Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-30-1972
Reported in : AIR1972Kant299; AIR1972Mys299
..... the state legislature under entries 23 and 50 of list ii would get denuded.6. it is necessary at this stage to refer to the provisions of the central act. the preamble of the central act shows that it was enacted with a view to provide for the regulation of mines and development of minerals under the control of the union. section 2 of ..... not empower the taluk board to levy any tax. our attention was drawn to the provisions of chapter ix of the state act dealing with property and finance of the taluk board and in particular to section 164 which exclusively provided for the levy of tax. it was argued that under section 143 it was open to the ..... taluk board to levy only a fee in connection with the regulation of trades falling under schedule ii of that act and that in the absence of any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-21-1972
Reported in : AIR1973Kant4; AIR1973Mys4; (1972)2MysLJ340
..... the current of authorities by which for so many years the law appeared to have been settled and in accordance with which it appeared to have been generally understood and acted upon. he proceeded to observe that it was the duty of the court administering hindu law not so much to enquire whether a disputed declaration was fairly deducible from the ..... the parties bhimiah, j. before whom the above appeal came up for hearing earlier, referred the appeal to a division bench under section 8 (2) of the mysore high court act by his order dated 13-4-1972 since he considered the question of law involved in this case was of considerable importance.3. sri t. s. ramachendra, the learned counsel .....
Tag this Judgment!