Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2012 central chapter iii direct taxes Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 100 of about 1,642 results (0.149 seconds)

Feb 18 2013 (HC)

Ajay Kumar Sharma Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and anr

Court : Delhi

..... so because on a reasonable interpretation of the provisions of section 80-ic(2) read with serial no. 20 of the 13th schedule of the said act read with the first schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985, it would be clear that the petitioners product does not fall within the negative list and therefore the petitioner had rightly claimed deduction under ..... classification. unfortunately this aspect of the matter has not been dealt with appropriately, if at all, by the assessing officer in the order dated 17.02.2012 rejecting the objections raised by the petitioner.9. we have also heard the learned counsel for the respondent who has supported the issuance of the notices as also the purported ..... kumar sharma ... petitioner versus commissioner of income tax and anr wp(c) 1987/12, 2732/12, 2749/12 & 2733/2012 advocates who appeared in these cases: for the petitioner for the respondent : mr a. sharma, mr manu k. giri : ms suruchii aggarwal coram:honble mr justice badar durrez ahmed honble .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 13 2013 (HC)

Wipro Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

..... , 2005, which clause has the force of law by virtue of the declaration made under the provisional collection of taxes act, 1931 (16 of 1931); (e) special excise duty collected under a finance act; (f) ceac 16 2012 the central excise act, 1944 (1 of 1944); additional duty of excise as levied under section (g) education cess on excisable goods as levied under section 91 read ..... with section 93 of the finance (no.2) act, 2004 (23 of 2004); and (h) the additional duty of excise leviable under clause .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2013 (HC)

M/S Persys Punj Lloyd Joint Venture Vs. Commissioner of Vat and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... or a sale outside the state under section 4 or a sale in the course of import or export under section 5 of the central sales tax act, 1956. (5) no tax shall be payable under this section on the turnover of sales relating to the amount paid to a ..... likely to be asked to make pre-deposit of the disputed tax, interest and penalty u/s. 43(5) of the dst act. this is likely to affect the finances of the petitioner prejudicially, particularly when the grievance is that the orders complained of lack jurisdiction, ex-facie. in such a ..... delhi, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner. they arise from orders passed under the delhi sales tax on works contracts act, 1999 (wc act) read with delhi sales act, 1975 (dst act). since all the petitions were heard together and three of them also involve common issues, they are disposed of by ..... * in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on:13. h december, 2012 date of decision:12. h february, 2013 % + + + + w.p.(c) 8620/2009, c.m. appl. 5744/2009 w.p.(c .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2013 (HC)

Sri Sai Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital and Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... submits that in spite of the fact that the petitioner had already been granted the permission under section 13 a of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 with effect from academic year 2011-2012 as per the communication dated 02.12.2010, after the petitioner no. 1 was found to be complying with all the requirements, ..... carried out by the respondent no. 2 and after careful consideration of recommendation of respondent no. 2, in terms of the provisions of the indian medicine central council act, 1970 and relevant regulations, permission was granted for opening new pg courses in the above mentioned two subjects and permission was also granted to increase the ..... the petitioner no. 1 college has already granted admission to the students who had cleared the requisite entrance examinations and also to those foreign students who are financed by the central government, as their future and career would have otherwise been ruined.31. it is also submitted that on 31.10.2011 at around 2:30 pm .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2013 (HC)

Abc Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... i of the seventh schedule. pertinently, no such tax appears to have been imposed by the parliament so far. he also notices that under the central sales tax act, 1956, the central government has excluded newspapers from the scope of sales tax for purchase of goods in the course of inter-state trade or commerce. postal regulations ..... against (i) the state (government); (ii) an authority; (iii) a statutory body; (iv) an instrumentality or agency of the state; (v) a company which is financed and owned by the state; (vi) a private body run substantially on state funding; (vii) a private body discharging public duty or positive obligation of public nature; and (viii ..... petitioner and the victim went into oblivion and were not contacting even their counsel for years. it was only during the pendency of the matter, on 14.12.2012, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that she has been able to locate the petitioner.10. the petitioner, therefore, by the present petition seeks a direction to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2013 (HC)

