Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: allahabad Page 9 of about 2,245 results (1.235 seconds)

May 15 1996 (HC)

M/S. Tiveni Engineering Works Ltd. and Another Etc. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1996All420

..... really been changedon several occasions. the first of the guidelines referred to in the affidavit of the parties, is contained in press note no. 1 of 1987 series issued by the ministry of finance. government of india (annexure-9 to the writ petition of m/s. triveni engineering works ltd., khatoli). the pressnote speaks of ..... a decision on the part of the government to grant industrial licence under the industrial (development and regulation) act, 1951, for the establishment of expansion ..... the industries(d&r;) act, 1951 for the manufacture of sugar falling under scheduled industry no. 25. dear sir/sirs, i am directed to refer to your above application and to say that an older applicant with sound industrial/financial background has been granted a letter of intent for the same location. 2. in the circumstances, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1993 (HC)

Modi Industries Ltd. Vs. Additional Labour Commissioner and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ482All

..... non-payment of wages already accrued to the workers would not be any justification on the part of petitioner. under the provisions of u.p.act of 1978 respondent no. 1 had no option but to proceed and take action to prevent the unrest among the workers. the liability was admitted by petitioner is clear from the impugned ..... this submission, learned counsel has relied on the case of maharashtra state board of secondary and higher secondary education v. k.s. gandhi and ors. (1991)2 scc 716.5. second submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that the industry of the petitioner has been declared sick under the provisions of sick industries companies ..... (special provisions) act of 1985 (hereinafter referred to as act of 1985) and the scheme for financial assistance and rehabilitation of petitioner's factory is under consideration of the board of industrial finance and reconstruction (in short b.i.f.r.) and the pro- i .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1998 (HC)

S.N. Seth Vs. Smt. Prakashwati and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1999All242

..... release application stood disposed of finally and nothing remains pending to be decided subsequently and, therefore, in my view this order was revisable under section 18 of the act and no error has been committed by the learned 9th additional district judge in entertaining the revision,10. the authorities cited and relied upon by the learned counsel for the ..... viz. (i) the order dated 1-11-1988 of the rent control and eviction officer not being the final order was not revisable under section 18 of the act. (ii) the revisional court has erred in recording its own finding regarding vacancy instead of remitting back the case to the rent control and eviction officer for giving finding on ..... not being temporary residence, elsewhere. (4) any building or part which a landlord or tenant has ceased to occupy within the meaning of sub-section (1), or sub-section (2), or 16 (sub-section (3), sub-section (3-a) or sub-section (3-b), shall, for the purposes of this chapter, be deemed to be vacant.'thus, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 1991 (HC)

M/S. International Data Management Ltd. and Others Vs. State of U.P. a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1991All369

..... with the registrar of firms of u.p. while the third petitioner is a citizen of india. the first petitioner carries on its business through petitioner nos. 2 and 3. the departments of the government, public corporations and local authorities are increasingly purchasing and using electronic goods for a more efficient discharge of their ..... state government purporting to be in furtherance of its objective of encouraging co-operative societies. even so 'the order was still unauthorised. under the essential commodities act, 1955 the state government had issued an order for distribution of sugar through licensed dealers and the respondents have obtained licences in that behalf. their licences ..... goods specified in the letter from m/s. uptron (india) ltd., alone. m/s. uptron (india) ltd., is a company incorporated under the companies act owned and controlled by the government of u.p. and engaged in the manufacture of electronic goods. the first petitioner m/s. international data management ltd. is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 1953 (HC)

Sagir Ahmad and ors. Vs. the Govt. of the State of Uttar Pradesh and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All257

..... . the bill was ultimately passed in 1950 and is known as u. p. state road transport acts 1950, (act no. ii of 1951), and it willfoe hereafter referred to as the impugned act.in accordance with the provisions of this act,certain schemes were framed by the state government, notices of which were published in the state gazette ..... necessary 'permit' to operate their vehicles under the motor vehicles act of 1939. the uttar pradesh government has, by virtue of powers conferred upon it by the uttar pradesh state road transport act, 1950 (u. p. act no. ii of 1951), hereinafter referred to as the impugned act, in effect stopped some of the petitioners from plying their vehicles ..... on the public highways and instead commenced plying vehicles of its own.2. all the petitions have more or less bought common .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 1996 (HC)

Nirmal Dass Bose Vs. Km. Mamta Gulati

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1997All401; I(1997)DMC272

..... to the marriage where the requirement is not complied with leading to the inevitable conclusion that such a marriage is void and of no legal consequence. the proviso to s. 12(2) of the act carves out an exceptio to the presumption ordinarily available in favour of there being a marriage in law where a marriage in fact ..... it is, therefore, obvious that an artificial probative effect is thus given by law to certain facts and no evidence is allowed to be produced with a view of combating that effect. the provisions contained s. 13(2) of the special marriage act, 1954, does not use the expression 'conclusive proof' but instead the expression used therein is 'conclusive ..... , that once the facts attracting the grounds indicated in s. 24(1) of the act subject the exceptio provided for under sub-section (2) thereof are proved to exist, no marriage in fact can be recognised as a marriage in law and no marital status as refereed to hereinabove can flow from such a marriage but as indicated hereinabove .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1959 (HC)

Oudh Sugar Mills Ltd., Hargaon Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1960All136

..... , for the purposes of such local authority, any tax included in schedule ii to the rules.' entries nos. 2 and 3 in schedule ii were as follows:'2. a tax on land or land values.3. a tax on buildings.'in the 1935 act by means of entry no. 42 in list ii? the provincial legislature was empowered to levy a tax on lands and building ..... this argument it is contended that such a tax cannot be a tax on land and cannot, therefore, be covered by entry no. 49 of list ii. in my opinion there is no sub-stance in this argument. the act imposes a tax on land which is to be calculated on its annual value.the annual value has got to be determined ..... v. commissioner of income-tax : [1952]21itr458(bom) , where the learned chief justice made the following observations with regard to entry no. 55 in list i and contrasted it with entry no. 42 of list ii of the 1935 act:'whereas the provincial legislature is competent to impose a tax on lands 'and buildings, the central legislature is empowered under entry 55 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 1976 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Ltd. Vs. R.D. Saxena, Director of Investigation and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas323(All)

..... any other facts or inspection of any document did not arise. thereafter, the nylon spinners filed their written statements, vide annexure ' e '. respondent no. 5 filed the statement of his case, vide annexure ' f '. the registrar, respondent no. 2, acting under regulations of 1970 and 1971, filed his answer to the statement of the case referred to above. the nylon spinners then submitted their ..... framed :' 1. whether the agreement dated september 9, 1973, has the approval of the central government within the meaning of section 33(3) of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices act ? 2. if the answer to issue no. 1 be in the affirmative, whether the agreement is outside the purview of sections 10 and 37 of the monopolies and restrictive trade practices .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2000 (HC)

U. P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. and Others Vs. Raza Buland Sugar Co ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC3403

..... plaint and further sought declaration that the properties mentioned in paragraph 10 of the plaint are outside the purview of ordinance no. 13 of 1971 and u. p. act no. 23 of 1971 and the defendants nos. 2 and 5 were not entitled to the possession of those properties.5. the plaintiffs, during the pendency of the suit, ..... director of the company is covered by the definition of scheduled undertaking under section 2(h)(vi) of the act 1971. this property will vest with the u. p. state sugar corporation under section 3 of the act.2. hari bhawan.--p.w. 1, plaintiff no. 2, himself stated that hari bhawan was being used for stay of the directors ..... . are used for thepurpose of factory. these hernsare covered under clause (i) ofsection 2 (h) of the act and shallbe taken as scheduledundertaking.8. the managerial set up of plaintiff no. 1 and its subsidiary company including its secretary's residence bungalow no. 2 and administrate manager's residence ra-4 situate near the cenfraf office, civil lines, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2000 (HC)

Brij Bhushan Lal and Sons Vs. Designated Authority

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(All)137; [2001]246ITR353(All)

..... the adjustments were rightly made as the assessing officer was entitled to realise the amount under section 226 of the income tax act, 1961. it is claimed that in the meantime, the petitioner made declarations under section 89 of the finance (no. 2) act of 1998. known as 'kar vivad samadhan scheme, 1998' (hereinafter referred to as 'kvss') with regard to the wealth-tax liability ..... declarations under the kar vivad samadhan scheme have been rejected for the reason that there were no arrears of tax due from the petitioner on the date of the declaration, i.e., 31-12-1998.2. the petitioner's case is that by section 89 of the finance (no. 2) act, 1998, a scheme for settlement of tax disputes was introduced and the petitioner, which is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //