Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: uttaranchal Page 11 of about 108 results (0.476 seconds)

Dharmanand S/O Late Mohananand, Vs. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttara ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... admitted on the next day i.e. 29.09.1999. this revision is received by transfer to this court under section 35 of the u.p. reorganization act, 2000 (central act no. 29 of 2000), for its disposal.5. learned counsel for the revisionists argued that the district magistrate is not empowered to pass any order under section 156(3 ..... to a magistrate shall be construed, unless the context otherwise requires,(i) in relation to an area outside a metropolitan area, as a reference to a judicial magistrate;(ii) in relation to a metropolitan area, as a reference to a metropolitan magistrate;analogous provision relating to the magistrate of second class and magistrate of first class are given ..... 29.04.1993, to which the three accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. on this prosecution got examined p.w. 1 bhuraj singh (complainant); p.w. 2 rajendra singh (relative of the complainant); p.w. 3 inder singh (tenant of the complainant); p.w. 4 constable balbir singh and p.w. 5 sub inspector janeshwar .....

Capt. V.N. Saxena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

..... court for fresh consideration, vide order dated 01.04.2008. on receipt after remand, it was re-numbered as writ petition (s/b) no. 78 of 2008. after the promulgation of the armed forces tribunal act, 2007, a petition assailing the proceedings of a summary court martial, and the order passed thereupon, would only lie to the armed forces tribunal ..... have been within the jurisdiction of the tribunal, if it had arisen after such establishment within the jurisdiction of such tribunal, stand transferred on that date to such tribunal.(2) where any suit, or other proceeding stands transferred from any court including a high court or other authority to the tribunal under sub-section (1),--(a) the court ..... proceed to deal with such suit, or other proceeding, so far as may be, in the same manner as in the case of an application made under sub-section (2) of section 14, from the stage which was reached before such transfer or from any earlier stage or de novo as the tribunal may deem fit.3. we are .....

Ram Lal Vs. Trilok Singh Chauhan

Court : Uttaranchal

..... filed any counter affidavit denying the contents of affidavit dated 15.02.2010 of the petitioner.6. by way of impugned order dated 10.03.2010 though the application paper no. 130c dated 15.02.2010 for recalling the order dated 22.01.2010 was allowed but a condition was imposed that by the date fixed i.e. 19.03.2010 ..... of rent. neither in the notice dated 07.09.2001 nor in the plaint respondent sought recovery of possession. the petitioner filed a written statement in the above scc suit no. 32/01 on 06.09.2002. in the written statement petitioner stated that he is a tenant since october 1994 @ rs. 250/- per month inclusive of all taxes. he was ..... courts in any part of india to which the said act does not extend exercising a corresponding jurisdiction that is to say-(a) so much of this schedule as relates to to -(i) suits excepted from the cognizance of a court small causes or the execution of decrees in such suits;(ii) the execution of decrees against immovable property or the interest .....

Shri Mangal Ram Vs. Smt. Samar Jahan

Court : Uttaranchal

..... court, managed to obtain a stay order to further delay execution proceedings. he submitted that the applicant is not entitled for the benefit of section 14 of limitation act, as the applicant is abusing the process of law. he drew attention of the court towards paragraph-12 of the objection dated 22.03.2010 filed by ..... wrong advice, he did not file second appeal before this court in the year 2004 itself, therefore, he is entitled for the benefit under section 14 of limitation act which provides that in case the litigant avails wrong remedy against any judgment, the intervening time consumed in availing proper remedy will be given to such litigant. learned ..... the judgment of this high court rendered in laxmi and others vs. beg ram reported in 2011 (2) uttarakhand decisions-111, balbir singh vs. commissioner garhwal mandal, dehradun and others passed by this court on 9thjanuary, 2009 in writ petition no. 1325 of 2005 (m/s), naresh sharma and others vs. ramesh chand and others, reported in air .....

Jagdish Chand Vs. Manager Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd. a ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... expected that it would reach its destination within 72 hours.the information sought under right to information act, 2005 shows that the postal article had reached chennai within 72 hours, but the respondent no. 2 did not deliver it within stipulated time and the respondent no. 1, without considering the problem of block holidays, did not renew the policy. 5. ..... for the period from 01.08.2009 to 31.07.2010, the premium was sent by the complainant to opposite party no. 1 on 11.08.2009 through speed post from g.p.o., dehradun opposite party no. 2. it is alleged that the postal department could not deliver the speed post within 72 hours and it was received ..... complainant has filed this appeal. 3. we have heard the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1 and 2 and perused the material placed on record. 4. the appellant, referring to certain informations sought by him under right to information act, 2005 submitted that the speed post was sent on 11.08.2009 from g.p.o., dehradun .....

Sab Singh Mehra Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Others

Court : Uttaranchal

..... working of the employee does not disqualify that employee from being a candidate for the election of a gram pradhan. in view of the aforesaid, section 2 (c) of the act of 1994 is not applicable. the said provision is confined to providing reservation in the educational institutions. the mere fact that aid is provided by the ..... of profit and that the state govt. has no control on day-to-day functioning of the educational institution or on its employees. consequently, the impugned order passed by the district magistrate removing the petitioner from ..... the educational institution. there must be deep and pervasive control. in the light of the aforesaid, the court is of the opinion that the state govt. has no power to appoint or remove the petitioner as a junior clerk in the educational institution. consequently, the court holds that the petitioner was not holding an office .....

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Through Its Sampati Prabandh Adhikari a ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... . this revision petition under section 17(1)(b) of the consumer protection act, 1986 has been preferred against the order dated 06.11.2008 passed by the district forum, dehradun in consumer complaint no. 27 of 2002, whereby the district forum has condoned the delay in filing the consumer complaint. 2. briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer ..... year 1989, the complainant applied for allotment of type i house under the self-financing scheme floated by u.p. awas evam vikas parishad (hereinafter referred to as parishad?) and deposited sum of rs.25,000/- towards registration fee. the estimated cost of the house was rs.2,68,000/-. the parishad vide their registered letter dated 27.02.1992, informed the .....

Indian Lpg Cylinders Vs. Cestat

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2010(253)ELT393(NULL)

..... that, if an assessee is entitled to a refund, such refund shall not be made to him except in accordance with the procedure established under sub-section (2) of section 11b of the act.(6) notwithstanding the provisions of self-assessment in this rule, in cases of provisional assessment, the final assessment shall be made by the proper officer.5. ..... case of goods which are exempt from payment of duty by a special order issued under sub-section (2) of section 5-a, the date of issue of such order;(eb) in case where duty of excise is paid provisionally under this act or the rules made thereunder, the date of adjustment of duty after the final assessment thereof;(ec) ..... appellate tribunal of any court in any other provision of this act or the rules made thereunder or any other law for the time being in force, no refund shall be made except as provided in sub-section (2).(4) every notification under clause (f) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) shall be laid before each house of parliament, if .....