Court : Jharkhand
..... ) jharkhand state tribal cooperative development corporation limited (iv) jharkhand state other backward classes cooperative development corporation limited and, (v) jharkhand state minority finance corporation limited and all these undertakings/corporations are units/instrumentalities of the welfare department, government of jharkhand. the jharkhand state tribal development corporation limited ..... be taken over by the government. the learned counsel placed reliance on the decisions in monnet ispat & energy ltd. v. union of india & ors. , reported in (2012) 11 scc 1, in state of w.b. & ors. v. niranjan singha , reported in (2001) 2 scc 326, in p.t.r. exports (madras ..... briefly stated, the petitioner institute of continuing education research and training, a non governmental organisation, is a society registered under the societies registration act, which is involved in various social welfare activities. under the meso project, for operation of the hospitals the government took a decision vide .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... its letter dated 13.11.2014. (e) moreover, this petitioner has also been given demand-cum-show cause notice under section 73 of the finance act, 1994 for the assessment years 2009-10 to 2012-13 for rs. 6,58,90,037/-. paragraph 6.02 of the said demand-cum-show cause notice issued by the respondents under section 73- ..... judgment rendered in the case of r.v. man power solution vs. commr. of cus. and central excise, as reported in (2014) 69 vst528(uttarakhand), as under: 9. according to me, going by the language of section 87 of the finance act that any amount payable means that amount adjudged after hearing the show cause notice and this provision of ..... of the service tax amount comes to rs. 3.05 crores instead of rs. 4.46 crores approximately and when during his statement recorded under section 14 of the central excise act, 1944, as stated herein above, while replying the question no. 12 categorically has stated that he shall give detail calculation later on, upon conjoint reading of answer of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... .10.2005 was a policy decision taken by the minister in charge, housing, in 46 consultation with other higher officials of the government including, the finance secretary and the housing secretary, pursuant to which the jharkhand state housing board invited tenders and finally the successful bidders were allotted vacant plots for construction ..... board. 48. after the decision taken in the meeting dated 05.10.2005, an advertisement was issued inviting expressions of interest from reputed private companies, central and state public sector undertakings. on 22.03.2007, managing director of the board informed the petitioner that it has been selected for construction of 30 ..... matter, in a manner unknown to its own rules and procedure. scheme of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000:68. the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that letter dated 12.12.2012 indicates that the state government declined to accord sanction on the ground that the development agreements were executed in .....
Tag this Judgment!