Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... if such capital goods are removed as such; or d) an amount under sub rule (2) of rule 16 of central excise rules, 2002; or e) service tax on any out put service; s. 68(1) and (2) of the finance act, 1994 read as follows: sec. 68. payment of service tax:- (1) every person providing taxable service to any ..... issue stands covered by two judgments, of the punjab and haryana high court as well as the delhi high court in the cases of commissioner of central excise, chandigarh vs. nahar industrial enterprises limited, str-2012-25-129 and in the case of commissioner of service tax vs. m/s. hero honda motors limited, 2013 (29) str 358 (delhi), respectively ..... . 3. the brief facts are, that the respondent assessee m/ s. godavari sugar mills limited, bagalkot, are said to be manufacturers of excisable goods and are holders of central excise registration and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... if such capital goods are removed as such; or d) an amount under sub rule (2) of rule 16 of central excise rules, 2002; or e) service tax on any output service; 7 s.68(1) and (2) of the finance act, 1994 read as follows: sec.68. payment of service tax:- (1) every person providing taxable service to any ..... issue stands covered by two judgments, of the punjab and haryana high court as well as the delhi high court in the cases of commissioner of central excise, chandigarh vs. nahar industrial enterprises limited, str-2012-25-129 and in the case of commissioner of service tax vs. m/s.hero honda motors limited, 2013 (29) str358(delhi), respectively. 3 ..... 3. the brief facts are, that the respondent assessee m/s.godavari sugar mills limited, bagalkot, are said to be manufacturers of excisable goods and are holders of central excise registration and .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... seeking an amendment in the main prayer, to include a challenge to act no. 13 of 2012. accordingly, it is declared that the karnataka religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment) act, 2011 and the karnataka religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment) act, 2012, as being discriminatory, violative of constitutional rights and are accordingly struck ..... it is stated that the respondents have not come up with any statement of objections for the last three years having contended that karnataka act no. 12/2012, which has been enacted later in point of time is not specifically challenged, have filed their objections to the amendment, however not attributing ..... court, we may examine the unamended provisions in relation to the amended provisions as brought about by the 2011 and the 2012 amendment acts. reproduced below are the provisions of the act, which came in for direct consideration by the division bench of this court in shri sahasra lingeshwara case, in holding .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... seeking an amendment in the main prayer, to include a challenge to act no.13 of 2012. accordingly, it is declared that the karnataka religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment ) act, 2011 and the karnataka religious institutions and charitable endowments (amendment) act, 2012, as being discriminatory, violative of constitutional rights and are accordingly struck down ..... 2 clause section (16): hindu does not include a buddhist, jain or sikh; 78 section as amended vide section as amended vide act no.27/2011 act no.12/2012 substituted as:- section 1(4): it shall apply to, all religious institutions or charitable endowments notified under section 23. section 53 and ..... . it is stated that the respondents have not come up with any statement of objections for the last three years having contended that karnataka act no.12/2012, which has been enacted later in point of time is not specifically challenged, have filed their objections to the amendment, however not attributing, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... , commercial tax department, belagavi division, dist:belagavi. (by sri g k hiregoudar, adv.) and : ... petitioner1 2.3. state of karnataka, rep by its principal secretary, finance department (commercial tax-ii) vidhana soudha, bengaluru-560001. the commissioner, commercial tax department, government of karnataka, gandhinagar, bengaluru-560009. the karnatak upa-lokayukta, rep by its registrar, ..... constitution of india praying to set aside the order dated:17.12.2015, passed by the hon'ble karnataka administrative tribunal, bengaluru in application no.1561/2012 at annexure-a and allow the application as prayed for. this petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, h.g. ramesh j., made the ..... crime no.3/2008 against the petitioner and -4- w.p.no.100805/2016 another for offences punishable under the provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1988.4. the sole contention urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that, there is absolutely no material to hold any inquiry against .