Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: chennai Page 17 of about 4,713 results (0.376 seconds)

Lakshmi Vidhya Sangam Vs. Regional Transport Officer and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR2008Mad173; (2009)1MLJ1221

..... transporting students or staff of the educational institution in connection with any of its activities;8. he submitted that section 66(1) of the motor vehicles act 1988 provides that no motor vehicle shall be used or permitted to be used as a transport vehicle in any public place, unless it obtains a permit in accordance with ..... for the purpose of transporting students and staff of educational institution, in connection with its activities.19. a 'private service vehicle' is defined under section 2(33) of the act, which means a motor vehicle constructed or adapted to carry more than six persons, excluding the driver and ordinarily used by or on behalf of the ..... and. therefore, there is no violation of principles of natural justice.heard the counsel appearing for the parties and perused the materials available on record.15. before adverting to the facts of this case, it is relevant to extract the definition of the owner as provided under section 2(30) of the motor vehicles act, 1988.30. 'owner' .....

M. Natarajan Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Spe/Cbi/Acb

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(197)ELT476(Mad)

..... section 239 of the criminal procedure code, accused shall be given an opportunity of being heard.6. learned counsel for the petitioner drew my attention to the various provisions of finance act 2/98 and more particularly, section 86 in chapter iv of the special enactment and also to the kar vivad samadhan scheme of 1998 (kvss) which was framed with ..... petitioner will enable him to get discharge from the prosecution. in case it could not form any basis for discharge or quash, then however unimpeachable it be, no useful purpose would thereby flow to petitioner.11. before ever testifying the utility of kvss scheme in favour of petitioner, the chance of statutory exclusion under section 95 ..... prima facie be made out on identical allegations i.e. of evasion of customs duty and violation of any notification issued under the said act.in the present case, there is no prima facie case made out in respect of the alleged offence under section 120-b read with section 420 ipc and, therefore, the charge .....

K.Radhalakshmi Vs. the Secretary and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... are all tenants under k.radhalakshmi, that there is a deemed taking over of possession by the combined reading of sections 12(1) and 11(3) of the principal act, has no meaning. on the factual matrix, while it is true that five instalments of amounts have been sent by the state after declaring excess of vacant lands, it remains an ..... . with the result, k.radhalakshmi is entitled to retain possession of the extent of 4131.598 square meters comprised in survey no.151/1 part, ramapuram village as per section 3(2) of the repeal act and the petitioners in w.p.nos.16690, 24933 to 24935, and 25998 to 26002 of 2009, viz., tenants, who have filed writ petitions for a direction ..... the land is declared surplus, the repeal act cannot be stated to confer any better right to the government. that was also the view of this court, as held by a.kulasekaran,j., as he then was, in simpson and general finance company limited v. the state of tamil nadu and another, 2006-4-lw-787. while construing the savings clause .....

G. Eswaran Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Deputy Superintend ...

Court : Chennai

..... considering the said explanation of the petitioner, has filed the charge-sheet for the offences under section 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the provisions of the p.c. act. learned counsel further contended that absolutely, there is no material to show as to whether the explanation given by the petitioner was considered or not. in this ..... regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that absolutely, there is no prima-facie case to file the charge sheet against the petitioner under sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the p.c. act, the learned counsel relied on a decision of the supreme court reported in air 1993 sc 313 ..... hence, as per the prosecution, the petitioner/accused had committed an offence punishable under section 13(2) read with 13(1)(e) of the prevention of corruption act. the charge sheet was filed against the petitioner before the trial court in crime no.11/ac/2009/cc-iii for the said offences. challenging the said criminal proceedings initiated against .....

The Planters Association of Tamil Nadu. Vs. the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

..... emphasis added)23. in support of the said proposition, the learned senior counsel placed reliance upon a judgment of the supreme court in ghaziabad development authority v. delhi auto & general finance (p) ltd., reported in (1994) 4 scc 42 = air 1994 sc 2263 and referred to paragraph 6 of the said judgment which reads as follows : 6.....section ..... 1955, which it is proposed to issue, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 43 read with section 18 of the plantation labour act, 1951 (central act lxix of 1951) is hereby published for information of all the persons likely to be affected thereby as required by sub-section (1) of section 43 of the ..... question of grant to local authorities and cantonment boards as provided under section 7 of the taxation act but we are concerned with the leviability of tax on motor vehicles under section 3(2) of the taxation act. it is nobody's case that no tax was being levied on motor vehicles which is used or kept for use under section 3 .....

Silver Cloud Tea Factory and Another Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1994Mad283

..... operate for the benefit of any person. in support of this contention, the learned counsel for the appellant relied on the following observations of the supreme court in peerless general finance and investment co. limited v. reserve bank of india, : 1991crilj1391 :'49. the question emerges whether paragraphs (6) and (12) are altra vires articles 19(1)(g ..... position, it has to be held that s. 30(3) of the act docs not suffer from the vices of excessive delegation of legislative power or arbitrariness and therefore, it is not liable to be struck down. point no. i is answered accordingly.22. point no. 2 : the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the provisions ..... tea and tea seeds, chapter v deals with the finance, accounts and audit. chapter vi deals with the control by the central government. section 30 occurs in chapter vi and it deals with the power to control price and distribution of tea or tea waste. subsections (1) and (2) of s. 30 relate to fixation of price. sub .....

United India Roller Flour Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1981(8)ELT66(Mad)

..... excisable goods' means the goods as specified in the first schedule to the central excises and salt act. therefore, the liability to excise duty is created as soon as any goods are specified in the first schedule. by clause 40 of the finance (no. 2) bill, 1971, tariff item 1f, levying a duty of excise at the rate of 10 ..... first schedule to the central excises and salt act. in view of these decisions, the exemption to maida from excise duty by notification dated 10-8-1971, does not have the effect of deleting or amending the tariff entry 1f as introduced by the finance (no. 2) bill, 1971 and accordingly, the finance (no. 2) bill, 1971 cannot be said to have ..... is expedient in the public interest that any provision of the bill relating to such imposition or increase shall have immediate effect under the act."5. it is not in dispute that the finance bill no. (2) of 1971 did contain a declaration that the provision in the bill relating to imposition of excise duty on maida would have immediate .....

P. Giribabu Vs. Deputy Director of Enforcement

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2010]99SCL268(Mad)

..... on oath contended that the proceeding became a judicial proceeding in the wider sense of the word. in our view the oaths act has no application here. the preamble to the act shows that it was an act to consolidate the law relating to judicial oaths, affirmations and declarations and was enacted because the legislature though it 'expedient to ..... the appearance of the petitioner on 23-10-2009. in response, the petitioner appeared on his own before the said officer.(iii) there is no provision under fema, 1999 and income-tax act, 1961 to permit the petitioner to appear with a lawyer of his choice, as the petitioner is called for giving evidence under summons. a ..... issued to them under section 37 of the foreign exchange management act, 1999 (fema) and recording of statement, though the advocate will be present beyond the hearing distance, if need be.2. the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition in w.p. no. 23110 of 2009, in nutshell is set out hereunder:(i .....

M.S.Muhammed Sheik Abdullah Vs. the Secretary and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... appellant was called on 30.09.2009. the seat available in the government quota with the respondent no.2 was filled up by way of allotment in favour of the appellant. the appellant paid a sum of rs.25,000/- towards the partial amount of the tuition ..... . he was called for the counseling on 14.07.2009 and was waitlisted for the mbbs course. in the subsequent counseling also, he was not selected in the self financing medical colleges for want of vacancies. on 29.09.2009, another candidate, by name, selvi.shafeequa jammal expressed her unwillingness to join the medical course and hence, the ..... ), lord mac dermot observed: the matter cannot, of course, be settled merely by treating the ipsissima vertra of willes,j. as though they were part of an act of parliament and applying the rules of interpretation appropriate thereto. this is not to detract from the great weight to be given to the language actually used by that most .....

K.Rajaram and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... , the land in question had been allotted to the tamil nadu police housing corporation limited, vide g.o.ms.no.175, revenue ulc 1 (2), dated 14.2.1997. the order determining the amount payable, under section 12(6) of the act had been issued by the third respondent, on 16.12.2002, and it had been sent to the urban ..... in question had been allotted to the tamil nadu police housing corporation limited, vide g.o.ms.no.175, (revenue ulc 1 (2), dated 14.2.1997. an order determining the amount payable to the urban land owner, under section 12(6) of the act, had been issued by the third respondent, on 16.12.2002. even though the urban land ..... land in question would vest with the petitioners. as per section 3(2) of the repeal act, 1999, the lands in question would continue to be with the petitioners, as the procedures contemplated under the repeal act had not been followed. therefore, the fourth respondent had no jurisdiction or authority to refuse to process the application of the petitioners for .....