Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... e. the heirs and legal representatives of deceased hafizuddin; whereas respondent no.1 shaikh saleem sk. mehboob is the driver of offending vehicle matador, bearing registration no. mh20/a3638 and respondent no. 2, namely raosaheb kadam is the owner of the said matador. respondent no.3new india insurance company is the insurance company of the said ..... matador, however, respondent no.4 ravan is the ownercumdriver of the motor cycle and the ..... deceased was the pillion rider, to which the offending vehicle matador dashed, and respondent no.5 is the oriental insurance company i.e. the insurance company of the said motor cycle, bearing registration no. maa6425.2 the facts, which gave rise to the present appeal, can be briefly stated that on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... warrantcase" means a case relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years. therefore, on perusal of section 2(x), it is abundantly clear that any warrant case means a case relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment for life or imprisonment for a term ..... 2002 a notice was received by the complainant from the accused alleging offence u/sec. 138 of the negotiable instruments act. it was contended in that notice that cheque bearing no. 138399 was issued to the accused no. 1 and that cheque on its deposit was bounced. it was contended in the notice that the complainant had ..... challenging judgment and order dated 16th november, 2009 passed by the 6th judicial magistrate first class, ahmednagar discharging the accused i. e. respondent herein in summons case.2. brief facts of the case as disclosed in the appeal are as under :the appellant herein filed private complaint alleging offence punishable u/sec. 403, 423 and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... .m. from mahur in kinwat taluka. shaihin now deceased was eldest daughter of shaikh ainu. her marriage was solemnized with one mr. abdul aziz i. e. original accused no. 2 on 12th april, 1996. in the marriage a golden ring of 5 gms, certain utensils, furniture and a cash amount of rs. 5,000/ for purchasing garments were ..... is invoked in that case ingredients of section 34 are required to be met. on reading the evidence of p.w. 1 it does appear that no any specific act or overt act is attributed to each of the accused about harassment or illtreatment given by them to the deceased shaheen. the prosecution has not brought on record any ..... of the offence and the accused must have participated int he said meeting intending to commit the offence, all the accused must have participated in the crime and criminal act must have been committed in furtherance of their common intention. therefore, the learned senior counsel would submit that none of these ingredients are proved by the prosecution. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... said sayyadbin salem chaus. it has been stated by the legal heirs in the document of g.p.a. given in favour of shaikh ibrahim in para no.2, that there is no entry in their name in revenue record. 43. it has come on record that the police have investigated into the matter, one of the co- accused ..... the complainant purchased 02 acres 20 guntha land through 20 sale deeds. it is the submission of the learned counsel for the complainant that, as per the availability of finance he has purchased said land through 20 sale deeds. learned counsel submitted that, he has paid around rs. 1,34,50,000/- to sandu towards consideration. the learned ..... standing committee on 6.12.2010 and his intention is to protect the property of the government i.e. aurangabad municipal corporation. according to him, due to illegal acts of one sandu dhondiba dube and the complainant, he had filed several complaints / applications to several government authorities to take appropriate action against them. it is his contention .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... alienate the property with the prior permission of the bank authorities, as the property was mortgaged with the bank. a bare reading of section 47(2) of the mcs act indicates that no property, which is subject of the charge under earlier sub-section, shall be transferred in any manner without the previous permission of the society and ..... for the purpose of sub-section (1) to the assets created by a member out of the funds in respect of which the government has a claim.(2) no property or interest in property, which is subject to charge under the foregoing sub-section, shall be transferred in any manner without the previous permission of the ..... of sale transaction between them. therefore, according to the plaintiff, the sale is void, in view of section 47(2) and (3) of the maharashtra cooperative societies, act, 1960 ("mcs act" for short). moreover, according to the plaintiff, no title has been passed in favour of the defendant in respect of the suit land and, therefore, possession of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... the petition was allowed to be amended. the petitioner in para 24-a states that after the writ petition was filed, on 2-12-1995 the respondent no.8 had passed award under the proceedings initiated under land acquisition act and the compensation was determined for an amount of rs. 57,69,701/-. a copy of the award was annexed to the ..... that they had already requested for extension of further period from 1-10-1982. the company exercised its power under section 5(2) and 7(3) of the esso (acquisition of undertakings in india) act 1974. according to the petitioner, the respondent no.3 hpcl was successor in title of the esso company and as per the agreement of lease the respondent ..... in the matter of computing the period prescribed under clause (ii) of the first proviso to section 6(1).xxx xxx xxxxxx xxx xxx17. in the light of the law laid down by this court, we have no hesitation to hold that the declaration published under section 6 of the act was well within one year and the challenge to the same .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai Aurangabad
..... deserve to be quashed and set aside.12. learned a.p.p. for respondent nos.1 and 2 opposed present petition vehemently and submitted that impugned order dated 24.12.2009 was passed by respondent no.2, after following due procedure prescribed under the police act and after issuance of show cause notice to the petitioner. it is also submitted ..... on 29.9.2009. it also appears that after hearing petitioner's advocate, the respondent no.2 passed an order on 24.12.2009 under section 56(1) (a)(b) of bombay police act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as "the said act") and directed the petitioner not to enter in the boundaries of three districts namely ahmednagar, ..... the order dated 24.12.2009 passed by respondent no.2 discloses that two offences were registered against petitioner, i.e. c.r.no.i237/2006 and another c.r.no. 128/2007 under section 379 of the indian penal code and sections 3 and 15 of the environment (protection) act, 1986, pertaining to kopargaon police station, district ahmednagar .....
Tag this Judgment!