Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Page 10 of about 75,028 results (0.392 seconds)

D. Sesharani and Ors. Vs. Managing Director, A.P. Women's Co-op. Finan ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(2)ALT607

..... and as such, they are not being referred in this order. while the arguments are going on in the above writ petition the government thought it fit to amend act 2 of 1994 for giving effect to g.o.ms. no. 212, finance and planning (fw.pc.iii) department, dated 22-04-1994 and the present g.o.(p) 112 ..... by resorting to its legislative power.74. after this judgment, act 2 of 1994 was subjected to further amendment by act 27 of 1998 in august, 1998. subsequently, their lordships of the supreme court disposed of civil appeal nos. 82 and 83 of 1999 in rambabu and ors. v. secretary to government, finance and planning departments and ors. even at this belated stage, ..... the respondents did not bring to the notice of the supreme court the legislative changes that were brought in to act 2 of 1994 way back on 3-2-1998.75. government of .....

Director of Income-tax (Exemption) Vs. All India Personality Enhanceme ...

Court : Delhi

..... purposes by neglecting its basic object of running the institution." 62. it is also relevant to note that section 10(22) of the act was omitted by virtue of finance (no.2) act, 1998 w.e.f. 1st april, 1999, and the provisions to exempt income of universities and educational institutions existing solely for educational purposes ..... of any university or other educational institution, hospital or other medical institution which is wholly or substantially financed by government, under the new sub-clause (iiiab) and (iiiac) inserted in section 10(23c) of the income-tax act by the finance (no. 2) act, 1998. 8.3 further, under sub-clauses (iiiad) and (iiiae ) in section 10(23c ..... pointed out by the assessee, it was not claiming exemption under section 11 and 12 of the act but under section 10(22) of the act. section 10(22) of the act was omitted by virtue of the finance (no. 2) act, 1998 and the exemption available to a university or an educational institution existing solely for educational purposes .....

Gujarat State Khadi Gramodyog Board Vs. Gujarat State Khadi Gramodyog ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2005)1GLR24

..... is established in the year 1973 in the state of gujarat and has been receiving 100 % finance from the state government, under section 2(a) of the said act. therefore, it is clear that it is a statutory board, its creation is statutory and its creator is, respondent no.2- state of gujarat, having full and complete managerial and monitoring command.53. for the first ..... statutory one, it is under the direct control, authority and monitoring of the respondent no.2- state of gujarat.9. the statutory frame of the act, rules and regulations, the mechanism of the administration of the board, and the transactions and the dependence of the board for funds and finance for the administration of the board and its activity, it becomes quite unambiguous and .....

Reserve Bank of India, Bangalore Vs. Dhanalakshmi Funds (India) Ltd., ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas439(Mad)

..... , 35 and 36 of 1986 on his file. these revision petitions came before him under the following circumstances. 2. as per s. 45-s(1) of the reserve bank of india act, no. 2 of 1934, as it stands amended now, hereinafter referred to as the act, no person, being an individual or a firm or an unincorporated association of individuals shall, at any time, have ..... firm, excluding in either case depositors who are relatives of the individual or any of the partners. messrs. dhanalakshmi consolidates finance and industrial investments, 158 commander-in-chief road, madras 105, and asian integrated finance and industrial corporation, 95 mount road, madras 2 are two partnership firms, hereinafter referred to as the firms. on the belief entertained that those firms and few others .....

In Re: India Emerging Companies

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... .6.1 in view of the above findings, i, in exercise of the powers conferred upon me under section 19 of the securities and exchange board of india act, 1992, read with regulation 4(6) of sebi (substantial acquisition of shares and takeovers) regulations, 1997, hereby grant exemption to the acquirer, from complying with ..... the steps being taken in pursuing the legal cases instituted and co-operation would be extended to the authorities, as and when required and that there is no change contemplated in the control of the target company, including in the composition of the board of directors as a consequence of the proposed transaction.5.1 ..... chapter iii of takeover regulations with respect to the proposed indirect acquisition.2.1 in the application dated 16.3.2005, the acquirer had made the following submissions.2.2 the acquirer is a non-banking financial company established with the object of promoting and financing industrial enterprises and is registered with the reserve bank of india. the .....

Karnataka Food Packers Vs. Regional Director, Esi

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1990KAR4364

..... to provide for medical benefits and has to implement the scheme and cover the establishments, provided minimum facilities are available to discharge the obligations under the act. where, therefore, no such facilities are offered the demand is invalid. accordingly, it is submitted that the corporation was not justified in making a demand prior to the issuance ..... passed and the nature of the benefit which is intended to be conferred on them. chapter ii of the act deals with the corporation, standing committee and medical benefit council and their constitution; chapter iii deals with the problem of finance and audit; chapter iv make provisions for contribution both by the employees and the employer, and ..... in which it was held that in dealing with the scope of chapter va the element of quid pro quo was necessary.chapter va was introduced by amending act no. 53/1951. though as on today the provisions of that chapter do not apply since they cease to have effect from 1-7-1973, yet while deciding .....

Lok Adhikar Sangh Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2002)2GLR741

..... in its order dated 7.8.2000, the court has recorded the assurance given by then additional advocate general to the effect that without constraint of time and finance, fire safety measures shall be provided. state to report within 21 days about the fire safety measures in its buildings.(10). the state, amc and auda ..... remain in the buildings round the clock, were not provided with fire safety measures. assurance was given to the court that without the constraint of time and finance, fire safety measures shall be provided. till today, on behalf of the state, nothing is placed on record to indicate that in all government buildings either ..... per instructions issued by the state government and neglected to act in accordance with law. (as per report submitted by dr. manjula subramaniam, principal secretary, urban housing development) which makes it clear that no steps have been taken for non implementation of regulation 6.2. auda has not insisted for fire safety measures though mr. b.k. .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M.K. Raju Consultants (P.) Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1999]239ITR232(Mad)

..... initially provided for deduction of 60 per cent. of such fees received from abroad from the gross total income of the assessee for the relevant year. by the amending act of 1971 (finance (no. 2) act, 1971), the words 'whole of the income' were substituted in place of 60 per cent. after the assessment year with which we are now concerned, had come to an ..... total income' is defined as meaning the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of the act before making any deduction under chapter-vi-a or under section 80o of the act. by the finance (no. 2) act of 1980, sections 80aa and 80ab were introduced. section 80aa deals with the manner of computation of deduction under section 80m, while section 80ab deals with deductions .....

Jagjiwanrao Dayabhai and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1952CriLJ646

..... a charge and the procedure is not that of a warrant case unlike section 5 of the special criminal courts ordinance no. ii of 1942, and section 6(1) of the west bengal special courts act, 1950. the accused has thus only one right of cross-examination.15. the special judge is not required to record ..... constitutional limitation, upon the powers of the legislature otherwise conferred by the constitution. we have, therefore, to find whether the act is within the competence of the legislature. under list iii concurrent list, item no. 2, is criminal procedure including all matters included in the code of criminal procedure at the commencement of this constitution. the legislature ..... warrant cases by the magistrate.32. the learned government pleader contends that the terms of section 14 off the act are identical with those of section 5 of the special criminal courts ordinance, 1942 (no. ii of 1942), and the legality of the trials under the provisions of the ordinance was upheld in several decisions. .....

P. Ravinder Vs. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas275(AP); (2004)4CompLJ201(AP); [2004]49SCL43(AP)

..... .the total open position of the client was to the extent of rs. 42.70 lakhs as on july 9, 1996.with regard to another trading member 'param finance & securities ltd.,' it is stated:'the member had stated that the missing client informed that he would be doing only square off transactions with the member. hence the ..... share and stock broking services were m.k. securities and pennar patterson securities (wdm trading member).iv. in respect of two trading members with net buy position, namely param finance and arcadia share and stock brokers, the client was one and the same, namely v. prabhakar (net buy position of 1,90,000 shares). mr. v. prabhakar ..... of deposits.' (p. 655)15. in the light of these judgments, it is contended that respondent no. 1 being a recognized stock exchange is entitled to frame bye-laws under section 9 of securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956 and section 9(2)(k) empowers making of bye-laws as to the regulation of the entering into, making, performance, recession .....