Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... purposes of this sub- section, (a) co-operative bank and primary agricultural credit society shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in part v of the banking regulation act, 1949 (10 of 1949); 2 ins. by the finance act, 2006 (21 of 2006), sec.19 (w.e.f. 1-4-2007). earlier sub-section (4) was omitted by the ..... agricultural credit co- operative society means a co-operative society as defined under clause (cciv) of section 5 of banking regulation act, 1949 (central act 10 of 1949) and includes a multipurpose co-operative society;]. 6 clause (h-2) inserted by act no.6 of 2010 and shall be deemed to have come into force w.e.f. 3-11-2009. :9. :9 ..... day, ram mohan reddy, j.delivered the following: judgment the assessee has come up in appeal invoking section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 (for short the act ), calling in question the assessment order dated 31.10.2012, annexure b , the order dated 07.10.2013 of the first appellate authority, annexure c and order dated 17.04.2014 of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... the board circular dt.14.7.1994, which has classified that the single panel circuit breakers are classifiable under chapter 8537 has retrospective effect? under the central excise tariff act, 1985 and the rules, 1944, the board had issued a circular dated 14.7.1994 with regard to classification of goods. hence the apex court in ..... regarding the distribution of the remaining amount are determined by the finance commission, which is appointed every five years. the board is constituted under the central board of revenue act, 1963. it is one of the six authorities constituted under the act (vide sections 116 of the act). this is the highest executive authority for administering the direct tax ..... .2001 is prospective in effect and not retrospective and the assessee cannot take advantage of the instruction and decision of this court made in re rankaand ranka (2012(73) kar.l.j.30 (hc)(db)), holding that the instruction no.3, issued by the board is applicable to the pending cases filed prior to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... . one another salient aspect of the government order is that as the proposed project comes under schedule-i of the notification issued by the central government under the provisions of the environment [protection] act, 1986 and rules and regulations, the company is required to obtain not only the approval of the state government for the project, but ..... remains in part-iii of the constitution of india, article 300a of the constitution of india finds place in chapter-iv of part-12 dealing with commercial transactions, finance, property and contracts and suit sin part-12. 78. while article 300a of the constitution of india has not found many customers for its blossoming by judicial ..... , which is a clear instance of colourable exercise of power, in this regard learned counsel has relied upon the judgment render by this court on 07.03.2012 in wa no.1938 of 2007 and connected matters. 27. sri datar submits that in the instant case also the state government has not formed an independent .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... such approval nor the procedural requirements and exercise of power on relevant considerations can be given up. no statutory authority whether functioning under the present act or under any other enactment can abdicate its duties and responsibilities in favour of the decisions/clearance/approval of the so called state level single window ..... please find enclosed combined application from [caf] which has to be filed for obtaining the required different department/authority as per the karnataka industries [[facilitation]] act, 2002. you are requested to fill up and provide two sets of caf along with the required fees by way of demand draft and other enclosures securely ..... for acquisition was laid by the clearance given by the state level single window clearance agency functioning under the provisions of the karnataka industries [facilitation] act, 2002; that the state level single window clearance committee had considered the proposal of the fifth respondent in its 27th meeting held on 28.11. .....
Tag this Judgment!