Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... the above clauses contained in the guidelines of mplad scheme, it is clear that there has been a close coordination between the authorities, namely, the central 13 cwp no.20278 of 2012 - 14 - government, state government and the district authorities. it is also clear that every member of parliament (lok sabha) is authorized to ..... agencies subordinate to the state, e.g., to promote construction of municipal public works, or to create a corporation authorised to use federal funds for financing private debtors throughout the nation. the power to make grants has been held to include the power to impose terms and conditions as to expenditure of ..... welfare measure/schemes under article 282; (iv) similar provision was contained in section 150(2) under the heading miscellaneous financial provisions . under the government of india act, 1935 and foreign constitution of democratic country like usa and australia.17. while considering the validity of such a scheme, the scope of judicial review was held .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... writ petition against an order deciding an application for waiver of condition of pre-deposit of duty is an appealable order in terms of section 35g of the central excise act, 1944 (for short the act ).therefore, the present writ petition cwp no.13288 o 2. challenging an order passed by the customs.excise and service tax appellate tribunal (for short the ..... deposit the amount before the appellate tribunal is an order made in appeal and if the answer is in the affirmative, whether an appeal lies under section 35g of the central excise act, 1944. we have no hesitation in holding that an order directing the deposit of the amount is an order made in appeal. section 35f opens with the words where ..... cwp no.13288 o 1. in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh date of decision: january 15, 2013 cwp no.13288 of 2012 m/s surya air products (p) ltd. petitioner versus the union of india & others respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice hemant gupta hon'ble ms.justice ritu bahri present: mr .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... followed by this court in asian exim international v. commissioner of income tax, jalandhar, punjab, ita no.469 of 2010, decided on 18.04.2011 and commissioner of income tax (central), ludhiana v. m/s davinder exports, guru nanak dev nagar, rahon road, ludhiana, ita no.371 of 2007, decided on 21.04.2011.9. the respondent's counsel on ..... order, there is no presumption that no enquiry was made by assessing officer, especially in view of the various aspects of deductions allowable under section 80ia & 80hhc of the act were elaborately considered and decided by assessing officer, as referred to by us in paras hereinabove. further, the issue was covered in favour of the assessee by the orders of ..... ita no.312 of 2011 -1- punjab and haryana high court at chandigarh ita no.312 of 2011 date of decision:20. 12.2012 commissioner of income tax-i, ludhiana ........ appellant versus m/s abhishek industries limited. ...... respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice surya kant hon'ble mr. justice r.p. nagrath 1 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... department will put up a proposal with full justification of de- reservation to the committee of secretaries of the state government comprising of chief secretary, finance secretary and the concerned administrative secretary. (19) the petitioners in their replication have controverted the state government s claim and have appended the advertisement dated ..... reserved were advertised in the past as well. (20) state of haryana has also filed its rejoinder along with a letter dated 2nd june, 2012 (annexure r5) received from the high court clarifying that the posts in haryana superior judicial service meant for the direct recruitment though were advertised on ..... reservation in direct recruitment to the posts in the subordinate judiciary also. after taking notice of the admitted facts that provisions of the state act were applicable for recruitment to the subordinate judiciary including district judges and there was no prior consultation with the high court before making such provision .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... madhya pradesh, air 196.sc 1815.the supreme court turned down the contention that the objections submitted against a proposed scheme required any express findings or that the central/state government should be asked to produce records relating to the equipment and financial position of the stus and that the nationalized routes are to be meant exclusively for ..... transport commissioner, punjab & anr., 2002(3) plr 816.and a division bench of this court, having regard to the admitted fact that no approval was accorded by the central government to the scheme so far as it pertained to inter- cwp no.15786 of 1999 transport matter - 22 - state routes, held that it was beyond the power ..... 14, 1993; june 18, 1998; january 1, 2001; may 3, 2011; not followed by a draft scheme proposed under section 99 of the 1988 act and notified on october 1, 2012: (124).there are seven cases pertaining to one or the other scheme published by state of haryana in purported exercise of its powers under section 99 of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... adherence of this procedure is essential for maintaining judicial discipline and proper functioning of the court. no departure from this procedure is permissible. 