Array ( [0] => ..... may also be mentioned that the board for reviewing the cases of its employees constituted a screening committee which reviewed the cases consisted of member (accounts and finance), the secretary of the board and the financial advisor and controller of accounts. this committee after holding the meetings recommended the names of eight officials including ..... reasons best known as if that either going to improve the case or would change the settled law. the present case is not an exception to this.2. appellant filed this special appeal against the judgment of the learned single judge, dated 2nd august, 1984, whereby the learned single judge allowed the writ petition ..... to make regulations for governing the service of its employees under section 79(c) of the said act. the board has formed rules and regulations covering all the employees and the relevant provisions are contained in regulation no. 18(4) of the rajasthan state electricity board employees service regulation 1964. to trace the short ..... [1] => ..... six months from today with reference to this case. this is so because it is felt that state should scrupulously avoid unnecessary litigation and being a welfare state should act fairly and accord equal treatment to all similarly situated persons. ever since the division bench judgment quoted above and two judgments of single benches including present one, the ..... of rsr.9. consequently, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to give the arrears of pension computing the same under rule 268k of the act with effect from the date of death of the husband of the petitioner on 17.12.1991 till date within a period of 3 months from today. the said ..... extract including the extract of the division bench judgment from the judgment of learned single judge in vinod kanwar's case (supra).2. the validity of these rules was challenged before this court in d.b.civil writ petition no. 1668/1987 (smt. savita yasav v. the state of raj.). this court held (sic! allowed) the said writ petition ..... [2] => ..... reservation of seats of superspeciality courses (d.m./m.ch.) for in-service candidates from the academic session 2010-11. the state government communicated vide letter no.f.6(2)m.e./gr.1/10 jaipur dated 16.07.2010 (copy enclosed) to delete the last line and should be below the age of 45 years under ..... one of classification of the sources from which admissions have to be accorded and the principles at times applied in construing provisions relating to reservation simpliciter will have no relevance to such classification of the sources. learned counsel therefore, contended that reservation for in-service candidates must not be equated with the reservation as understood on ..... the right of the respondents to make the challenge before the learned single judge with regard to validity or any infirmity in enacting the aforesaid ordinance as no such ground exists in the petition. so far as the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is concerned, that while passing order dated 31/ ..... [3] => ..... fact, he has submitted that the instant report was lodged with an oblique motive so as to get rid of the proceedings of divorce, which were initiated by the petitioner no. 1 against the informant before the civil judge (senior division), gandhi nagar, gujarat. it is further submitted that the allegations made in the report are totally concocted and ..... pre-arrest bail by filing this application under section 438 cr.p.c. the matter relates to a matrimonial dispute between the members of indian civil services. the petitioner no. 1 is a member of indian civil services of 2004 batch. likewise the complainant is a member of 2005 batch. an introduction between the parties during the earlier period ..... s.h.o./i.o./arresting authority, police station mahila thana, jaipur city (south) in f.i.r. no. 92/2008 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners (1) rahul gupta s/o shri babu lal gupta; (2) babu lal gupta s/o shri ramjilal gupta and (3) smt. krishna gupta wife of shri babu lal gupta ..... [4] => ..... dispute arises between the petitioners union of india through the secretary defence, ministry of defence, government of india, new delhi and the state of rajasthan through the secretary finance, government of rajasthan, jaipur; a committee of senior officers under the chairmanship of the chief secretary of the state of rajasthan is to be constituted and this ..... of the petitioners that they are not required under the law to get themselves registered with the non- petitioners as dealer within the meaning of section 2(14) of the act of 1994. the fact that the petitioners are making purchase of goods from various suppliers/sellers and making such goods available to their contractors is informed ..... the union of india should have taken this matter with the state of rajasthan at the ministry level rather than to feel satisfy to approach to respondent no. 3. respondent no. 3 is the the lowest officer in the ladder in the system. he