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... years, occ: business :5. : r/o. subhashchandra nagar angol, belgaum 590 005 23. neena w/o krian chougala age:50. years, occ: household work r/o. opp. central bank indiranagar, bangalore24 kamal w/o. ravindra tanga age:52. years, occ: household work r/o. court road gulbarga-585 101 25.26. 27. vijaya nandkumar pokale age:48. ..... :25. : share. trial court loss sight of the fact that nanda kumar was an alcoholic.23. learned counsel for the appellants in r.f.a. no.4100/2012 submit that the judgment and decree of the trial court is unsustainable because, they are denied share in a schedule property i.e., business enterprises and industrial plots, properties ..... was a partition between the deceased bapusaheb and his brother shantaram lengade. the document styled as memorandum of partition dated 05.01.1964 has not :19. : been acted upon by the parties. the suit properties have been all along treated by the plaintiffs, defendant no.1 and his other brothers except nandkumar, as joint family properties. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... years, occ: business :5. : r/o. subhashchandra nagar angol, belgaum 590 005 23. neena w/o krian chougala age:50. years, occ: household work r/o. opp. central bank indiranagar, bangalore24 kamal w/o. ravindra tanga age:52. years, occ: household work r/o. court road gulbarga-585 101 25.26. 27. vijaya nandkumar pokale age:48. ..... :25. : share. trial court loss sight of the fact that nanda kumar was an alcoholic.23. learned counsel for the appellants in r.f.a. no.4100/2012 submit that the judgment and decree of the trial court is unsustainable because, they are denied share in a schedule property i.e., business enterprises and industrial plots, properties ..... was a partition between the deceased bapusaheb and his brother shantaram lengade. the document styled as memorandum of partition dated 05.01.1964 has not :19. : been acted upon by the parties. the suit properties have been all along treated by the plaintiffs, defendant no.1 and his other brothers except nandkumar, as joint family properties. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... a primary agricultural credit society. the depository kanara district central bank limited in the present case is admittedly not such a primary agricultural credit society. 15. the amendment of section 194a(3)(v) of the act excluding the co-operative banks from the definition of "co-operative society" by finance act, 2015 and requiring them to deduct income tax at ..... decision rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in the case of respondent assessee itself covers the field even for these assessment years from 2007-2008 to 2011-2012, but subsequently, the legislative amendments also makes the legislative intent explicit that the income earned by the co-operative bank or even through or from the co- ..... the respondent assessee. (iv) it was also urged that one of the appeals against this respondent assessee, namely ita no.100069 of 2016 for assessment year 2012-2013 in the case of cit vs. totagar's co-operative sale limited, has already been dismissed by a co-ordinate bench of this court on 05th .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... a primary agricultural credit society. the depository kanara district central bank limited in the present case is admittedly not such a primary agricultural credit society.15. the amendment of section 194a(3)(v) of the act excluding the co-operative banks from the definition of co- operative society by finance act, 2015 and requiring them to deduct income tax ..... the decision rendered by the hon ble supreme court in the case of respondent assessee itself covers the field even for these assessment years from 2007- 2008 to 2011-2012, but subsequently, the legislative amendments also makes the legislative intent explicit that the 28/57 date of judgment:16. 06.2017 ita no.100066/2016 & connected cases ..... hit the respondent assessee. (iv) it was also urged that one of the appeals against this respondent assessee, namely ita no.100069 of 2016 for assessment year 2012-2013 in the case of cit vs. totagar s 31/57 date of judgment:16. 06.2017 ita no.100066/2016 & connected cases the pr. commissioner of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... . the bar association is a collective of advocates, and has certain statutory obligations which it is required to discharge under the advocates welfare fund act, 2001 (for short the 2001 act). the central function that the legal profession must perform is nothing less than the administration of justice. (the practice of law is a public utility' - ..... against (i) the state (govt); (ii) authority; (iii) a statutory body; (iv) an instrumentality or agency of the state; ( v) a company which is financed and owned by the state; (vi) a private body run substantially on state funding; (vii) a private body discharging public duty or positive obligation of public nature (viii) ..... against (i) the state (govt); (ii) an authority; (iii) a statutory body; (iv) an instrumentality or agency of the state; (v) a company which is financed and owned by the state; (vi) a private body run substantially on state funding; (vii) a private body discharging public duty or positive obligation of public nature; and .....
Tag this Judgment!