33. the constitution bench in central board of dawoodi bohra community s case (supra) crystallized the power of the chief justice in the matter of distribution of work, when it said as follows: 12 ..... the argument that the chief minister is part of the department constituted as a statutory authority under the act. examining the argument; whether the chief minister by his acts and speeches disqualified himself to act 36 c.m.no.15703 of 2012 in cwp no.14585 of 2011 for the state government in deciding the dispute, excluding the newspaper cuttings ..... status, that the statement of the law by a division 24 c.m.no.15703 of 2012 in cwp no.14585 of 2011 bench is considered binding on a division bench of the same or lesser number of judges. 29. in central board of dawoodi bohra community v. state of maharashtra (2005) 2 scc 673.the supreme .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... prolonged litigations and increase of not performing assets quite adversely affected the economy of the state. various committees were constituted by the civil revision no.2471 of 2012 (o&m) 8 central government as 'narasimham committee i and ii' for the purpose of examining the banking sector reforms and considered the needs for changes in the legal system ..... by the civil court infringing the rights of the secured creditor has been held to be null and void in a case sasi and another versus housing development finance corporation ltd.and others.air 201.kerala 1, wherein it was observed as under:- 8. it has to be noted that the mandate of section 34 is ..... case the saraswat co-operative bank limited (formerly maratha mandir co.operative bank limited) a co-operative bank limited registered under the provisions of multi-state co-operative societies act, 2002 versus madan s. jha and another, 2010 (4) bombay cr 1.had also dealt with the matter with regard to the jurisdiction of the civil court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... by a winding up process. i have already extracted the relevant clauses in the memorandum and articles of association that spell out the permissible acts outside the arena of banking or financing activities. the satisfaction that section 45mc requires is one of 4 situations, clause (a) contemplates inability of a company to pay its ..... company, as per its memorandum and article of association, are to carry on india or elsewhere in all its branches the business of hire purchase, housing, general finance, investments; to purchase, sell or hire out or sell by installment or on hire purchase system all kinds of motor vehicle, motor cycles, scooter, moped, ..... court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh c.a. no.85 of 2011 in/and c.p. no.148 of 2008 date of decision:10.12.2012 reserve bank of india ....petitioner versus m/s diamond fincap ltd. ....respondent ii. c.a. no.83 of 2011 in/and c.p. no ..... . c.p. nos. 148 and 149 of 2008 list on 11.01.2013 as per roster. ( k. kannan) judge 10 12.2012 anand/sanjeev .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... knowledge that the amount that was being paid to them was more than what they were entitled to. it would not be out of place to mention here that the finance department had, in its counter affidavit, admitted that it was a bona fide mistake on their part. the excess payment made was the result of wrong interpretation of ..... him. the principle of law, however, has been set at rest by hon'ble supreme court in chandi parsad uniyal and others vs. state of uttrakhand and others, j.2012 (7) sc 460.that any amount paid/received without authority of law can always be recovered barring few exceptions of extreme hardships but not as a matter of right. ..... the respondent to have deducted the amount of salary already disbursed to the petitioner whose condition was pathetic and that too from the amount of compensation awarded under the act of 1923 for which he was in the dire need and undergoing treatment for the injuries suffered in the performance of his official duties. the respondents could surely not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
..... shri dhanwantry education society, which is a duly registered society under the societies registration act, 1860, is running an ayurveda college and hospital in chandigarh. it is a self- financed unaided professional college. it is statedly recognised by central council of indian medicine (for short ccim .).the college is imparting bams cours. ..... advocate, for the petitioner (in cwp no.17592 of 2010. mr.gurminder singh, advocate, for the petitioner (in cwp no.16219 of 2012).mr.sukhdeep s.sandhu, advocate, central government standing counsel, for the union of india. ms.anu chatrath kapur, advocate, for respondent no.2. mr.atul arya, advocate, for ..... education society, ayurvedic college and dabur dhanwantry ayurvedic hospital, sector 46-b, chandigarh versus the government of india, new delhi & others.and 16219 of 2012 (shri dhanwantry education society, ayurvedic college and dabur dhanwantry ayurvedic hospital, sector 46-b, chandigarh versus union of india & others.the facts have been taken .....
Tag this Judgment!