Milk Food Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Vat and ors

Court : Delhi

..... (1966) 18 stc 305.a single judge of the punjab high court (circuit bench) while dealing with similar provisions of the bengal finance (sales tax act), 1941 as extended to delhi, held that the declaration required to be submitted by the purchasing dealer should be a valid declaration at ..... nawal kishore & co., m/s durga trading co. and m/s rajan & co. the demands raised and penalties imposed under the central sales tax act were however set aside by the tribunal.8. it is against the above order passed by the tribunal that the appellant has come in ..... ram hukamchand and m/s richo mal krishan swarup. though the penalty of `400/- imposed under the central sales tax act was cancelled, the demand of `29,278/- under that act was upheld.5. the dealer filed a further appeal before the appellate tribunal value added tax and raised ..... * in the high court of delhi at new delhi reserved on :1. t august, 2012 date of decision :4. h february, 2013 % + + st.appl.14/2011, cm appl.12520/2011 st.appl.15/2011, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (HC)

Delhi Chartered Accountants Society (Regd.) Vs. Union of India and ors ...

Court : Delhi

..... crucial aspect.12. we still have to reckon with section 66b of the finance act, 1994 inserted by the finance act, 2012 w.e.f. 1.7.2012 vide notification no.19/2012-st, dated 5.6.2012. this section is as follows :66b.charge of service tax on and after finance act, 2012 there shall be levied a tax (hereinafter referred to as the service tax ..... tax with which we are not concerned. section 93 conferred power upon the central government to grant exemption from the levy of service tax. section 94 conferred power upon the central government to make rules for carrying out the provisions of chapter v of the finance act, 1994.3. a question arose as to what is the taxable event ..... rules, 2011. the point of taxation rules, 2011 have been notified in exercise of the powers conferred upon the central government under clause (a) and clause (hhh) of sub-section (2) of section 94 of the finance act, 1994 and they are also required to be placed before both the houses of parliament under sub-section (4) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (TRI)

S. Rajguru Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... of 1998) in the matters of zunjarrao bhikaji nagarkar vs. union of india and others [1999 -7-scc-409] under central excise rules, 1944 rule173q; section 11ac of the central excise act, 1944 and rule14 of central civil services (classification control and appeal) rules, 1965 where two principal issues arose for the consideration of honble supreme court: (1 ..... number 1 to 9 to enable him to file a detailed reply. he also sought personal hearing. using the instruments of right to information act, 2005 in may, 2012 he received copy of the note sheet (available at annexure a-5) and came to understand that the charge memo originated from the secret ..... the ccs (cca) rules, 1965 and, therefore, has sought the following relief(s):- (a) quash the memorandum (f.no. c-14011/24/2012-28l) dated 26th april, 2012, initiating disciplinary proceedings against the applicant. direct the respondents to release the pensionary benefits such as commutation of pension, leave encashment, gratuity of the applicant .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2013 (HC)

Texmaco Limited Vs. the Union of India and anr

Court : Delhi

..... credit has to be given to goods covered under sections 14 and 15 of the central sales tax act.24. pw-2 p.d. agarwal, in his affidavit ex.pw-2/1, stated that he is deputy general manager (finance) and earlier he was finance manager when the contract was executed. he stated that out of amount of `46,62 ..... attorney, and to have been executed before, and authenticated by, a notary public, or any court, judge, magistrate, [indian] consul or viceconsul, or representative of the [central government], was so executed and authenticated. under the above provision of law, it is clear that the court is bound to presume that the power of attorney executed and ..... a trunk which was not traceable. directions were issued by the court to trace out the said documents by order dated 2nd november, 2012 and 16th november, 2012. it was informed on 23rd november, 2012 that the trunk containing the exhibited documents filed and referred by the defendants have been traced out by the registry, thus the matter was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2013 (HC)

Vinod Goenka Vs. the Directorate of Enforcement

Court : Delhi

..... concerned are : ahmed shakir, director genex exim ventures pvt. ltd. (in short genex) and mr. pratap ghose, cfo of etisalat, k. vasudeva, vice president (finance), etisalat. it may be pertinent to note it is these persons apart from the complainant i.e., one rajeshwar singh, assistant director, doe, qua whom the petitioners made ..... litigation before this court. in the first round, the petitioner had approached this court, by way of two separate writ petitions bearing nos.6358/2012 and 6360/2012, seeking copies of final replies filed by other noticees apart from the petitioners herein; who are arrayed as respondents in the complaint filed by doe ..... the state of maharashtra & ors., civil appeal no.7728/2012 decided on 08.11.2012 by the supreme court; (b). mehar singh vs. appellate board foreign exchange, crl. a. 109/1975, decided on 18.09.1985; (c). central govt. represented by the director, enforcement directorate, foreign exchange regulation act, new delhi vs. fr. alfred james fernandez, air .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //