'ble apex court vide its judgment dated 26.4.2010. they have averred further that they thereafter submitted a representation before the respondent no.2 requesting for conferment of third selection grade pursuant to the notification dt.25.1.1992 corresponding to the pay scale of rs.10000-15200 (subsequently revised to rs. ..... of rule 26a of the rsr, their claim for the third selection grade of rs.10000- 15200 with grade pay of rs.6600/-, is misconceived.5. the respondent no.2 in his reply has, at the outset, questioned the maintainability of the proceedings on the ground of multifariousness of facts and causes of action. they have contended as ..... thus affirm 23 that the appointment of a stamp reporter to the post of court master under the relevant rules is not a promotion and cannot thus be acted upon to be a third promotion for the lower division clerk/junior judicial assistant in the service of this court to determine their third selection grade under the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... the levy of land tax vide the demand notice dated 24.7.2009 (annex-10), under the provisions of rajasthan finance act, 2006 for assessment years 2009-10 raised by the assessing authority, (sub-registrar), bikaner.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent-assessing authority has not given reasonable opportunity of hearing and has issued ..... amount shall either be adjusted against the subsequent year, if by that time, fresh assessment order is framed and tax has become due for the subsequent year and if no such fresh assessment becomes due, the excess amount shall be refunded with interest @ 6% per annum. (mohammad rafiq), j. 5. learned counsel for the petitioners also ..... giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner-assessee, preferably within a period of six months from today. the petitioner shall deposit 30% s.b.c.w.p. no.11750/2009 vijay kumar sharma v/s state of rajasthan & anr. order dt:13. 109/2013 8/8 (thirty percent) of the impugned demand under the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... arising therein for decision to a bench of two judges; (c) a judge before whom any proceedings under the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882), the companies act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956). the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970) is pending, may with the sanction of the chief justice, obtain the assistance of one or more other ..... extraordinary original civil, testamentary or matrimonial jurisdiction including a proceeding under the indian trusts act, 1882 (act no. ii of 1882). the company act, 1956 (act no. i of 1956), the designs act, 1911 (act no. ii of 1911) or the patents act, 1970 (act no. 39 of 1970); (vi) a reference under section 243 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 (act not iii of 1955); (vii) a case or proceeding under section 30 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!