is the assessing officer of tax and he would have given the notice ..... [5] => ..... navin chander sharma, j.1. yashwant singh singhvi non-petitioner no. 2 was proprietor of m/s. shiva chemicals, udaipur, who had obtained a soft loan of rs. 1,84,000/- from the rajasthan finance corporation repayable in yearly instalments. singhvi paid interest for the first year but failed to take the payment of instalments for the year 1978 ..... , a complaint had been filed against the appellant charging him that having committed offence under section 54(1)(a) and section 57(c) of the bihar and orissa act, 1915, it was found that the allegations contained in the complaint filed by the excise inspector did not constitute any offence. the appellant moved the high court under ..... 's application under order 39, rule 4, cpc filed and was held to have rightly been rejected by the additional district judge. so far as miscellaneous appeal no. 114 of 1980 of the r.f.c. was concerned, the appeal was partly allowed and the restraint order passed against the corporation restraining it from auctioning ..... [6] => ..... can go into the said questions relating to the liability and the recovery except as provided in the act. point no. 1 is decided accordingly.points nos. 2 and 3:does the act overrides the provisions of sections 442 and 537 and section 446 of the companies act ?in our view, the decision of the kerala high court in industrial credit and investment corporation of india ..... instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this act.(2) the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948 (15 of 1948), the state financial corporations act, 1951 (63 of 1951), the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of 1963), the industrial reconstruction bank of india ..... [7] => ..... six months from today with reference to this case. this is so because it is felt that state should scrupulously avoid unnecessary litigation and being a welfare state should act fairly and accord equal treatment to all similarly situated persons. ever since the division bench judgment quoted above and two judgments of single benches including present one, the ..... rsr.9. consequently, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to give the arrears of pension computing the same under rule 268-k or the act with effect from the date of death of the husband of the petitioner oh 17.12.1991 till date within a period of 8 months from today. the said ..... extract including the extract of the division bench judgment from the judgment of learned single judge in vinod kanwar's case (supra).2. the validity of these rules was challenged before this court in d.b. civil writ petition no. 1668/1987 (smt. savita vadav v. the state of raj.). this court held (sic allowed) the said writ petition ..... [8] => ..... process of selection in between, is wholly arbitrary. in any case, if respondent-bank did not timely withdraw the indent, appellants cannot be held responsible for the act of the respondent-bank. it is, therefore, prayed that the special appeal be allowed, the judgment of the learned single judge be set-aside and the ..... for alwar-bharatpur anchlik gramin bank and since the appellants were residents of district alwar, they opted for appointment in that bank. had they known that respondent no.1-bank was not serious about making recruitment, they would have opted for any other bank and in that eventuality, they would have got the appointment ..... writ petitions were dismissed by a common judgment. 2) shri rajendra soni, learned counsel for the appellants has argued that the learned single judge has failed to appreciate that appellants / writ-petitioners were wrongfully denied appointment on the post of field supervisors. it is contended that respondent no.1-bank had sent an indent of nine ..... [9] => ..... engineering courses conducted by the college of technology and engineering, udaipur, the fourth respondent herein. the petitioner had given second option for mining branch under self finance seat (sfs) and ninth option for mining branch under government aided seats (gas). after filling up online option form, the respondent issued institution-wise ..... at the stage when the entire admission process is over, deserves to be dismissed. it is submitted that section 46 of the mines act, 1952, specifically provides that no woman shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law be employed in any part of a mine which is below ground and since ..... discipline of mining engineering [b.e. (mining)] in the college of technology and engineering, udaipur, while extending benefit of reservation under the women category. 2. the facts leading to filing of the present petition are that the board of technical education, rajasthan, issued an advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates for ..... ) Finance No 2 Act 2009 Chapter Iii Direct Taxes - Court Rajasthan - Page 100 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: rajasthan Page 100 of about 1,168 results (0.120 seconds)

Aug 29 1991 (HC)

Raj. State Electricity Board Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLC275; 1991WLN(UC)457

..... may also be mentioned that the board for reviewing the cases of its employees constituted a screening committee which reviewed the cases consisted of member (accounts and finance), the secretary of the board and the financial advisor and controller of accounts. this committee after holding the meetings recommended the names of eight officials including ..... reasons best known as if that either going to improve the case or would change the settled law. the present case is not an exception to this.2. appellant filed this special appeal against the judgment of the learned single judge, dated 2nd august, 1984, whereby the learned single judge allowed the writ petition ..... to make regulations for governing the service of its employees under section 79(c) of the said act. the board has formed rules and regulations covering all the employees and the relevant provisions are contained in regulation no. 18(4) of the rajasthan state electricity board employees service regulation 1964. to trace the short .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 23 2008 (HC)

Pappu Devi (Mst.) Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2009(2)WLN338

..... six months from today with reference to this case. this is so because it is felt that state should scrupulously avoid unnecessary litigation and being a welfare state should act fairly and accord equal treatment to all similarly situated persons. ever since the division bench judgment quoted above and two judgments of single benches including present one, the ..... of rsr.9. consequently, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to give the arrears of pension computing the same under rule 268k of the act with effect from the date of death of the husband of the petitioner on 17.12.1991 till date within a period of 3 months from today. the said ..... extract including the extract of the division bench judgment from the judgment of learned single judge in vinod kanwar's case (supra).2. the validity of these rules was challenged before this court in d.b.civil writ petition no. 1668/1987 (smt. savita yasav v. the state of raj.). this court held (sic! allowed) the said writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 28 2010 (HC)

Rajasthan University of Health Sciences and anr. Vs. Dr. Govind Sharma ...

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... reservation of seats of superspeciality courses (d.m./m.ch.) for in-service candidates from the academic session 2010-11. the state government communicated vide letter no.f.6(2)m.e./gr.1/10 jaipur dated 16.07.2010 (copy enclosed) to delete the last line and should be below the age of 45 years under ..... one of classification of the sources from which admissions have to be accorded and the principles at times applied in construing provisions relating to reservation simpliciter will have no relevance to such classification of the sources. learned counsel therefore, contended that reservation for in-service candidates must not be equated with the reservation as understood on ..... the right of the respondents to make the challenge before the learned single judge with regard to validity or any infirmity in enacting the aforesaid ordinance as no such ground exists in the petition. so far as the submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is concerned, that while passing order dated 31/ .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 06 2009 (HC)

Rahul Gupta and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(4)Raj2967

..... fact, he has submitted that the instant report was lodged with an oblique motive so as to get rid of the proceedings of divorce, which were initiated by the petitioner no. 1 against the informant before the civil judge (senior division), gandhi nagar, gujarat. it is further submitted that the allegations made in the report are totally concocted and ..... pre-arrest bail by filing this application under section 438 cr.p.c. the matter relates to a matrimonial dispute between the members of indian civil services. the petitioner no. 1 is a member of indian civil services of 2004 batch. likewise the complainant is a member of 2005 batch. an introduction between the parties during the earlier period ..... s.h.o./i.o./arresting authority, police station mahila thana, jaipur city (south) in f.i.r. no. 92/2008 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioners (1) rahul gupta s/o shri babu lal gupta; (2) babu lal gupta s/o shri ramjilal gupta and (3) smt. krishna gupta wife of shri babu lal gupta .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 18 2001 (HC)

U.O.i. and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2003(1)WLN644

..... dispute arises between the petitioners union of india through the secretary defence, ministry of defence, government of india, new delhi and the state of rajasthan through the secretary finance, government of rajasthan, jaipur; a committee of senior officers under the chairmanship of the chief secretary of the state of rajasthan is to be constituted and this ..... of the petitioners that they are not required under the law to get themselves registered with the non- petitioners as dealer within the meaning of section 2(14) of the act of 1994. the fact that the petitioners are making purchase of goods from various suppliers/sellers and making such goods available to their contractors is informed ..... the union of india should have taken this matter with the state of rajasthan at the ministry level rather than to feel satisfy to approach to respondent no. 3. respondent no. 3 is the the lowest officer in the ladder in the system. he is the assessing officer of tax and he would have given the notice .....

Tag this Judgment!
Mar 19 1987 (HC)

Kumar Rajeev Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN761

..... navin chander sharma, j.1. yashwant singh singhvi non-petitioner no. 2 was proprietor of m/s. shiva chemicals, udaipur, who had obtained a soft loan of rs. 1,84,000/- from the rajasthan finance corporation repayable in yearly instalments. singhvi paid interest for the first year but failed to take the payment of instalments for the year 1978 ..... , a complaint had been filed against the appellant charging him that having committed offence under section 54(1)(a) and section 57(c) of the bihar and orissa act, 1915, it was found that the allegations contained in the complaint filed by the excise inspector did not constitute any offence. the appellant moved the high court under ..... 's application under order 39, rule 4, cpc filed and was held to have rightly been rejected by the additional district judge. so far as miscellaneous appeal no. 114 of 1980 of the r.f.c. was concerned, the appeal was partly allowed and the restraint order passed against the corporation restraining it from auctioning .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 31 2006 (HC)

Official Liquidator, Spark Plugs (i) Ltd. Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2007]135CompCas495(Raj); [2007]77SCL28(Raj); 2006(3)WLC565

..... can go into the said questions relating to the liability and the recovery except as provided in the act. point no. 1 is decided accordingly.points nos. 2 and 3:does the act overrides the provisions of sections 442 and 537 and section 446 of the companies act ?in our view, the decision of the kerala high court in industrial credit and investment corporation of india ..... instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this act.(2) the provisions of this act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the industrial finance corporation act, 1948 (15 of 1948), the state financial corporations act, 1951 (63 of 1951), the unit trust of india act, 1963 (52 of 1963), the industrial reconstruction bank of india .....

Tag this Judgment!
Oct 23 2008 (HC)

Papu Devi (Mst.) Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1059

..... six months from today with reference to this case. this is so because it is felt that state should scrupulously avoid unnecessary litigation and being a welfare state should act fairly and accord equal treatment to all similarly situated persons. ever since the division bench judgment quoted above and two judgments of single benches including present one, the ..... rsr.9. consequently, this writ petition is allowed and the respondents are directed to give the arrears of pension computing the same under rule 268-k or the act with effect from the date of death of the husband of the petitioner oh 17.12.1991 till date within a period of 8 months from today. the said ..... extract including the extract of the division bench judgment from the judgment of learned single judge in vinod kanwar's case (supra).2. the validity of these rules was challenged before this court in d.b. civil writ petition no. 1668/1987 (smt. savita vadav v. the state of raj.). this court held (sic allowed) the said writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 11 2010 (HC)

Prabhu Dayal Boondwal. Vs. Alwar-bharatpur Anchlik GramIn Bank and anr ...

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... process of selection in between, is wholly arbitrary. in any case, if respondent-bank did not timely withdraw the indent, appellants cannot be held responsible for the act of the respondent-bank. it is, therefore, prayed that the special appeal be allowed, the judgment of the learned single judge be set-aside and the ..... for alwar-bharatpur anchlik gramin bank and since the appellants were residents of district alwar, they opted for appointment in that bank. had they known that respondent no.1-bank was not serious about making recruitment, they would have opted for any other bank and in that eventuality, they would have got the appointment ..... writ petitions were dismissed by a common judgment. 2) shri rajendra soni, learned counsel for the appellants has argued that the learned single judge has failed to appreciate that appellants / writ-petitioners were wrongfully denied appointment on the post of field supervisors. it is contended that respondent no.1-bank had sent an indent of nine .....

Tag this Judgment!
Jul 08 2015 (HC)

Sundra Sodha Vs. State of Rajasthan and Others

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

..... engineering courses conducted by the college of technology and engineering, udaipur, the fourth respondent herein. the petitioner had given second option for mining branch under self finance seat (sfs) and ninth option for mining branch under government aided seats (gas). after filling up online option form, the respondent issued institution-wise ..... at the stage when the entire admission process is over, deserves to be dismissed. it is submitted that section 46 of the mines act, 1952, specifically provides that no woman shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law be employed in any part of a mine which is below ground and since ..... discipline of mining engineering [b.e. (mining)] in the college of technology and engineering, udaipur, while extending benefit of reservation under the women category. 2. the facts leading to filing of the present petition are that the board of technical education, rajasthan, issued an advertisement inviting applications from eligible candidates for .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //